Fruit Crops Edition

Seasonal updates on diseases, insects, weeds impacting tree fruit and small fruit (blueberry, cranberry, and wine grape). Fruit Pest Alerts are also available via this category feed.
 
Subscriptions are available via EMAIL and RSS.

Fruit IPM Report for Week of 5/18/2026

Temperatures early in the week were hot, with highs in the low to mid 90s °F, before cooling later in the week and into the weekend, when temperatures hung in the mid to upper 50s °F. Cooler temperatures over the weekend were accompanied by approximately 1-2 inches of rain.

At this stage, surviving fruitlets are becoming easier to identify, although some additional drop is still expected in the next month. Growers are encouraged to continue evaluating blocks carefully before making management decisions throughout the season.

Despite reduced crop potential, continued monitoring and management remain important, particularly in blocks with surviving fruit or where maintaining tree health and supporting return bloom for the 2027 season are priorities. See the recent post from Rutgers Extension Specialists and Cooperative Extension on Managing orchards with through a season with limited yields.

Apples
Disease Management Considerations

Apple Scab: Primary scab season is approaching the end, or has ended. Any established lesions from the primary scab infection period can continue to drive secondary spread if not controlled. Recent wetting events can support disease spread, but the upcoming forecast is relatively dry, which should limit additional infection risk in the short term. Growers should continue to monitor conditions and maintain coverage with Mancozeb or Captan plus a single-site fungicide, particularly where primary infections may have occurred. Keep in mind that Mancozeb has a 77-day pre-harvest interval (PHI).

Cedar apple rust: Rust is active at this time. Even if you have a low to no apple crop, apple rust and scab still need to be managed. Maintain coverage with mancozeb until the end of May.

Powdery mildew: Leaves with powdery mildew were observed this week, and the risk for infection remains active under dry conditions (Figure 1). Mancozeb is not effective. In periods of hot days with high humidity and no rain, sulfur (e.g., Microthiol Dispers at 10 lb/A) can be applied. PM needs to be managed through July. Do not tank mix captan and sulfur.

Powdery mildew developing on leaves in apple. Photo by Sophia Solewater.

Figure 1. Powdery mildew is developing on the leaves of the apple. Photo by Sophia Solewater.

Fire blight: Symptoms began appearing in southern county apple orchards the week of 5/11. Products such as Apogee or Kudos are highly recommended to help slow the spread of infections. Repeated applications may be necessary to help control shoot blight from previous blossom infections or leftover cankers in the trees. It is recommended to cut out infected limbs 6–12 inches below the margin of visible infection. Ideally, infected tissue should be removed from the orchard and burned. However, if pressed for time, prunings can be left in the row middles to dry out and subsequently chopped with a mower. Do not cut out infections during wet weather, as bacteria can spread through water.

Rots: In orchards with fruit, management moving forward will focus on summer diseases, including fruit rots like bitter rot, sooty blotch, and fly speck. Broad-spectrum fungicides captan and ziram are effective, and adding single-site products such as Merivon, Luna Sensation, Pristine, Omega, and Aprovia may improve control. The addition of phosphorous acid products such as Prophyt or Rampart to captan sprays can improve control of rots and other summer diseases such as sooty blotch and flyspeck, and may help suppress scab infections where present.

Marssonina Blotch, Glomerella Leaf Spot, and Frogeye Leaf Spot: These diseases should be managed, as they will cause defoliation and provide a source of inoculum for black rot and bitter rot next season.  Maintain coverage of captan, manzate, or ziram prior to rain events through the growing season according to the cover spray rule of applications every 2” of rain or 14 days, whichever comes first.

Insect Update

Insect management programs should be adjusted this season to account for reduced crop load in many orchards. In blocks with little to no fruit, many early-season insect pests will not require treatment; however, monitoring should continue, and management should be maintained where pests threaten tree health or next year’s crop.

Rosy apple aphid: Activity has been very low to start this season. RAA can feed extensively on foliage and terminals, causing leaf curling and stunting. This can impact next year’s fruit that will be set this season. Without fruit, the trees may tolerate a higher threshold of these pests, but they should still be managed. Monitor for colonies during bloom and use a treatment threshold of 1 colony/tree at petal fall.

Woolly Apple Aphid (WAA); Green Apple (Spirea) Aphids (GAA): Aphid colonies are being observed in some apple blocks (Figure 2). WAA and GAA are generally pests that can be tolerated because they cause little direct damage. Treatment thresholds for WAA and GAA are met if 50% of the shoots are infested with no beneficial insects present. Movento will control WAA and GAA and should control scale when applied in mid-May, and suppress scale when applied in late May or early June.

Figure 2b. Green apple aphid colonies on younger branches.

Figure 2a. Woolly apple aphid colonizing pruned wood.

Ambrosia Beetle: Trap captures have decreased in southern NJ, indicating peak flight has ended or is coming to an end. In northern NJ counties, trap captures have been increasing with last week’s warm temperatures. Infested trees should be showing signs of stress or will soon. If you have had a history of this pest in your orchard, you should begin scouting for damage and flag any trees that have been attacked for continued monitoring.

Codling Moth (CM): Biofix has been set for southern counties as of April 20 and in northern counties as of 5/5. In blocks with little to no crop, CM management programs can often be reduced or delayed; however, monitoring should continue. Where mating disruption has been employed or there is a reduced insecticide program, supplemental Madex applications can be made at the timings listed below if the threshold exceeds 5 moths per trap per week.

Codling Moth Degree Day Timing
Application and Insecticide Type
County Area Biofix Rimon:

75-100DD + 14-17 days later

 

Intrepid

150 + 450 DD

Diamides – Altacor, Voliam mixes: (150-200 DD)

Madex

250 DD + every 7-9 days during brood hatch (later if first spray is an IGR)

Standard Insecticides –  Delegate, Avaunt, OP’s, carbamates, pyrethroids

250 DD + 550 DD

 

DD 75 100 150 450 250 250 550
Southern April 20 Past Past Past 5/29 past Past 6/4
Northern  May 5 Past Past Past 6/4 5/21 5/21 Too far off

Leafhoppers: Adult leafhoppers typically begin appearing in apples this time of year. They appear as small, light-green, soft-bodied insects and are often found on the new leaves at the growing tips. High densities should not be tolerated in non-bearing orchards because they can stunt the growth of new shoots. They should also not be tolerated in orchards where fire blight is present, as they have been shown to spread the disease. Neonicotinoids are generally recommended for control; however, other broad-spectrum materials are also effective. 

Dogwood borer: Monitoring traps have captured high numbers of male dogwood borer adults, particularly in orchards with a history of the pest. Mating disruption is recommended and effective for this pest. Manage as needed in blocks with a history of infestation. Assail has demonstrated activity when targeting adults to reduce egg laying. See the 2026 Integrated Orchard Management Guide for Commercial Apples in the Southeast.

Traps

Average Trap Captures in Apple – Southern Counties

  Week STLM TABM CM OFM DWB AMBROSIA BEETLE
5/11/2026 18  11  6 3   25   2
5/18/2026 16 22 3 10   54 13

 

Average Trap Captures in Apple – Northern Counties

  Week STLM TABM CM DWB AMBROSIA BEETLE
5/11/2026 13.7  1.5  1.8   12.8   1.1
5/18/2026 8.3 13.25  2.4   18.5 10.8

Pears
Disease Management

Fabraea Leaf Spot: Spots have been observed on leaves in orchards (Figure 3). Infections can result in significant leaf spotting, defoliation, and unmarketable fruit. Foliar diseases should be managed with Mancozeb or Ziram, plus a single-site fungicide, to maintain pressure and inoculum at low levels, protecting fruit and maintaining a healthy orchard going into the next season. See the New Jersey Commercial Tree Fruit Production Guide for more information.

Fabraea leaf spot on foliage in pear. Photo by Katrina DeWitt.

Figure 3. Fabraea leaf spot on foliage in pear. Photo by Katrina DeWitt.

Insect Update

Pear psylla: Second generation pear psylla adults and eggs have been observed in southern counties. Pear Psylla are still actively laying eggs, and nymphs continue to hatch. Options for control include Actara, Assail, and Belay (IRAC group 4A); Sivanto Prime (IRAC group 4D); Delegate (IRAC Group 5); and products containing abamectin (IRAC group 6). Other options include Movento (IRAC Group 23). The addition of 0.25-1 gal of summer oil may improve control. Be sure to read and follow the label instructions for adding penetrants to these products.

Plum curculio; Stink bug; Tarnished plant bug: While activity during scouting may appear low, injury is being observed and may be more pronounced in orchards where reduced crop load is present. If high amounts of injury are observed and you intend to harvest the crop, consider a well-timed application of an IRAC Group 4A (Actara, Assail, and Belay).

Peaches
Disease Management

Given the widespread crop loss in many orchards, disease management programs should be adjusted accordingly. With little to no fruit present in most blocks, emphasis should shift away from fruit protection and toward maintaining tree health and reducing inoculum for next season.

Peach scab: In orchards without a history of high disease pressure, scab is generally not a concern in the absence of fruit. In blocks with a history of scab, lesions can still develop on current-season shoots and serve as inoculum for next year. In these situations, a reduced program may be warranted, with Captan applications timed ahead of significant rainfall events.

Bacterial spot: Leaf symptoms began appearing in orchards earlier in May. Leaf infections appear water-soaked, stay within the leaf veins, and gradually darken. Eventually, the chlorotic tissue abscises from the leaf, leaving a “shot-hole”. Copper injury appears similar. The main differences are that copper injury often appears at the leaf base, where the spray collects as it runs off, and the shot-hole will cross leaf veins. Copper injury often appears red at the margins of the shot hole. Fruit injury from bacterial spot results in dark lesions that are often accompanied by gummosis. Maintain low-rate copper programs to protect foliage and reduce inoculum for future seasons. Particularly important in blocks with a history of bacterial spot or under warm, wet conditions. Avoid combining copper with captan, especially following extended cloudy or slow-drying conditions.

Rusty spot and brown rot: Not a concern in blocks with little to no fruit. Fungicide applications targeting these diseases can be eliminated in most orchards this season unless there is a crop to protect. See the New Jersey Commercial Tree Fruit Production Guide for more information.

Insect Update

Insect management programs for peaches and nectarines should be adjusted this season due to reduced crop load. In blocks with little to no fruit, many fruit-feeding pests will not require treatment; however, monitoring should continue, and management should focus on pests that impact tree health or future production.

Oriental Fruit Moth (OFM): A biofix point for OFM was set on 4/7 for southern counties and 4/15 in northern counties. All treatments for the second generation have passed. We have seen very little flagging in new leaf tissue where OFM larvae have bored into.

Scale: White peach scale and San Jose scale crawlers begin to emerge at this time and will continue to emerge for up to 6 weeks. Control options during crawler emergence include Neonicotinoids (suppression only), Sivanto, Esteem, and Centaur.

Green Peach Aphid: Activity has been low to start this season, but is increasing with warmer temperatures. Examine trees for the presence of aphids by counting the number of colonies on ten trees and use a treatment threshold of 2 colonies/tree at petal fall for peach, and 1 colony/tree for nectarine. Management options include Assail, Actara, Admire Pro, or Sivanto.

Plum Curculio: Injury to developing peaches and apples has been observed in southern counties, with high infestation rates in orchards with a history of high pest pressure. Management for PC is not recommended at this time since adults are not currently active.

Tarnished plant bugs and other catfacing insects: Activity is increasing with dry weather and summer temperatures. Very little recent fruit feeding has been observed. In most blocks with little to no fruit, treatment is not necessary.

Lesser and Greater Peach Tree Borers: Growers using mating disruption for borer control should have them in place by mid-May. Even in orchards with little fruit, borers will need to be managed to maintain healthy tree stands for the next season. If this has been a historical pest in your orchard, mating disruption is recommended. Continue monitoring and managing as usual in problem blocks with mating disruption or trunk sprays.

Traps

Average Trap Captures in Peach – Southern Counties

  Week OFM TABM LPTB PTB
5/11/2026 5 10
5/18/2026 4 20

 

Average Trap Captures in Peach – Northern Counties

  Week OFM LPTB PTB
5/11/2026 4.4 24 0
5/18/2026 2.4 16.5 0.2

 

Blueberries
Diseases
Infected corolla tissue attached to developing fruit. Photo by Karlton Neidigh.

Figure 4. Infected corolla tissue is attached to the developing fruit. Photo by Karlton Neidigh.

During scouting activities this past week, low levels of Alternaria and Botrytis were observed on corolla tissue (Figure 4). Although disease incidence remained low, both pathogens were present in the field. Moving forward, fungicide programs should include products with activity against Anthracnose, Alternaria, and Botrytis. Anthracnose remains the primary disease concern at this time; however, given the recent weather conditions, an increase in disease development on corolla tissue still attached to the fruit would not be unexpected.

For management recommendations, refer to the Rutgers Commercial Blueberry Guide: https://njaes.rutgers.edu/pubs/publication.php?pid=e265

Insect Update

Scouting activities were conducted last week across 165 commercial and organic blueberry fields in Burlington and Atlantic Counties. Monitoring of leafrollers, spongy moth, plum curculio, and thrips shows an overall decrease in insect activity (Table 1) and corresponding injury to developing fruit (Table 2), most likely due to recent insecticide applications after petal fall.

 

Table 1. Beating Tray Sampling Data

Leafrollers Spongy Moth Plum Curculio Thrips
Avg High Avg High Avg High Avg High
4/17 0.0649 2 0.0001 0.1 0.0686 2.5 0.5547 9
4/25 0.0801 0.8 0.0001 0.1 0.1156 3 1.0383 26
5/1 0.1 0.8 0.0007 0.1 0.15 3 2.38 39
5/9 0.08 0.7 0 0 0.245 4.5 1.89 37
5/16 0.04 0.7 0.0007 0.1 0.117 3.5 5.02 99
5/23 0.006 0.3 0.0006 0.1 0.016 0.5 3.43 142

 

Table 2. Fruit Sampling Data

% Injury of Fruit by Leafroller % Injury of Fruit by Plum Curculio
Avg High Avg High
5/9 0.125 1 0.235 2.6
5/16 0.22 1.5 0.67 6.5
5/23 0.04 0.9 0.125 5.8

 

Plum Curculio: On average, scouts found 0.125 fruit with plum curculio scars per 10 bushes, with some fields reaching as high as 5.8 injured fruit per 10 bushes.

 

Aphids: Aphid activity has been detected in some scouted fields; however, colony sizes remain small, averaging 1–5 aphids per shoot (Table 3).

 

Table 3: Aphid Infestation on New Terminals

Aphids % Terminal Infestation
Avg High
5/23 1.5 14

 

Cranberry fruitworm and cherry fruitworm: Traps were checked last week. Activity was detected for cranberry fruitworm, while cherry fruitworm activity continues to increase, indicating that adults are still in flight and mating (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Fruitworm Trap Data

Cranberry  Fruitworm (AC) Cherry Fruitworm (AC) Cranberry Fruitworm (BC) Cherry Fruitworm (BC)
Avg High Avg High Avg High Avg High
5/1 0 0 2.5 5 0 0 3.5 7
5/9 0 0 4.4 6 0 0 6.25 10
5/16 0 0 7.7 11 0 0 9 15
5/23 0.14 1 5.14 15 0.25 1 16 29
AC: Atlantic County, BC: Burlington County

 

Scale insects: Traps were set to monitor Putnam scale and terrapin scale. Scales in the crawler stage are beginning to become active (Table 5).

 

Table 5. Scale Insect Trap Data

Putnam Terrapin
Avg High Avg High
5/23 36.85 230 1.8 8

Management recommendations can be found on the current Blueberry Bulletin and Commercial Blueberry Pest Control Recommendations for New Jersey.

Grapes
Grape Phenology

Grape development across New Jersey has progressed, with most vineyards in southern counties moving through to pre-bloom, depending on variety and site conditions.

Damage is most apparent in low-lying or frost-prone sites, where primary shoots may have been injured or killed. In these situations, secondary buds are beginning to push and may help compensate for some crop loss, though overall yield may still be reduced depending on the extent of primary bud injury.

At this stage, vineyards should be assessed for primary and secondary bud viability and uniformity of growth. Blocks with uneven development may require adjustments in management timing over the coming weeks.

Concord grapes were recorded in bloom on 5/19.

Diseases

The most important diseases to manage at this time are Phomopsis, black rot, downy mildew, and powdery mildew. More information on early-season disease control can be found in this blog post by Dr. Mizuho Nita at Virginia Tech. Recommended materials can be found in the New Jersey Commercial Grape Production Guide.

Insect Update

Insect pests to monitor are the grape flea beetle and the climbing cutworms. Controls for these insects are rarely needed. Spotted lanternfly nymphs are emerging in southern counties and will continue to hatch over the next few weeks. Insecticide applications are generally not recommended to control SLF nymphs. Due to the April freeze, the vines are under stress; therefore, a well-timed insecticide application to manage other key pests can knock down nymph populations.

Grape berry moth: Adults continue to be trapped in pheromone traps in vineyards where there is surrounding pressure from wild grapes. Insecticide timings will target control of later generations of grape berry moth in vineyards infesting developing fruit bunches. Using January 1st as a biofix, insecticide timing to target second generation will be 1200-1400 DD base 47°F. Use the NEWA model for grape berry moth to inform management timing for local populations, and refer to the Commercial Grape Pest Control recommendations for New Jersey.

Networks to Reduce Risk: Field trip to Montclair Community Farms and Program Wrap up

Join us on Saturday, June 13, 2026, for the final event of the Networks to Reduce Risk: Building Viable NJ Farms program! We’re celebrating with a special field trip to Montclair Community Farms from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. This fun wrap‑up event offers a great chance to explore urban agriculture, learn about sustainability and community food systems, and connect with fellow participants. Light snacks and refreshments will be provided, and it’s the perfect opportunity to take photos and close out the program together. Registration is just $5—save your spot today! You can register at: https://go.rutgers.edu/lxjqrrv7

Blunt-nosed Leafhopper in Cranberries (22 May 2026)

By: Yahel Ben-Zvi and Cesar Rodriguez-Saona

Rutgers P.E. Marucci Center

New Jersey cranberry growers are increasingly concerned about rising populations of the blunt-nosed leafhopper (BNLH). This increase is likely associated with shifts in pest management strategies, including the adoption of reduced-risk insecticides and decreased use of broad-spectrum products, as well as the expansion of high-yielding cranberry varieties. BNLH is particularly problematic because it transmits a phytoplasma—a type of bacterium that causes false blossom disease (Figure 1). Symptoms of this disease include stunted growth, deformed and sterile flowers that point upward, and a characteristic branching of upright shoots known as witches’ broom.

Figure 1. Cranberry false blossom disease symptoms in mid-May. Note the clustered branching of ‘witches’ broom’, erect and sterile flower buds, and more redness in the leaves. Photo by Yahel Ben-Zvi.

Life Cycle

BNLH has one generation per year (Figure 2). Its eggs overwinter embedded in cranberry stems and begin hatching in early May. Nymphs pass through five instars over approximately two months. Adults emerge in early July, peak in mid- to late July, and decline by the first week of August (Figure 3). Adults are characterized by their distinctive blunt heads and vary in color from light yellowish-gray to dark brown. Egg laying occurs between July and August.

Damage

Nymphs and adults feed on cranberry plant sap using their piercing-sucking mouthparts. Although direct feeding causes little visible damage, BNLH is an important pest because it serves as a vector of the phytoplasma that causes false blossom disease.

Management

At this time of year, early-instar nymphs should be active (Figure 2). Here are some guidelines to consider when managing BNLH in cranberries:

  1. Identify Infestation Sites: The key to effective BNLH control is identifying infestation sites. The most reliable method for monitoring this insect is the use of a sweep net. Before bloom, use sweep nets to collect nymphs. Because nymphs are small and difficult to see, bag and freeze the samples to kill them, then count the nymphs using a microscope or magnifying lens.
  2. Sweep Net Monitoring: Perform sweep sets consisting of 25 sweeps each. The recommended number of sweep sets is:
    • 1 per acre

      Figure 2. An early-instar blunt-nosed leafhopper nymph in mid-May. Photo by Yahel Ben-Zvi.

    • At least 10 sweep sets for 10–20 acres
    • 1 sweep set per 2 acres for areas larger than 20 acres
  3. Lack of Economic Thresholds: Establishing an economic threshold for BNLH is difficult because the proportion of phytoplasma-infected individuals within BNLH populations is unknown and may vary by cranberry variety and location. Notably, higher infection rates have been observed in newer varieties, even when BNLH populations are low.
  4. Control Measures: Management decisions should be based on BNLH population trends relative to previous years, the history of insecticide applications, and the cranberry variety grown. If BNLH populations are increasing compared to prior seasons and beds have not been treated for BNLH during the past 2–3 years, treatment should be considered.
  5. Treatment Options: If treatment is necessary, consider the following options for managing BNLH:
    • Timing: The best time for insecticide applications is before bloom to target young nymphs.
    • Insecticide Options:
      • Organophosphates: Diazinon (diazinon), Orthene (acephate)
      • Carbamates: Sevin (carbaryl)
      • Pyrethroids: Fanfare or Brigade (bifenthrin), Danitol (fenpropathrin)

        Figure 3. Life cycle of the blunt-nosed leafhopper. Drawing by Lindsay Lindhult.

      • Neonicotinoids: Assail (acetamiprid), Actara (thiamethoxam)
        Note: Use neonicotinoids with caution before bloom because of their potential negative effects on pollinators. These systemic insecticides can accumulate in pollen and nectar, posing risks to bees.
      • Sulfoximines: Transform (sulfoxaflor). Although effective in small-plot trials at the P.E. Marucci Center, additional data are needed to confirm efficacy at larger commercial scales.
    • Although not scientifically proven, there are claims that Orthene and Sevin may reduce pollinator activity by repelling bees.
    • Rotate insecticides with different modes of action to help prevent the development of resistance in pest populations.

Vineyard Management Following Freeze Injury and Reduced Crop Potential 

Vineyard Management Following Freeze Injury and Reduced Crop Potential
What Caused the Widespread Freeze Injury?

The widespread freeze injury observed this spring followed several nights of below-freezing temperatures after unusually warm early-season conditions accelerated bud development throughout much of New Jersey. In many southern New Jersey production regions, temperatures dropped into the mid-20s°F, while in northern areas they were near or below 20°F. Clear skies and calm wind conditions likely intensified injury through radiational cooling and rapid heat loss from actively growing green tissue. Comparable freeze injury has been reported across much of the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic this season, particularly in vineyards.

Damage severity varied substantially across vineyards depending on location, topography, vine developmental stage, and cultivar. Low-lying frost pockets generally sustained more severe damage, while elevated sites and some coastal areas sustained less damage. Vineyards with vines still in earlier developmental stages often escaped damage more successfully than vineyards with actively expanding shoots and flower clusters. Even within the same vineyard block, damage may vary considerably depending on local elevation changes, air drainage, and cold-air movement patterns. Because of this, management decisions should be based on detailed observations and adjusted in light of remaining crop potential and vine recovery. Although crop loss is the immediate concern in many vineyards, freeze injury may also alter canopy development, nutrient demand, disease pressure, and long-term vine productivity.

Evaluating Freeze Injury and Vineyard Recovery

The full extent of freeze injury is not immediately apparent. Injured shoots and flower clusters may continue to deteriorate for several days after freezing temperatures, and growers should avoid making rapid assumptions about final crop loss immediately after injury. In many vineyards, much of the damage only becomes evident as secondary buds begin to emerge and fruit set progresses. Some vines that initially appeared heavily damaged may still yield partial crops through surviving secondary buds, while others may continue showing delayed injury symptoms over the coming weeks.

Fortunately, grapevines recover from freezes through shoot growth from secondary and tertiary buds within count buds, release from inhibition of basal buds, and development of adventitious shoots from latent buds. These features give vines the capacity for recovery after freeze events.

Primary buds are generally the most productive and account for the majority of crop production. When primary shoots are damaged or killed, secondary buds may emerge within days to weeks, depending on weather conditions and vine vigor. Although secondary shoots often produce smaller clusters and reduced yields, they may still contribute meaningfully to crop recovery in some cultivars. Figure 1 provides an example of freeze injury where a frost-killed shoot from the primary bud is accompanied by new development emerging from a surviving secondary bud.

Figure 1. The frost-killed young shoot (right) of Chambourcin and a new bud developing from the secondary bud (left).

Figure 1. The frost-killed young shoot (right) of Chambourcin and a new bud developing from the secondary bud (left). Photo by H. Gohil

 

In many Vitis vinifera cultivars, secondary shoots may support only a fraction of a normal crop. However, several hybrid cultivars may retain greater productivity following freeze injury.

When both primary and secondary buds are damaged, tertiary buds may still produce vegetative shoots. While tertiary growth and adventitious shoots generally contribute little or no fruit, they remain critically important for rebuilding the canopy and maintaining vine productivity for future seasons.

Vineyards may also contain both primary and secondary shoot-derived clusters on the same vine, contributing to uneven crop development and maturity (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Vidal Blanc, a shoot from the primary bud, had a typical cluster; on the same cordon, a shoot from the secondary bud had a smaller cluster.

Figure 2. Vidal Blanc, a shoot from the primary bud, had a typical cluster; on the same cordon, a shoot from the secondary bud had a smaller cluster. Photo by H. Gohil

As recovery continues, vineyards may contain a mixture of surviving primary shoots, secondary regrowth, and delayed vegetative growth. Uneven canopy development may complicate pest management, fungicide timing, canopy management, and harvest timing later in the season.

Growers should continue monitoring:

  • Primary and secondary shoot survival
  • Cluster development on secondary shoots
  • Variability within vineyard blocks
  • Low-lying frost pockets and delayed-growth areas
  • Trunk or cordon vascular injury
  • Sucker emergence and retraining potential
  • Overall vine vigor and canopy development

Management decisions may differ substantially among blocks depending on remaining crop potential.

Avoid Removing Frost-Damaged Shoots Prematurely

Although severely damaged shoots may appear unlikely to recover, removing frost-injured shoots too early often provides little benefit and may unintentionally reduce remaining crop potential.

In many situations, allowing vines time to recover naturally is the best approach, particularly when injury severity is still being assessed. Removal of damaged tissue too soon may eliminate secondary or latent buds capable of producing additional growth. Dead or injured tissues frequently dry and detach naturally over time without intervention.

Growers should therefore avoid making aggressive canopy removal decisions immediately after freeze injury unless tissue viability and recovery potential are clearly understood.

Vineyard Recovery Scenarios and Canopy Management Considerations

Primary Bud Loss with Secondary Regrowth

In vineyards where primary shoots were largely lost, growers should allow time for secondary buds to push before making major management decisions. Depending on temperatures and vine vigor, secondary shoots may emerge within days to weeks following injury.

Although crop potential will often be reduced, canopy development may still recover relatively uniformly. Delayed development should be expected, and management programs may need to be adjusted according to new growth stages rather than original seasonal timelines.

Dead tissues often fall naturally and may not require immediate removal unless they interfere with vineyard operations or pose a disease risk.

Partial Shoot Injury

Freeze injury is often uneven, even on the same vine. Some shoots may experience leaf injury while retaining healthy shoot tips and continue to grow normally. In these situations, little intervention may be necessary.

Figure 3. Epical meristem is actively growing (left) in Marquette and completely frost-damaged in Chardonnay (Right)

Figure 3. Epical meristem is actively growing (left) in Marquette and completely frost-damaged in Chardonnay (Right). Photos by H. Gohil

However, when shoot tips are killed, continued development may stop, and secondary buds near the base of shoots may begin to grow instead. Vineyard managers should carefully monitor which shoots remain viable and adjust canopy management accordingly. Careful evaluation of shoot tip survival can help determine whether shoots are likely to continue growing or whether regrowth from secondary buds should be expected (Figure 3).

Because vineyards frequently contain both surviving and injured shoots after freeze events, variability within rows and blocks should be expected.

Severe Injury and Cordon or Trunk Damage

In some vineyards, no primary, secondary, or tertiary growth may emerge from portions of the vine, indicating more substantial injury to cordons or vascular tissues. In these situations, strong suckers emerging from the trunk may offer opportunities for retraining vines for future production. Although current-season yields may be lost, maintaining healthy vegetative growth remains critical for long-term vineyard recovery and productivity.

Shoot Thinning Requires a Different Approach This Year

Canopy management recommendations following freeze injury may differ substantially from those of a normal season. Under normal conditions, shoot thinning improves airflow, reduces canopy density, and enhances fruit quality. However, in freeze-damaged vineyards, excessive shoot removal too early may unintentionally increase vine vigor and promote overly vegetative “bull cane” growth with limited fruitfulness. Retaining additional shoots may reduce excess vigor, help balance vine growth, and preserve vine structure for next season. Decisions regarding thinning should therefore be adjusted according to cultivar, remaining crop potential, pruning system, vine vigor, and recovery patterns.

Nitrogen Management Following Freeze Injury

One of the key management questions following widespread freeze injury is whether vineyard nitrogen (N) programs should be adjusted under reduced crop conditions.

In many New Jersey vineyards, nitrogen applications are not made annually and are often applied only every 3 to 5 years. Excessive vine vigor is frequently a greater concern than nitrogen deficiency, particularly in seasons with abundant precipitation. In addition, vineyard soils with moderate to high organic matter often provide substantial nitrogen through natural mineralization. As a general guideline, approximately 20 pounds of nitrogen per acre may become available annually for each 1% soil organic matter.

Following freeze injury, nitrogen demand may be substantially altered due to reduced fruit load. In vineyards where primary buds were lost and crop potential has been significantly reduced, nitrogen requirements are also likely lower than in a typical production year.

Excess nitrogen application under low-crop conditions may unintentionally stimulate excessive vegetative growth, resulting in overly vigorous canopies and increased management challenges later in the season. Excessive vigor may also reduce winter hardiness and negatively affect vine acclimation as vines enter dormancy.

Growers should therefore avoid making automatic nitrogen applications before crop potential becomes clearer.

Where petiole analysis from previous seasons indicated nitrogen deficiency, some nitrogen inputs may still be warranted. However, management decisions should be adjusted according to expected yield, vine vigor, and vineyard history.

It is also important to remember that much of the nitrogen supporting early-season growth from bud break through bloom originates from reserves already stored within the vine. Because of this, immediate nitrogen applications following freeze injury are generally unlikely to improve short-term recovery.

Nitrogen applications are typically timed from approximately two weeks before bloom through two weeks after bloom. In freeze-affected vineyards this season, delaying nitrogen decisions until bloom may allow growers to better evaluate secondary bud survival, crop recovery, and overall fruit potential before making fertility adjustments.

Reduced fruit load means reduced nitrogen demand. In many vineyards affected by freeze injury, a conservative nitrogen management approach may help avoid excessive vigor while supporting long-term vine health and winter hardiness.

Weed Management Following Freeze Injury 

The goal during a low- or no-crop year is not to maintain a completely weed-free vineyard floor, but to reduce perennial weed populations, prevent annual weed seed production, manage excessive vine vigor, and prepare for the following season. 

Low crop years provide a unique opportunity to address persistent weed problems that are often difficult to manage during seasons with normal fruit production. With reduced concerns about immediate crop losses, vineyard managers can shift their focus from protecting current yield to improving long-term vineyard floor management and reducing future weed pressure. 

Prioritizing Perennial Weed Management 

Perennial weeds should be the primary target during low-production years. Effective suppression of species such as mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), or goldenrod (Solidago spp.) typically requires a multi-year management approach. A season with little or no crop presents an ideal opportunity to target these species when they are actively growing and most susceptible to control measures. Directed applications of systemic herbicides or repeated mowing may help reduce underground reserves and limit re-establishment in subsequent years. 

Rethinking Annual Weed Management 

Unlike perennial weeds, annual weeds may not require complete season-long suppression during a low crop year. Moderate levels of annual weed growth within the row can provide some competition for water and nutrients, potentially helping to moderate excessive vine vigor that frequently develops when crop load is substantially reduced or absent. Excessive vegetative growth can increase canopy management requirements, reduce spray penetration, and create favorable conditions for disease development. For this reason, vineyard managers may be able to tolerate greater annual weed presence than would normally be acceptable in a full-crop season, provided weeds are prevented from producing seed. Mowing and mechanical suppression may therefore become more important management tools than repeated postemergence herbicide applications, particularly where annual weed populations are not interfering with vineyard operations. 

Preparing for the Following Season 

Although some annual weed competition may be acceptable during the growing season, vineyard floors should be as free of weeds as possible by late summer and early fall. Clean vineyard rows improve the effectiveness of fall weed management programs and allow timely application of residual herbicides where appropriate. Reducing existing vegetation before fall applications can improve soil coverage and help establish a cleaner vineyard floor entering the 2027 growing season. 

Scouting and Mapping Problem Areas 

Low crop years also provide an excellent opportunity to scout vineyards and document the location of troublesome perennial weed infestations. Mapping species composition and problem areas can improve future management decisions, facilitate site-specific applications, and help prioritize areas requiring more intensive intervention in subsequent seasons. Investments made in weed management during a low-production year can provide benefits that extend well beyond a single season.

Disease Management Following Freeze Injury

Although immediate concerns following freeze events often focus on crop loss, freeze injury can substantially alter disease risk throughout the growing season. Damaged shoots and leaves are more vulnerable to infection once warm, wet conditions return, while wounds in shoots and permanent wood may provide entry points for pathogens such as Botrytis and grapevine trunk diseases.

Even when crop potential is limited, disease management remains important. Maintaining healthy foliage supports carbohydrate storage, winter hardiness, and next year’s productivity. Disease priorities may shift away from fruit protection and toward preserving canopy health and minimizing inoculum for future seasons.

Remember, long-term vineyard health is the goal this season. Managing diseases that cause defoliation and negatively affect grapevine health remains critical, even in vineyards with little or no harvestable crop.

Key diseases to continue monitoring include:

  • Downy mildew
  • Powdery mildew
  • Black rot
  • Botrytis bunch rot
  • Phomopsis cane and leaf spot
  • Anthracnose in susceptible cultivars

Dense regrowth following freeze injury may increase canopy humidity and prolong leaf wetness periods, creating favorable conditions for disease development. Good canopy airflow and spray penetration remain important, and practices such as shoot positioning and, if needed, selective thinning may help improve canopy conditions. Management decisions should continue to be guided by vineyard history, weather conditions, canopy density, and ongoing regrowth patterns rather than calendar timing alone.

Insect Management Considerations Following Freeze Injury

Although freeze injury may substantially reduce crop potential, insect management should not be abandoned entirely. Reduced fruit load does not necessarily reduce insect pressure, and some pests may still negatively affect vine health, vegetative growth, or future productivity.

In vineyards with limited or no crop, management priorities may shift away from fruit protection and toward preserving canopy health, minimizing vine stress, and maintaining productive vines for future seasons. Continued scouting remains essential, particularly as secondary and tertiary growth emerges following freeze injury.

Growers should continue monitoring for key vineyard pests, including:

  • Grape berry moth
  • Japanese beetle
  • Spotted lanternfly
  • Phylloxera in susceptible vineyards
  • Leafhoppers and other sap-feeding insects
  • Mites during hot, dry periods
  • Grape flea beetle and climbing cutworms where injury is present

Secondary shoots and delayed regrowth may remain susceptible to feeding injury throughout the season, particularly when vines are already stressed from freeze damage. Insect feeding on recovering canopies may further reduce photosynthetic capacity and negatively affect carbohydrate storage needed for winter survival and next season’s productivity.

At the same time, reduced crop potential may allow greater flexibility in treatment thresholds in some situations. Vineyard managers should continue making management decisions based on scouting observations, pest pressure, remaining crop potential, and overall vine recovery rather than relying solely on calendar-based schedules.

Spotted lanternfly (SLF) deserves particular attention in freeze-affected vineyards. Heavy feeding by large populations can place additional stress on vines already recovering from freeze injury. Vineyards with a history of SLF pressure should continue monitoring and management efforts where warranted.

Even in vineyards with little or no fruit, maintaining healthy foliage remains important. Protecting functional canopy growth throughout the season will help support carbohydrate storage, winter hardiness, and productive growth in future years.

Final Considerations

As vineyard recovery continues over the coming weeks, management programs will likely need to remain flexible. The full extent of freeze injury may not become apparent until secondary growth progresses and crop potential becomes clearer.

Management decisions should therefore be adjusted based on remaining crop potential, canopy recovery, vine vigor, and vineyard-specific conditions rather than standard seasonal assumptions. Different blocks within the same vineyard may require substantially different approaches depending on injury severity and remaining productivity.

Even in vineyards with severely reduced crop potential, maintaining healthy foliage and vine structure remains critical for long-term productivity. Continued attention to canopy management, nutrient decisions, disease prevention, and insect scouting will help support carbohydrate storage, winter hardiness, and productive growth in future seasons.

Growers are encouraged to continue closely monitoring vineyard recovery and adjust management programs as the season progresses.

Fruit IPM Report for Week of 5/11/2026

 

Apples
Disease Management Considerations
  • Apple scab symptoms are now appearing in some orchards as secondary infections (Figure 1).

    Early onset of scab symptoms on apple leaves. Photo by Kaitlin Quinn.

    Figure 1. Early onset of scab symptoms on apple leaves. Photo by Kaitlin Quinn.

  • Primary scab season is coming to an end or has ended.
  • Rust and powdery mildew infections are also a risk during this time.
  • These diseases need to be managed, even if you have little to no apple crop, to maintain healthy trees and keep inoculum low going into next season. A conservative spray program can focus on broad-spectrum fungicides, such as mancozeb, captan, ziram, and sulfur. Mancozeb is the only broad-spectrum product to control rust, while sulfur is the only broad-spectrum product to control powdery mildew.

    Fire blight strike in apple. Photo by Karlton Raines-Neidigh.

    Figure 2. Fire blight strike in apple. Photo by Karlton Raines-Neidigh.

  • Marssonina Blotch, Glomerella Leaf Spot, and Frogeye Leaf Spot should be managed, as they will cause defoliation and provide a source of inoculum for black rot and bitter rot next season.  Maintain coverage of captan, manzate, or ziram prior to rain events through the growing season according to the cover spray rule of applications every 2” of rain or 14 days, whichever comes first.
  • For those who have fruit on their trees, there are additional fungicide options to consider, particularly to manage bitter rot, sooty blotch & flyspeck. Products such as Merivon, Luna Sensation, Inspire Super, Omega, and Aprovia are effective and can be combined or rotated with broad-spectrum fungicides such as captan and ziram for sustained control.
  • Fire Blight:
    • Fire blight strikes are developing in orchards statewide (Figure 2).
    • Products such as Apogee or Kudos are highly recommended to help slow the spread of infections. Repeated applications may be necessary to help control shoot blight from previous blossom infections or leftover cankers in the trees.
    • If there is still some bloom, apply antibiotics when infection events are forecasted using the NEWA fire blight model.
    • Remember to rotate streptomycin and oxytetracycline products.
    • If symptoms appear, it is generally recommended to cut out infected limbs and remove them from the orchard when possible; however, this is a practical decision that must be made on a case-by-case basis.
Insect Update

Insect management programs should be adjusted this season to account for reduced crop load in many orchards. In blocks with little to no fruit, many early-season insect pests will not require treatment; however, monitoring should continue, and management should be maintained where pests threaten tree health or next year’s crop.

  • Rosy apple aphid activity has been very low to start this season. RAA can feed extensively on foliage and terminals, causing leaf curling and stunting. This can impact next year’s fruit that will be set this season. Without fruit, the trees may tolerate a higher threshold of these pests, but they should still be managed.
    • Monitor for colonies during bloom and use a treatment threshold of 1 colony/tree at petal fall.
  • Green Apple (Spirea) Aphids (GAA) colonies are being observed in some apple blocks. GAA is generally a pest that can be tolerated because it causes little direct damage.
    • Treatment thresholds for GAA are met if 50% of the shoots are infested with no beneficial insects present.
    • Movento will control GAA and should control scale when applied in mid-May, and suppress scale when applied in late May or early June.
  • Ambrosia Beetle
    • Trap captures have decreased across NJ, indicating peak flight has ended or is coming to an end.
    • Infested trees should be showing signs of stress or will soon.
    • If you have had a history of this pest in your orchard, you should begin scouting for damage and flag any trees that have been attacked for continued monitoring.
  • Codling Moth (CM)
    • A codling moth biofix was set in Southern counties on 4/20 and in Northern counties on 5/5. See the NJ Commercial Tree Fruit Production Guide for recommended materials and rates. Where Mating Disruption has been employed, supplemental Madex applications should be made at the timings listed below.
    • Codling Moth Degree Day Timing
      Application and Insecticide Type
      County Area Biofix Rimon:

      75-100DD + 14-17 days later

       

      Intrepid

      150 + 450 DD

      Diamides – Altacor, Voliam mixes: (150-200 DD)

      Madex

      250 DD + 7-10 days during brood hatch (later if first spray is an IGR)

      Standard Insecticides –  Delegate, Avaunt, OP’s, carbamates, pyrethroids

      250 DD + 550 DD

       

      DD 75 100 150 450 250 250 550
      Southern April 20 Past Past Past 6/1 5/18 5/18 Too far off
      Northern  May 5 5/12 5/14 5/17 Too far off 5/21 5/21 Too far off
  • Plum curculio, tarnished plant bug, stink bugs, BMSB, TABM, and OBLR:
    • In most blocks, treatment is not necessary where little to no fruit is present
    • The timing to treat plum curculio has passed.
  • Mites:
    • Continue to use standard thresholds through June
    • Maintaining healthy foliage is important for return bloom next season
Traps

Average Trap Captures in Apple – Southern Counties

  Week STLM TABM CM OFM DWB AMBROSIA BEETLE
5/11/2026 18  11  6 3   25   2

 

Average Trap Captures in Apple – Northern Counties

  Week STLM TABM CM DWB AMBROSIA BEETLE
5/11/2026 13.7  1.5  1.8   12.8   1.1

Pears
Disease Management
  • Fire blight remains a concern during warm and wet periods. Continue to protect actively growing shoots, particularly during warm, wet, or stormy conditions. In high-risk situations, oxytetracycline (e.g., Mycoshield, FireLine) may be used post-bloom to suppress shoot blight.
  • Maintain protectant fungicides (e.g., Mancozeb, Ziram) to control rust, scab, and Fabraea leaf spot, protecting foliage.
    • Use FRAC 3 and 7, and premix fungicides (e.g., Inspire Super, Merivon, Luna products) as needed for foliar disease control.
    • In blocks with little to no fruit, fungicide programs can often be reduced and focused on maintaining healthy foliage rather than fruit protection.
Insect Update
  • Second generation pear psylla adults and eggs have been observed in southern counties. Options for control include Actara, Assail, and Belay (IRAC group 4A); Sivanto Prime (IRAC group 4D); Delegate (IRAC Group 5); and products containing abamectin (IRAC group 6). Other options include Movento (IRAC Group 23). The addition of 0.25-1 gal of summer oil may improve control. Be sure to read and follow the label instructions for adding penetrants to these products.

Peaches
Disease Management

Given the widespread crop loss in many orchards, disease management programs should be adjusted accordingly. With little to no fruit present in most blocks, emphasis should

Bacterial leaf spot on peach

Figure 3. Bacterial leaf spot on peach

shift away from fruit protection and toward maintaining tree health and reducing inoculum for next season.

  • Peach scab:
    • In orchards without a history of high disease pressure, scab is generally not a concern in the absence of fruit
    • In blocks with a history of scab, lesions can still develop on current-season shoots and serve as inoculum for next year
    • In these situations, a reduced program may be warranted, with Captan applications timed ahead of significant rainfall events (e.g., ~2.5 lb/A)
  • Bacterial spot:
    • Leaf symptoms are showing in orchards (Figure 3).
    • Maintain low-rate copper programs to protect foliage and reduce inoculum for future seasons
    • Particularly important in blocks with a history of bacterial spot or under warm, wet conditions
    • Avoid combining copper with captan, especially following extended cloudy or slow-drying conditions
  • Rusty spot and brown rot:
    • Not a concern in blocks with little to no fruit
    • Fungicide applications targeting these diseases can be eliminated in most orchards this season unless there is a crop to protect.
Insect Update

Insect management programs for peaches and nectarines should be adjusted this season due to reduced crop load. In blocks with little to no fruit, many fruit-feeding pests will not require treatment; however, monitoring should continue, and management should focus on pests that impact tree health or future production.

Terminal flagging due to Oriental fruit moth.

Figure 4. Terminal flagging due to Oriental fruit moth.

Oriental Fruit Moth (OFM)

    • A biofix point for OFM was set on 4/7 for southern counties and 4/15 in northern counties.
    • The second insecticide timings for the first generation Oriental Fruit Moth have passed.
    • No insecticides are needed for OFM when mating disruption is implemented.
    • We have seen very few flagging in new leaf tissue where OFM larvae have bored into (Figure 4).
    OFM 1st Generation Timing
    Insecticide Type
    County/Region Degree Days by 5/18 base 45 Conventional

    170-200, 350-375

    Diamide

    100-150, 300-350

    Gloucester – Southern 556 1st –past

    2nd – past

    1st –past

    2nd –past

    Middlesex – Northern 456 1st –past

    2nd –5/13-5/15

     1st – past

    2nd –5/10-5/13

Scale

  • Beneficial insects may help suppress populations in many blocks
  • In orchards with a history of infestation, plan to target the crawler stage starting the third week of May and continue emergence until about the middle of June
  • Control options include materials such as Esteem or Centaur
  • Where scale is a recurring problem, Movento should be applied between petal fall and shuck split. A penetrant must be included with Movento as per the product label. Applications should be made at optimal temperature conditions. Movento will also control green peach aphid when used at this time.
  • Continue monitoring historically infested blocks and plan crawler management for later in the season if populations persist.

Green Peach Aphid

Plum Curculio

  • Injury to fruit has been observed on developing peaches and apples in southern counties.
  • Management in NJ typically requires weekly sprays for 3-4 weeks, beginning at petal-fall and continuing through approximately 300 DD50 after petal-fall.
  • Materials that cover PC and other key pests encountered at this time include Asana, Avaunt, Imidan, and Voliam Flexi.

Tarnished plant bugs and other catfacing insects

  • Activity has been low and is considered a low priority for management, where fruit is not present. If you plan to retain a crop, you must continue to manage insect pests intensively as you would in a normal season.

Lesser and Greater Peach Tree Borers

  • Growers using mating disruption for borer control should have them in place by mid-May.
  • Even in orchards with little fruit, borers will need to be managed to maintain healthy tree stands for the next season. If this has been a historical pest in your orchard, mating disruption is recommended.
  • Continue monitoring and managing as usual in problem blocks
Traps

Average Trap Captures in Peach – Southern Counties

  Week OFM TABM LPTB PTB
5/11/2026 5 10

 

Average Trap Captures in Peach – Northern Counties

  Week OFM LPTB PTB
5/11/2026 4.4 24 0

Blueberries
Blueberry Phenology

Early varieties are in the green fruit stage – the flowers have been pollinated, the petals are off, and the tiny green fruit are expanding.

Insect Update

Scouting activities were conducted last week across 139 commercial blueberry fields in Burlington and Atlantic Counties. Field evaluations focused on monitoring pest activity and crop development, including assessments of leafrollers, spongy moth, plum curculio, and thrips using beating tray samples, as well as fruit inspections for pest injury and developmental progress. All target pests were detected during scouting activities (Table 1).

Plum curculio numbers of adults on bushes has decreased over the past week, but some adults are still present. The average count was 0.117 per bush with a high of 3.5 adults per bush.

Thrips numbers increased from previous weeks. The main concern comes from the potential for thrips injury to flowers and developing fruit. After bloom, thrips can feed on young blueberry foliage causing curling of leaves; however, the risk of injury to developing leaves and fruit from thrips is low at this point.

In addition, monitoring of developing fruit indicated increasing feeding and/or oviposition activity by these pests (Table 2).

Table 1. Beating Tray Sampling Data

Leafrollers Spongy Moth Plum Curculio Thrips
Avg High Avg High Avg High Avg High
4/17 0.0649 2 0.0001 0.1 0.0686 2.5 0.5547 9
4/25 0.0801 0.8 0.0001 0.1 0.1156 3 1.0383 26
5/1 0.1 0.8 0.0007 0.1 0.15 3 2.38 39
5/9 0.08 0.7 0 0 0.245 4.5 1.89 37
5/16 0.04 0.7 0.0007 0.1 0.117 3.5 5.02 99

Table 2. Fruit Sampling Data

% Leafroller Berry Infestation % Plum Curculio Berry Infestation
Avg High Avg High
5/9 0.125 1 0.235 2.6
5/16 0.22 1.5 0.67 6.5

Trap Monitoring

Scale traps targeting Putnam and terrapin scale were monitored last week and captured very low numbers; therefore, no treatment is recommended at this time.

Cranberry and cherry fruitworm traps were also checked last week. No cranberry fruitworm activity was detected; however, captures of cherry fruitworm increased, indicating that adults are actively flying and mating (Table 3).

Table 3. Trap Sampling Data

Cranberry  Fruitworm (AC) Cherry Fruitworm (AC) Cranberry Fruitworm (BC) Cherry Fruitworm (BC)
Avg High Avg High Avg High Avg High
5/1 0 0 2.5 5 0 0 3.5 7
5/9 0 0 4.4 6 0 0 6.25 10
5/16 0 0 7.7 11 0 0 9 15
AC: Atlantic County, BC: Burlington County

Management recommendations can be found on the current Blueberry Bulletin and Commercial Blueberry Pest Control Recommendations for New Jersey.

Grapes
Grape Phenology

Grape development across New Jersey has progressed, with most vineyards in southern counties moving through to pre-bloom. In many areas, shoots are now between 1–6 inches, depending on variety and site conditions.

Damage is most apparent in low-lying or frost-prone sites, where primary shoots may have been injured or killed. In these situations, secondary buds are beginning to push (Figure 5) and may help compensate for some crop loss, though overall yield may still be reduced depending on the extent of primary bud injury.

At this stage, vineyards should be assessed for primary and secondary bud viability and uniformity of growth. Blocks with uneven development may require adjustments in management timing over the coming weeks.

Grapevines with secondary bud break.

Figure 5. Grapevines with secondary bud break.

Diseases
  • The most important diseases to manage at this time are Phomopsis, black rot, and powdery mildew.
  • More information on early-season disease control can be found in this blog post by Dr. Mizuho Nita at Virginia Tech.
Insect Update
  • Insect pests to monitor are the grape flea beetle and the climbing cutworms. Controls for these insects are rarely needed.
  • Spotted lanternfly nymphs are emerging in southern counties and will continue to hatch over the next few weeks (Figure 6).
    • Insecticide applications are generally not recommended to control SLF nymphs. Due to the April freeze, the vines are under stress; therefore, a well-timed insecticide application to manage other key pests can knock down nymph populations.

      Spotted lanternfly nymphs on grapevines.

      Figure 6. Spotted lanternfly nymphs on grapevines.

  • Grape berry moth adults continue to be trapped in pheromone traps in vineyards where there is surrounding pressure from wild grapes.

April 2026 Frost Damage in Fruit Crops Survey

We invite you to participate in a brief survey to better understand how April frost events have affected crop production, economic impact, and how growers are managing this risk. The information collected will help us assess the overall severity of the frost and compile broad, aggregated data to effectively communicate its impact to legislative offices and Farm Service Agency, and others.  Your input will help also inform research and Extension programs to support fruit growers in New Jersey better.

Please note that your responses are strictly confidential and will only be reported in aggregate. You should be 18 years or older and involved in fruit production to respond to this survey. Approximate time – 10-12 min.

Ready to start? Please click the link below:

https://rutgers.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_6zliIMszIABIRjU

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Seowoo Sophie Lee (seowoo.lee@rutgers.edu) or Hemant Gohil gohil@njaes.rutgers.edu

Thank you for your valuable time.

Sincerely,

This document was approved by the Rutgers University Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects on May 13, 2026.