Integrating Management for Key Orchard Pests

 

By: Robert McDougall and Anne L. Nielsen

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is the practice of using biological information to efficiently and effectively control pests while reducing reliance of pesticides. IPM is typically depicted as a pyramid of tactics that build on each other moving from least toxic at the bottom to most disruptive at the top. But in practice, IPM for insects in tree fruit relies primarily on application of synthetic insecticides guided by degree-day timing or trap counts. We want to flip the “IPM pyramid” around to emphasize that insecticides are the last tool for pest management and build upon other biologically-based practices.

Graphic describing management practices for orchard pests

By Anne Nielsen

The least disruptive means of pest control are cultural measures, those that seek to prevent pests from becoming problematic in the first place. These can include measures such as planting resistant cultivars, practicing good hygiene to prevent pest entry and maintaining diverse plantings in crop margins to encourage natural biological control agents (e.g. other insects that eat pests). In tree fruit, cultural control may include rootstock resistant to wooly apple aphid or removal and burning of pruned limbs and dying trees (for borer or scale management) which removes infested plant material and habitat for other pests.

For curative action, a central component of IPM programs depends on monitoring programs to identify pest species, occurrence and seasonality, and abundance. This is achieved primarily through direct sampling of plant tissue or baited traps. Regardless of the monitoring method, it must be conducted frequently, weekly at best. Monitoring can also establish biofix dates to start accumulating degree-days that when applied to models predict life stages of insects based on available heat units for development.

Upon identification of key pests within the orchard, the next action can take on a wide range of forms depending on the pest. This can include biological control measures, such as enhancing or introducing a natural enemy of the pest into the system in the hope of controlling it. Interactions between natural enemies and pests occur naturally within an orchard, but the strength of the interaction can be weakened through chemical insecticides and lead to outbreaks of pests, particularly aphids, mites, thrips, and scales. Implementation of reduced input or non-chemical methods can protect populations of natural enemies such as predators or parasitoids within the orchard and prevent a pest from becoming actionable. An example of a biological control program currently under investigation is controlling the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug with the Samurai Wasp, a tiny stingless Asian wasp which lays its eggs in BMSB eggs, preventing them from hatching and producing more Samurai Wasps instead of stink bugs.

The next IPM tool is behavioral management which changes the behavior of the insect so that less insecticide can be used. Insects, like other animals, have predicable behaviors, that once understood can be exploited for management. Two common approaches include altering insect behavior with pheromones (ie. mating disruption or attract-and-kill) or exploiting dispersal behaviors to apply targeted management (ie. border sprays). Mating disruption uses a species’ own sex pheromone to reduce mating within the orchard. This is accomplished by placing multiple dispensers containing pheromone throughout the orchard. This changes the behavior of male moths that are searching for females and results in fewer females laying eggs within the orchard (and cleaner fruit at harvest). For many insect species, including Oriental Fruit Moth and borers, no additional insecticide is needed (based on monitoring trap thresholds). Mating disruption for Oriental Fruit Moth in peaches can cost the same if not less than insecticide management and is highly effective. Mating disruption technology against borers is becoming increasingly necessary as further use restrictions change for Lorsban.

The behavioral tactic attract-and-kill places high doses of pheromone, usually an aggregation pheromone, on select trees to attract males and females (and sometimes nymphs) to a tree where they can then be killed with an insecticide. It is not believed to bring additional insects into the orchard, rather it brings those that are already there into one area. A second type of behavioral control is the use of border sprays. Many insects are often found in greater numbers in the edges of orchards because their dispersal is arrested due to visual cues provided by trees on the orchard edge. A border spray is usually defined as spraying the outer rows of orchard trees with insecticide. This tactic has shown to be very successful for controlling brown marmorated stink bug in peaches and apples, and reduces insecticide sprays by 25% relative to alternate row middle applications. Plum curculio also exhibits this behavior, and Rutgers is currently investigating whether it can be effectively controlled by spraying just the outer two rows of orchards during movement into the orchard.

IPM practices have evolved considerably in the past few decades and orchards are managed safer and more efficiently each year. Some of the IPM tactics described above may already be part of your orchard management practices. But as production cost increases are not instep with fruit prices, tactics that rely less on insecticide inputs will help protect orchard viability.

2019 Wine Grape Twilight Meetings

The 2019 Wine Grape Twilight Meetings are being held in South Jersey on Wednesday, May 22 and North Jersey on Thursday, May 23.

See flyer for details.

2019 Wine Grape Twilight Meetings

South Jersey: Wednesday, May 22; 5:00-7:30 PM
William Heritage Winery
480 Mullica Hill Rd
Mullica Hill, NJ
North Jersey: Thursday, May 23; 5:00-7:30 PM
Fox Hollow Vineyards
939 Holmdel Rd
Holmdel, NJ
RSVP to Joan Medany at JMEDANY@CO.GLOUCESTER.NJ.US or 856-224-8040 EXT 1.

South Jersey Tree Fruit Twilight Meeting – I

When: March 27 @ 7 PM

Where: Gloucester County Extension Office, 1200 N. Delsea Drive, Bldg. # A, Clayton, NJ 08312

7:00 PM: Welcome Remarks and Updates.

Hemant Gohil, Gloucester County Agricultural Agent, Rutgers NJAES

Comprehensive Understanding of Spotted Lantern Fly in Orchard Crops

Heather Leach, Spotted Lantern Fly Extension Associate, Penn State University.                                                                                             Invited Speaker, Heather leach is specialist on Spotted Lanternfly (SLF). She will speak on the comprehensive understanding of  SLF  priorities from every perspective and provide latest information on biology, behavior and effective management techniques.

Pesticide Record Keeping Update. 

George Hamilton, Extension Specialist in Pest Management, Rutgers NJAES

Food Safety Issues Related to Tree Fruit Production.

Wes Kline, Cumberland County Agriculture Agent, Rutgers NJAES

Management of Scale Insect in Peach

Anne Nielsen, Extension Specialist, Fruit Entomology, Rutgers NJAES

Early Season Disease Control

Norman Lalancette, Extension Specialist, Tree Fruit Pathology, Rutgers NJAES

Scouting Observations and IPM of Early Season Pests

Dave Schmitt and Dean Polk, State-wide Fruit IPM Agent, Rutgers NJAES

9:30 PM Pesticide re-certification credits application and Adjourn

Light fare will be provided. Please call Joan Medany jmedany@co.gloucester.nj.us or call 856-224-8030 if you are planning to attend.

This site is accessible to the physically impaired. If an additional assistance is needed, please contact Hemant Gohil (Program Organizer) at 856-224-8029 prior to the meeting.

Insect Management with Low Fruit Load

After the critically cold temperatures in early April followed by several other nights of below freezing temperatures, NJ peach and apple growers have experienced loss of blossoms and/or fruit set. While the extent of the injury may still be too early to tell for some varieties, the cold weather has not stopped insect pests and where no fruit will be harvested we need to adjust our approach to insect management. This provides an opportunity to use selective materials where possible and allow natural enemy populations to attack some key pests.

IMG_0379

Terminal flagging from Oriental fruit moth egg laying

Oriental Fruit Moth lays its eggs of at least the first and second generation in peach terminals. Due to low or absent fruit loads, the trees will be very flush and provide lots of oviposition sites. Injury to terminals is noticeable by “flagging” of the terminals. If unmanaged, populations will be high in 2017 and could be difficult to control. Thus management of at least the first and second generation OFM needs to occur. I would strongly recommend using mating disruption, such as OFM TT, for unharvestable orchards. This will control all 4 generations and significantly reduce OFM pressure next year without harming beneficial insects. Mating disruption dispensers are placed in the middle of the tree canopy and can be placed now. See label for rate information. Sprayable mating disruption such as Checkmate OFM-F can be applied at 1.32 – 2.93 oz/A applied just prior to adult flight and again during flight. For chemical options, we generally use 5-6 male moths in a trap as a trigger for management. If monitoring traps exceed 5-6, then the use of either Madex HP or a diamide chemistry (ie. Altacor) is recommended. Madex HP is an insect virus that only attacks OFM and codling moth and is very effective in both research and commercial trials in NJ at rates from 1.5 – 3.0 oz/acre. Both Madex and the diamides will have minimal impact on natural enemies but have good control of OFM and should be applied at diamide timing according to the DD model (see NJ Tree Fruit Production Guide or PPA posts from IPM scouting). Codling moth and OFM in apple will likely not require management but should still be monitored. [Read more…]