Vegetable Crops Edition

Seasonal updates and alerts on insects, diseases, and weeds impacting vegetable crops. New Jersey Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations updates between annual publication issues are included.
 
Subscriptions are available via EMAIL and RSS.
 
Quick Links:

NJ Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations

Rutgers Weather Forecasting - Meteorological Information important to commercial agriculture.

Veg IPM Update 9/5/25

Greetings from the Veg IPM team!

Sweet Corn

Corn earworm (CEW) moth captures are very high — many locations need 3-day spray intervals (see map). If temperatures get high (>85 degrees F), shorten the spray interval by one day. Rotation is important for avoiding resistance, and there are four IRAC groups that are registered in silking sweet corn: 1 (carbamates), 3 (pyrethroids), 5 (spinosyns), and 28 (diamides). CEW is at least partly resistant to several pyrethroids, so a spray program should not rely solely on pyrethroids, although they can be useful in tank-mixes or as pre-mixed products, such as Besiege or Elevest (Group 28 + Group 3). For detailed information about resistance and potential spray programs, the University of Delaware has an excellent resource on corn earworm management.

Spray intervals based on nightly pheromone moth captures for the southern part of New Jersey. Note that not all locations in the IPM program are currently trapping. This map is based on the following thresholds: 0 moths = 6-7 day schedule, 1 moth = 5 day spray schedule, 2-20 moths = 4 day spray schedule, 20+ moths = 3 day spray schedule.

We’re seeing fall armyworm (FAW) infestations in many locations. Young larvae will cause damage known as “window paning”, in which the top surface of the leaf is eaten away, leaving behind thin, white, membranous-looking scratch marks. As the larvae get bigger, these feeding marks become more ragged (A). The damage can look somewhat similar to European corn borer feeding, but FAW damage will be more severe and will lead down into the whorl. The caterpillars have a dark head capsule with a distinct, inverted Y-shaped suture (B). They can also be identified by four dark dots arranged in a square on their last segments. We use a treatment threshold of 12% fresh feeding damage in pre-tassel corn. Below this level, treatments for FAW are unlikely to pay off and can flare up aphids. For treatment, we recommend using products other than diamides (IRAC Group 28) when treating whorl-stage infestations, as diamides are important to save for silk protection. Effective products include Lannate (Group 1A), Radiant (Group 5), Intrepid (Group 18), Intrepid Edge (5+18), and Avaunt (Group 22). Note that Avaunt can only be used through tassel push.

Fall armyworm damage (A) and larva (B). Note the distinctive suture on the head, which will differentiate FAW from other caterpillar pests of corn. Photos by Amanda Quadrel

We continue to see corn leaf aphids in sweet corn tassels and ears. In high numbers they can reduce pollination or cause honeydew and sooty mold on ears that harm marketability. Broad spectrum insecticides, especially pyrethroids, can flare up aphids by disrupting the natural enemies that typically control them. We have seen several instances where FAW sprays in the vegetative stage may have caused high aphid populations during silking. If you’re seeing a lot of aphids on corn tassels, you can start your CEW spray rotation with Lannate (group 1A), which has some efficacy for aphids. Come back a week later and check ear tips for aphid populations. If they are high, as in the below picture, use a product more targeted for aphids, such as Assail 30SG or 30 SC (group 4A), Transform WG (group 4C), or Sivanto Prime (group 4D). Keep in mind that Transform WG and Sivanto Prime have 7 day PHIs.

Close up of the silks and leaves at the tip of a corn ear with many blue-green aphids clustered on the leaf.

Corn leaf aphids on the tip of an ear. Note blue-green color with dark tail pipes (also called cornicles), legs, and antennae. Picture by Maria Cramer.

Tomatoes

Throughout New Jersey we’re continuing to see high thrips counts both in tunnels and in the field.  Thrips management is especially important because of their ability to vector tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), a growing problem in New Jersey where we have resistance-breaking strains. There have been many outbreaks of TSWV (in both peppers and tomatoes) throughout south Jersey this season. Scouting and roguing out these plants (see pictures below) while continuing to manage thrips can help contain losses. Additionally, follow best management practices for reducing TSWV risk throughout the season.

For scouting, we consider 1-5 thrips on 10 leaves to be a low count and more than 5 thrips a high count. Other guides suggest a treatment threshold of 3-5 thrips per flower or the presence of stippling damage on fruit. Western flower thrips, the primary vector of TSWV, has resistance to some carbamates (group 1A) and organophosphates (group 1B) as well as pyrethroids (group 3), so few are useful for management. They are also broad-spectrum and hard on natural enemies, potentially flaring up secondary pests like spider mites. The following products have varying efficacy for western flower thrips management:

  • Group 5 insecticides (e.g. Radiant, Entrust) historically have given the best control, but growers have been finding resistance throughout south Jersey. If you have applied Radiant or Entrust and have not gotten good control, your local thrips populations may be resistant. Group 5 insecticides can also only be used twice per season in a planting.
  • Lannate (Group 1A) gives the next best thrips knockdown, but is broad spectrum and is not a part of all growers’ spray programs.
  • Beleaf 50SG (Group 29) can be very effective applied through drip irrigation, but takes a while to decrease thrips populations. It is systemic, making it safer for natural enemies than some other products.
  • Group 28 products with the active ingredient cyantriniliprole (e.g. Minecto Pro, Verimark, Exirel) provided suppression in trials.
  • Movento (Group 23, active ingredient spirotetramat) — provided suppression in trials.
  • Requiem EC (no group, active ingredient Chenopodium extract) — provided suppression in trials.

Many products only suppress thrips, meaning they kill larvae but not adults, or kill only the active life stages (larvae and adults, not the egg or pupal stages). Rotate between active ingredients and try to avoid getting to very high thrips numbers which are more difficult to knock back down.

A) TSWV symptoms on leaves — note curling, yellowing, and browning. B) Symptoms on green fruit — irregular brown blotches and misshapen fruit. C) Symptoms on red fruit — concentric circles. Photos by Maria Cramer.

We’ve seen some fruit damage from caterpillars, and tomato fruitworm (AKA corn earworm), armyworms (beet and yellow striped), and hornworms on plants and fruit. There are no reliable thresholds for determining when to spray for these caterpillar pests, however scouting and consulting the corn earworm pressure map for the state will help give a sense of risk to the crop. When corn earworm pressure indicates a 3 or 4 day spray interval in corn (2-20 moths per night) as is currently the case in much of the state, tomatoes should be scouted weekly for feeding damage. Beet armyworm moth numbers in traps in Salem and Cumberland counties have been low (>5 per night). Pyrethroid resistance is widespread in tomato fruitworm/corn earworm and beet armyworm, so other classes of insecticides should be used if management is needed.

Tomato fruitworm head visible emerging from a hole in a small green tomato.

Tomato fruitworm/corn earworm infesting a green tomato. Photo by Maria Cramer.

We continue to see high spider mites in many plantings. Spider mites tend to be worse in hot, dry conditions, and their populations can dramatically increase following broad-spectrum insecticides, which reduce their natural enemies. The first sign of their presence is often light-colored stippling seen on the top surface of tomato leaves. The mites causing this damage are usually found on the undersides of leaves, though with bad infestations mites will be found on the upper surface as well. When sampling spider mites, check 10 upper leaflets in at least 5 sites per field. The treatment threshold is 2 mites per leaflet on average (one of the individual leaves that makes up the compound tomato leaf). On farms where crop rotation is limited and the same miticides have been used for multiple years we’re seeing some miticide resistance — check whether and application has decreased mite populations, and if it did not work well, do not keep using it. Rotate between miticides and only treat when above threshold. Some products for spider mites in tomatoes include:

  • Nealta (group 25)
  • Oberon (group 23)
  • Portal (group 21A)
  • Agri-Mek (group 6) *7 day PHI
  • Kanemite (group 20B)
  • Acramite (group 20D) *3 day PHI
Tomato leaves with tiny yellow or white dots on visible on the top surface of the leaf.

Spider mite stippling visible when looking at tomato leaves from above. The spider mites are generally found on the undersides of the leaves. Photo by Maria Cramer.

Peppers

In terms of most insect pests, peppers have been looking very good. We have seen aphids, spider mites, and thrips at low levels so far, however it’s important to keep in mind that thrips can transmit TSWV to peppers as well, and so monitoring and staying on top of thrips populations is crucial. As with tomatoes, finding and roguing out infected plants is important as well (see picture below for symptoms on foliage and fruit).

Two pictures: the top picture shows a pepper plant with mottled yellow and green foliage. The bottom picture shows a cherry hot pepper that is green and red with many concentric circles on the skin.

A) TSWV symptoms on pepper foliage — note mottling and cupping of the foliage. B) Symptoms on cherry pepper fruit. Photos by Maria Cramer.

As a reminder, we have found pepper weevils on pepper weevil traps in Gloucester, Cumberland, and Salem Counties this summer. Read more about pepper weevil biology and management here. If you think you may have pepper weevil on your farm or are interested in monitoring, please contact Maria Cramer.

Cole Crops 

We are seeing many different kinds of caterpillars in fall cole crop plantings, including diamondback moth, imported cabbage worm, cabbage looper, cross-striped cabbageworm, and yellow striped armyworm. All cole crop seedlings can tolerate up to 10% infestation for these caterpillar. For heading cole crops between early vegetative and cupping, the treatment threshold is 30%. As heads form, the treatment threshold goes down to just 5% infestation. Sprayable Bt products (IRAC 11A) such as Dipel, Xentari, or Javelin can be effective on young imported cabbage worm, cross-striped cabbageworm, and yellow-striped armyworm caterpillars. Diamondback moth has resistance to many insecticide groups, and pyrethroids (IRAC 3A) and Bt products (IRAC 11A) are not effective for their management. Besides Bt, materials approved for caterpillar control include Entrust/Radiant (IRAC 5), Proclaim (IRAC 6), Torac (IRAC 21A), and Exirel (IRAC 28).  For Bt products and contact insecticides, coverage on the undersides the leaves is essential.

Caterpillar pests of cole crops. A) Diamondback moth — smooth and tapered at each end. B) Imported cabbageworm — fuzzy and not tapered. C) Cabbage looper — characteristic looping behavior. D) Cross-striped cabbage worm — distinctive stripes, usually occurs in groups. Photos A-C by Maria Cramer, photo D from iNaturalist COO.

We saw downy mildew in cole crops this week. This is a disease that develops best around 50-59ºF and our cool night temperatures are making prime conditions for disease development. Downy mildew may appears as light-colored lesions on the top of the leaves and as masses of white spores on the lower surface. Scout at least 25 plants per field (5 plants in 5 locations), checking the undersides for spores. If you have downy mildew, rotate or tank-mix chlorothalonil 6F (FRAC M05) with another product listed in the Mid-Atlantic Veg Guide for downy mildew in cole crops, rotating MOAs. Use overhead irrigation at times of the day when leaves can dry quickly to slow disease progression.

Downy mildew spore masses on the underside of a collard leaf. Photo by Renee Carter.

Pumpkins and Other Cucurbits

Cucurbit downy mildew was first reported on 7/11/25 on cucumbers in central NJ and has been found on cucumbers and cantaloupe at the Snyder Research Farm in Pittstown. Growers should be applying protectants on cucumbers and cantaloupes for cucurbit downy mildew at this time. As of this post, we still haven’t found any instances of the disease on pumpkins, squash, or watermelon. For information on how to build an effective cucurbit down mildew control program, please reference this post by Dr. Andy Wyenandt and consult the Mid-Atlantic Production Guide for additional materials that can be used.

Cucurbit downy mildew symptoms on the upper surface (A) and underside (B) of cucumber leaves and symptoms on cantaloupe (C). Photos by Amanda Quadrel

In pumpkins, we continue to see squash bug eggs and nymphs. Consider treating for squash bug if you see more than one egg mass or group of nymphs per plant (see photos below). Aphid and mite populations are also increasing in many locations. Consult the Mid-Atlantic Production Guide for a list materials appropriate for aphids or mites.

Squash bug eggs (A), newly hatched nymphs (B), and an adult (C). Photos by Amanda Quadrel

We have also seen aphid populations building in some fields. While not causing direct damage to the fruits, the honeydew produced by aphids can stick to the fruits and attract hornets or promote sooty mold growth, resulting in unsightly fruit. If a colony is found at three or more sites in a ten site sample, growers may wish to apply control measures. There are several options available, such as Assail, Fulfill, PQZ, Sefina, and Beleaf that are labeled for aphids and are safer for bees. If also dealing with heavy mite populations, Minecto Pro can target both pests, but has a higher toxicity to bees.

Melon aphids infesting a pumpkin leaf. Photo by Amanda Quadrel.

Powdery mildew has shown up in most scouted sites. If more than one leaf in a 50 leaf sample is infected, fungicide programs for powdery mildew should be initiated.

Powdery mildew on pumpkin leaf. Photo by Amanda Quadrel.

We have also seen isolated cases of anthracnose, bacterial wilt, plectosporium, and phythophthora root rot. A preventative diseases management plan based on recommendations from the Mid-Atlantic Production Guide is important for suppressing many of these diseases. If you suspect diseases in your pumpkins (or other cucurbits), reference the “Diagnosing important diseases in Cucurbit crops” guide or send/bring samples to Rutger’s Plant Diagnostic Lab.

As always, please consult the Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Production Guide for a comprehensive list of materials that are labeled for specific crops and pests. As always, be sure to follow label rates and application instructions.

The Vegetable IPM Program wishes to thank the following Field Technicians, without whom much of the information presented weekly here would not be available. This week Nick Vergara of the Southern team went back to Rowan University for his fall semester — we appreciate all the work he put in this summer!

Southern team: Renee Carter and Kris Szymanski

Northern team: Martina Lavender, Coco Lin, and Cassandra Dougherty

Updates from EPA for Pesticide Users on How to Navigate Mitigation Measures to Protect Endangered Species

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the availability of an online tool to help farmers and applicators implement mitigation measures to protect endangered species from pesticides. The mitigation measures were established to reduce exposure from pesticides for nontarget organisms as listed under the Endangered Species Act. Levels of mitigation that are required on pesticide labels can include mitigations for spray drift, runoff, and buffer zones. In April 2025, EPA released a mitigation menu website that includes information on these measures and how to calculate if a pesticide user has incorporated the number of “points” associated with the mitigation measures required by the pesticide labelling. It is the responsibility of the pesticide user to ensure that all pesticide labelling requirements are met, and requirements will vary among labels and products used.

The new tool released by EPA, the Pesticide App for Label Mitigations (PALM) is a mobile application that helps farmers and pesticide users use the EPA’s mitigation menu and stay compliant when applying pesticides for agricultural crop uses. The tool will combine relevant information and calculations needed to help farmers determine whether the necessary level of mitigation has been met before applying a pesticide.

If you are interested in learning more about the mitigation menu and available tools, the EPA will be hosting a public webinar on September 16th at 2 PM Eastern Time. Register here for the webinar.

Veg IPM Update 8/29/25

Greetings from the Veg IPM team!

Sweet Corn

Corn earworm (CEW) moth captures have increased and are now in the typical range for late August, with most southern and central locations needing 3-day spray intervals (see map). When temperatures are high (>85 degrees F), shorten the spray interval by one day. Rotation is important for avoiding resistance, and there are four IRAC groups that are registered in silking sweet corn: 1 (carbamates), 3 (pyrethroids), 5 (spinosyns), and 28 (diamides). CEW is at least partly resistant to several pyrethroids, so a spray program should not rely solely on pyrethroids, although they can be useful in tank-mixes or as pre-mixed products, such as Besiege or Elevest (Group 28 + Group 3). For detailed information about resistance and potential spray programs, the University of Delaware has an excellent resource on corn earworm management.

Spray intervals based on nightly pheromone moth captures for the southern part of New Jersey. Note that not all locations in the IPM program are currently trapping. This map is based on the following thresholds: 0 moths = 6-7 day schedule, 1 moth = 5 day spray schedule, 2-20 moths = 4 day spray schedule, 20+ moths = 3 day spray schedule.

 

We’re seeing fall armyworm (FAW) infestations in many locations. Young larvae will cause damage known as “window paning”, in which the top surface of the leaf is eaten away, leaving behind thin, white, membranous-looking scratch marks. As the larvae get bigger, these feeding marks become more ragged (A). The damage can look somewhat similar to European corn borer feeding, but FAW damage will be more severe and will lead down into the whorl. The caterpillars have a dark head capsule with a distinct, inverted Y-shaped suture (B). They can also be identified by four dark dots arranged in a square on their last segments. We use a treatment threshold of 16% fresh feeding damage in pre-tassel corn. Below this level, treatments for FAW are unlikely to pay off and can flare up aphids. For treatment, we recommend using products other than diamides (IRAC Group 28) when treating whorl-stage infestations, as diamides are important to save for silk protection. Effective products include Lannate (Group 1A), Radiant (Group 5), Intrepid (Group 18), Intrepid Edge (5+18), and Avaunt (Group 22). Note that Avaunt can only be used through tassel push.

Fall armyworm damage (A) and larva (B). Note the distinctive suture on the head, which will differentiate FAW from other caterpillar pests of corn. Photos by Amanda Quadrel

We continue to see corn leaf aphids in sweet corn tassels and ears. In high numbers they can reduce pollination or cause honeydew and sooty mold on ears that harm marketability. Broad spectrum insecticides, especially pyrethroids, can flare up aphids by disrupting the natural enemies that typically control them. We have seen several instances where FAW sprays in the vegetative stage may have caused high aphid populations during silking. If you’re seeing a lot of aphids on corn tassels, you can start your CEW spray rotation with Lannate (group 1A), which has some efficacy for aphids. Come back a week later and check ear tips for aphid populations. If they are high, as in the below picture, use a product more targeted for aphids, such as Assail 30SG or 30 SC (group 4A), Transform WG (group 4C), or Sivanto Prime (group 4D). Keep in mind that Transform WG and Sivanto Prime have 7 day PHIs.

Close up of the silks and leaves at the tip of a corn ear with many blue-green aphids clustered on the leaf.

Corn leaf aphids on the tip of an ear. Note blue-green color with dark tail pipes (also called cornicles), legs, and antennae. Picture by Maria Cramer.

Tomatoes

Throughout New Jersey we’re continuing to see high thrips counts both in tunnels and in the field.  Thrips management is especially important because of their ability to vector tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), a growing problem in New Jersey where we have resistance-breaking strains. There have been many outbreaks of TSWV (in both peppers and tomatoes) throughout south Jersey this season. Scouting and roguing out these plants while continuing to manage thrips can help contain losses. Additionally, follow best management practices for reducing TSWV risk throughout the season.

For scouting, we consider 1-5 thrips on 10 leaves to be a low count and more than 5 thrips a high count. Other guides suggest a treatment threshold of 3-5 thrips per flower or the presence of stippling damage on fruit. Western flower thrips, the primary vector of TSWV, has resistance to some carbamates (group 1A) and organophosphates (group 1B) as well as pyrethroids (group 3), so few are useful for management. They are also broad-spectrum and hard on natural enemies, potentially flaring up secondary pests like spider mites. The following products have varying efficacy for western flower thrips management:

  • Group 5 insecticides (e.g. Radiant, Entrust) historically have given the best control, but growers have been finding resistance throughout south Jersey. If you have applied Radiant or Entrust and have not gotten good control, your local thrips populations may be resistant. Group 5 insecticides can also only be used twice per season in a planting.
  • Lannate (Group 1A) gives the next best thrips knockdown, but is broad spectrum and is not a part of all growers’ spray programs.
  • Beleaf 50SG (Group 29) can be very effective applied through drip irrigation, but takes a while to decrease thrips populations. It is systemic, making it safer for natural enemies than some other products.
  • Group 28 products with the active ingredient cyantriniliprole (e.g. Minecto Pro, Verimark, Exirel) provided suppression in trials.
  • Movento (Group 23, active ingredient spirotetramat) — provided suppression in trials.
  • Requiem EC (no group, active ingredient Chenopodium extract) — provided suppression in trials.

Many products only suppress thrips, meaning they kill larvae but not adults, or kill only the active life stages (larvae and adults, not the egg or pupal stages). Rotate between active ingredients and try to avoid getting to very high thrips numbers which are more difficult to knock back down.

Top picture shows curled tomato leaf with brown circles covering it. The bottom picture shows a pepper plant with distorted, slightly cupped leaves, and yellow markings, including circles, on many leaves.

A) TSWV on a tomato leaf. Note the circle-shaped brown lesions. B) TSWV on a pepper plant. Note the distortion of leaves all over the plant as well as the yellow wavy lines and circles visible on leaves. Photos by Maria Cramer.

We’ve seen some fruit damage from caterpillars, and tomato fruitworm (AKA corn earworm), beet armyworm, and hornworms on plants and fruit. There are no reliable thresholds for determining when to spray for these caterpillar pests, however scouting and consulting the corn earworm pressure map for the state will help give a sense of risk to the crop. When corn earworm pressure indicates a 3 or 4 day spray interval in corn (2-20 moths per night) as is currently the case in much of the state, tomatoes should be scouted weekly for feeding damage. Beet armyworm moth numbers in traps in Salem and Cumberland counties have been low (>10 per night). Pyrethroid resistance is widespread in tomato fruitworm/corn earworm and beet armyworm, so other classes of insecticides should be used if management is needed.

We continue to see high spider mites in many plantings. Spider mites tend to be worse in hot, dry conditions, and their populations can dramatically increase following broad-spectrum insecticides, which reduce their natural enemies. The first sign of their presence is often light-colored stippling seen on the top surface of tomato leaves. The mites causing this damage are usually found on the undersides of leaves, though with bad infestations mites will be found on the upper surface as well. When sampling spider mites, check 10 upper leaflets in at least 5 sites per field. The treatment threshold is 2 mites per leaflet on average (one of the individual leaves that makes up the compound tomato leaf). On farms where crop rotation is limited and the same miticides have been used for multiple years we’re seeing some miticide resistance — check whether and application has decreased mite populations, and if it did not work well, do not keep using it. Rotate between miticides and only treat when above threshold. Some products for spider mites in tomatoes include:

  • Nealta (group 25)
  • Oberon (group 23)
  • Portal (group 21A)
  • Agri-Mek (group 6) *7 day PHI
  • Kanemite (group 20B)
  • Acramite (group 20D) *3 day PHI
Tomato leaves with tiny yellow or white dots on visible on the top surface of the leaf.

Spider mite stippling visible when looking at tomato leaves from above. The spider mites are generally found on the undersides of the leaves. Photo by Maria Cramer.

Peppers

In terms of most insect pests, peppers have been looking very good. We have seen aphids, spider mites, and thrips at low levels so far, however it’s important to keep in mind that thrips can transmit TSWV to peppers as well, and so monitoring and staying on top of thrips populations is crucial. As with tomatoes, finding and roguing out infected plants is important as well. See previous section for an example of TSWV symptoms in peppers.

As a reminder, we have found pepper weevils on pepper weevil traps in Gloucester, Cumberland, and Salem Counties this summer. Read more about pepper weevil biology and management here. If you think you may have pepper weevil on your farm or are interested in monitoring, please contact Maria Cramer.

Cole Crops 

We are seeing flea beetle and caterpillar (diamondback moth, imported cabbageworm, and cross striped cabbageworm) activity in fall cole crop plantings. For flea beetles, treatments are justified if 50% of plants are infested. For caterpillars, seedlings can tolerate up to 10% infestation. For heading cole crops between early vegetative and cupping, the treatment threshold is 30%. As heads form, the treatment threshold goes down to just 5% infestation. Sprayable Bt products (IRAC 11A) such as Dipel, Xentari, or Javelin can be effective on young imported cabbage worm caterpillars. Other materials approved for caterpillar control include Entrust/Radiant (IRAC 5), Proclaim (IRAC 6), Torac (IRAC 21A), and Exirel (IRAC 28). Diamondback moth (the primary caterpillar found in southern NJ) has resistance to many insecticide groups, and pyrethroids (IRAC 3A) and Bt products (IRAC 11A) are not effective for their management. For Bt products and contact insecticides, coverage on the undersides the leaves is essential.

Two caterpillars on brassica leaves. Diamondback moth caterpillar on the left is smooth and tapered at each end. Imported cabbageworm on the right is fuzzy.

Left: Diamondback moth caterpillar, showing characteristic tapering at each end. Right: Imported cabbageworm caterpillar showing characteristic fuzziness. Pictures by Maria Cramer.

Pumpkins and Other Cucurbits

Cucurbit downy mildew was first reported on 7/11/25 on cucumbers in central NJ and has been found on cucumbers and cantaloupe at the Snyder Research Farm in Pittstown. Growers should be applying protectants on cucumbers and cantaloupes for cucurbit downy mildew at this time. As of this post, we still haven’t found any instances of the disease on pumpkins, squash, or watermelon. For information on how to build an effective cucurbit down mildew control program, please reference this post by Dr. Andy Wyenandt and consult the Mid-Atlantic Production Guide for additional materials that can be used.

Cucurbit downy mildew symptoms on the upper surface (A) and underside (B) of cucumber leaves and symptoms on cantaloupe (C). Photos by Amanda Quadrel

In pumpkins, we continue to see squash bug eggs and nymphs. Consider treating for squash bug if you see more than one egg mass or group of nymphs per plant (see photos below). Aphid and mite populations are also increasing in many locations. Consult the Mid-Atlantic Production Guide for a list materials appropriate for aphids or mites.

Squash bug eggs (A), newly hatched nymphs (B), and an adult (C). Photos by Amanda Quadrel

Powdery mildew has shown up in most scouted sites. If more than one leaf in a 50 leaf sample is infected, fungicide programs for powdery mildew should be initiated.

Powdery mildew on pumpkin leaf. Photo by Amanda Quadrel.

We have also seen isolated cases of anthracnose, bacterial wilt, plectosporium, and phythophthora root rot. A preventative diseases management plan based on recommendations from the Mid-Atlantic Production Guide is important for suppressing many of these diseases. If you suspect diseases in your pumpkins (or other cucurbits), reference the “Diagnosing important diseases in Cucurbit crops” guide or send/bring samples to Rutger’s Plant Diagnostic Lab.

As always, please consult the Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Production Guide for a comprehensive list of materials that are labeled for specific crops and pests. As always, be sure to follow label rates and application instructions.

The Vegetable IPM Program wishes to thank the following Field Technicians, without whom much of the information presented weekly here would not be available:

Southern team: Renee Carter, Kris Szymanski, and Nick Vergara

Northern team: Martina Lavender, Coco Lin, and Cassandra Dougherty

Traceability Rule (Section 204) in the Food Safety Modernization Act Delayed

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed extending the deadline for the traceability rule (Section 204) under the Food Safety Modernization Act until July 2028.  The rule was to go into effect in 2026, but FDA is allowing more time for the industry to comply based on the complexity of the rule.  The extension only relates to implementation.  There are no proposed changes to the rule itself.   Growers should take this time to discuss with their buyers how traceability will be implemented.  This is a very involved rule so do not wait until the last minute to start developing your system which meets all the provisions.

Agricultural Water Assessment Questionnaires

Anna Loewald, Research Specialist with the Northeast Center for the Advancement of Food Safety (NECAFS), in collaboration with an advisory group of regional regulatory and educational partners, has developed an Agricultural Water Assessment Questionnaire.  This tool guides growers through a structured series of questions- helping to simplify the assessment process and highlight risk areas.
➡️ They are available for download at the Food Safety Resource Clearinghouse: Agricultural Water Assessment Questionnaire.

Who Must Comply

Under the Produce Safety Rule (PSR), the new pre-harvest water rule requires many fresh fruit and vegetable growers to perform an agricultural water assessment. Compliance is phased in based on farm size (measured by sales):

  • Over $500,000 in annual sales → Rule in effect now
  • $250,000 – $500,000 → Rule takes effect in 2026
  • $25,000 – $250,000 → Rule takes effect in 2027

When the Assessment Must Be Done

  • At the beginning of each growing season
  • Anytime there are major changes to the water system or source (e.g., switching from well to pond, damage from flooding, new distribution lines, etc.)

What the Assessment Must Include

The assessment must:

  • Be written, dated, and signed by the grower or responsible party.
  • Address multiple factors, such as:
    • Water source and distribution system
    • Protection against contamination
    • Crop type and surface characteristics.
    • Method and timing of water application
    • Environmental conditions (weather damage, flooding, etc.)
    • Water test results (used as supporting evidence, not the sole factor)

Takeaway: The agricultural water assessment is not optional for covered farms. It is a documented process that must be updated regularly and reflect real-world changes in the water system. Using tools like the NECAFS questionnaire can make this process more consistent and straightforward.

When evaluating the safety of agricultural water, multiple factors must be considered together. Testing is only one component; a holistic risk assessment includes the following:

  1. Location & Nature of the Water Source
  • Ground water (e.g., wells) – typically lower risk if properly constructed and maintained.
  • Surface water (ponds, rivers, streams) – higher risk due to potential animal access and runoff.
  • Mixed sources – may require additional protective practices.
  1. Water Distribution System
  • Underground mains or buried pipe – generally more protected.
  • Above-ground pipe, lay flat, or open canals – increased potential for contamination.
  • Storage tanks or reservoirs – evaluate for exposure to animals, debris, or microbial buildup.
  1. Protection from Contamination
  • Animal intrusion (wildlife, livestock, domestic animals).
  • Manure applications and proximity to fields.
  • Cross-connections with untreated or wastewater.
  1. Agricultural Water Practices
  • Methods of application: overhead irrigation, drip, flood, etc.
  • Timing: interval between last irrigation and harvest (shorter intervals = higher risk).
  1. Crop Characteristics
  • Surface type:
    • Smooth/waxy (e.g., cabbage, tomatoes) → less microbial adhesion.
    • Netted/rough (e.g., cantaloupe, leafy greens) → higher risk.
  • Growth habit: crops close to the soil are at greater risk of contamination.
  1. Environmental Conditions
  • Weather damage: frost cracks, hail wounds, sandblasting.
  • Soil splash during rain/irrigation.
  • Flood events – significant contamination risk.
  1. Other Considerations
  • Water testing: periodic microbial testing provides valuable data but must be considered alongside the full risk profile.
  • Historical issues: prior contamination events, known sources of runoff, or nearby land uses (e.g., livestock, septic systems).

 Exemptions from the Agricultural Water Assessment Requirement

Not all farms are required to complete a pre-harvest water assessment under the Produce Safety Rule. If the operation meets any one of the following conditions, the assessment is not required:

  • No untreated surface water is applied to covered produce.
  • Untreated groundwater is used, and it is tested following the harvest/post-harvest water protocol:
    • Four samples collected in the first year, tested for generic coli.
    • If all results are compliant (no generic coli detected), only one sample per year is required in subsequent years.
  • The public water system is the source (documentation required).
  • Water is treated and monitored to ensure it remains of safe and adequate sanitary quality for its intended use.

Takeaway: Farms using treated water, municipal water, or groundwater verified with ongoing testing do not have to perform a full agricultural water assessment.

Please take the opportunity to review the questionnaires and use them to meet the requirements for the pre-harvest water assessment!

Food Safety Training Season Starting

Fall and winter are the prime time for food safety training.  We will be starting in October with basic hands-on training for anyone starting to farm or wanting a basic refresher.  That is followed by a two day online Produce Rule Training.  This training is required for most fresh fruit and vegetable growers before the New Jersey Department of Agriculture inspects the operation.  See the details below on dates and how to register.

 October

Hands-on Produce Safety Workshop: Wednesday, October 8 from 10 am-2 pm EST.

This hands-on produce safety class in Cream Ridge, NJ is for farm owners, farm employees, farm managers, and those thinking about starting a farm. The class is focused on the various actions that can be part of a strong produce safety plan whether you have one or are just getting started. These activities include building a DIY hand-washing station, assessing wildlife risks in the field and developing an action plan, an interactive cleaning and sanitizing demonstration, and more.

December

Two-day online Food Safety Modernization Act: Produce Safety Rule Training: December 9 – 10.

You’ll need to attend both days to receive a certificate, and you must always have a camera on during the training according to the Produce Safety Alliance Online Training Policies.

The PSA Grower Training Course is one way to satisfy the FSMA Produce Safety Rule requirement outlined in § 112.22(c) that requires ‘At least one supervisor or responsible party for your farm must have successfully completed food safety training at least equivalent to that received under a standardized curriculum recognized as adequate by the Food and Drug Administration.’

For more information on any of these classes or to sign up go to: Our Trainings – Rutgers On-Farm Food Safety (onfarmfoodsafety.rutgers.edu)