Fruit Crops Edition

Seasonal updates on diseases, insects, weeds impacting tree fruit and small fruit (blueberry, cranberry, and wine grape). Fruit Pest Alerts are also available via this category feed.
 
Subscriptions are available via EMAIL and RSS.

Pre-Harvest Water Requirements Under the Produce Safety Rule

Note:  The following is a brief description of the pre-harvest water requirements (Section 112.3-112.161) under the Food Safety Modernization Act/Produce Safety Rule (FSMA/PSR).  The pre-harvest water requirements are complicated and this summary is intended to be a starting point while we wait for guidance from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  For those who have already taken the FSMA/PSR grower training we will host an update webinar in the fall.  For those who have not taken the FSMA/PSR grower training our course will be updated this year to reflect the latest information.

The pre-harvest water (irrigation, spray water, frost protection, fertigation, dust abatement, etc.) requirements for the FSMA/PSR became effective on July 5, 2024, however this does not mean a grower needed to start complying on that date.  Compliance dates are staggered over the next three years depending on the size of the operation.  Farms having an inspection in 2024 should expect Subpart E to be discussed by inspectors to prepare them for compliance in 2025 and beyond.:

Size of Operation Compliance Dates
Operations over $500,000 April 7, 2025
Small operations (> $250,000-500,000) April 6, 2026
Very Small operations (> $25,000-250,000) April 5, 2027

It is important to understand what is considered Agricultural Water. Water that is intended to or will likely touch produce is considered agricultural water. In the context of pre-harvest water that means any water you are using for irrigation, frost protection etc. that touches the crop. If you are using drip irrigation for staked tomatoes this is NOT agricultural water as the water is not touching the fruit. If you are using drip irrigation on carrots, this IS agricultural water, as the water is touching the crop.  A grower needs to think about how each water source is used before they decide whether it is agricultural water or not. If you have specific questions with regards to whether or not your water is agricultural water, please reach out to us.

Water testing is not a requirement for pre-harvest water but can be part of the agricultural water assessment of the whole water system.  This means an inspector will ask the grower to explain their system and how they minimize risks to the covered crops.

Requirements for Inspecting and Maintaining Agricultural Water Systems

As part of the rule, growers must inspect the whole water system (pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest) at the beginning of the season that is under the farms control.  This includes:

  • The water source (well and surface); the extent of the grower’s control and how each source is protected.
  • Use of adjacent and nearby land (e.g., horse or cattle farm next door; runoff from roads)
  • If surface water (e.g., stream, lake, or pond)- what is the chance a food safety hazard could enter the water before it got to your farm? (e.g., dairy farm upstream where cows get in the stream).

An inspection report must be written as to the findings of the inspection!

Requirements for Agricultural Water Assessment

 The rule requires that a pre-harvest water assessment must be completed at the beginning of the season, the assessment is different than an inspection!

  • The assessment only applies to the pre-harvest water.
  • Must be a written assessment dated and signed at the beginning of the season, annually or anytime major changes are made to the system or water source. The inspection report can be incorporated into the assessment.
  • Parts of the assessment
    • Location and nature of water source (e.g., ground water/wells, surface water/pond, stream, etc.)
    • How water is distributed (e.g., underground main, lay flat, canals, etc.)
    • How system is protected from contamination (animals, manure applications, etc.)
    • Agricultural water practices
  • How water is applied and time between last irrigation and harvest
  • Crop characteristics (e.g., waxy surface-cabbage, netted surface-muskmelons, etc.)
  • Environmental conditions (Damage from frost, hail, blowing sand, etc.)
  • Other factors
    • Water testing, but the assessment can not be based just on water testing. It is only part of the assessment.
  • If the operation meets any of the following, they can be exempt from performing a water assessment.
  • No untreated surface water applied.
  • Untreated groundwater is tested following the protocol for harvest and post-harvest water (four samples the first year for generic E. coli and one sample every year after if no generic E. coli is found).
  • Public water system water use.
  • Water is treated, monitored and to be of a safe and adequate sanitary quality.

Outcome from the assessment

  • If the water source is not safe or is not of adequate sanitary quality, you must stop use immediately and take corrective measures before use.
    • If the problem is related to biological soil amendments of animal or human origin on adjacent or nearby land, mitigation measures to stop and prevent the contamination must be implemented the same growing season (e.g., building a berm around the field to avoid runoff from a horse pasture).
    • Any other conditions not related to animal activity impacting the quality of the water must be remediated as soon as practical and no later than the following year. The other option is to test the water source as part of the assessment and implement changes if needed.

Corrective measures are activities that must be done before using the water source.  Such as re-inspecting the water system and making any changes or treating the water following FSMA/PSR standards.

Mitigation measures can take many forms including making a repair, increasing the time from the last irrigation to harvest, changing the water application method or source, etc.

Once we receive guidance from the FDA giving us greater details on how Subpart E impacts specific farm scenarios, we will share that information via the Plant and Pest Advisory.

EPA Releases Proposed Protections for Pesticide Malathion: Public Comment Period Opens

[USEPA OPP. 7/18/2024]. Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is releasing the Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision (PID) for the pesticide malathion. The PID proposes mitigation measures to reduce potential ecological risks. The malathion PID—as well as the revised Human Health Draft Risk Assessment and Ecological Draft Risk Assessment released earlier this year—will be […]

Tree Fruit IPM Report July 16, 2024

Peach:

Oriental Fruit Moth: A biofix point for OFM was set on 4/10 in both northern and southern counties.  All Treatments for the second generation have past. Third generation timings are updated below:

OFM 2nd Generation Timing
Insecticide Type
County/Region Degree Days by  7/16 base 45 Conventional

2100-2200

2450-2500

Intrepid/Rimon

2000-2100

2350-2450

Diamides/Virus

2025-2150

2375-2450

Gloucester – Southern 2338 1st –past

2nd – 7/19-7/21

1st –past

2nd – 7/16-7/19

1st –past

2nd – 7/17-7/19

Hunterdon – Northern 2121 1st – 7/16-7/19

2nd – 7/25-7/28

1st – past

2nd – 7/22-7/25

1st – past

2nd – 7/23-7/25

 

Tarnished Plant Bugs; and Other Catfacing Insects: Catfacing insects remain very active. Very little recent fruit feeding has been observed.

Thrips: Flower Thrips have been observed feeding in highly colored ripening fruit, especially in poorly managed ground covers that contain clover or other flowering weeds. Thrips damage appears as “silvering” and usually appears on fruit close to harvest. If populations are high damage can be extensive. Presence of thrips may be scouted for using a beating tray to detect the presence of adults and nymphs in the tree. Flowering weeeds and shrubs on orchard edges may also be scouted by shaking flowers onto a beating tray or a sheet of paper. Delegate or Entrust at the highest labeled rate are the usual recommended materials for thrips in stone fruit. Lannate may be effective in some orchards but has not worked well in recent years. These materials all have short PHI’s and may be applied close to harvest when damage typically appears. Damage is different than peach and appears as a dark streak in a similar pattern as silvering. See the NJ Commercial Tree Fruit Production Guide for more information.

Japanese Beetles: Japanese beetle activity has been noticeable in many orchards. Effective materials include many of the pyrethroids, Neonicitinoids and Sevin (Carbamate). Products containing imidacloprid are standard insecticides for Japanese beetle control and should have a 0 day PHI. See the NJ Commercial Tree Fruit Production Guide for more information.

Apples and Pears:

Diseases: Now that primary scab is nearing the end, or has ended, the focus turns toward summer diseases such as fruit rots (esp. Bitter rot), and sooty blotch and fly speck. Bitter rot control has been difficult at best in recent years even where management programs have been rigorous. Research has suggested Products such as Merivon, Luna Sensation, Inspire Super, and Aprovia may be effective, and longtime reliable broad spectrum fungicides such as omega, captan and ziram should provide control. Experience has suggested that the addition of phosphorous acid products such as Prophyt or Rampart to captan sprays may improve control. Observations are that these products improve control of other summer diseases such as sooty blotch and flyspeck, and may help suppress scab infections where present. Bitter rot symptoms have been appearing for several weeks in southern counties. Symptoms increased dramatically in sensitive varieties over the past week.

Codling Moth (CM): The first generation codling moth timings have ended. Trap captures Continue and increased in some southern county orchards this week. A biofix was set for CM on April 17th in both northern and southern counties. Second generation timings are updated below. Rimon is not recommended for this and later generations. Trap Captures in some southern county orchards remain above threshold. Growers should still use effective materials within label restrictions.

Codling Moth Degree Day Timing – Second Generation
Application and Insecticide Type
County Area Biofix Rimon:

75-100DD + 14-17 days later

 

Intrepid

1150 + 1450 DD

Diamides – Altacor, Voliam mixes: (150-200 DD)

Madex

1250 DD + every 7-9 days during brood hatch (later if first spray is an IGR)

Standard Insecticides –  Delegate, Avaunt, OP’s, carbamates, pyrethroids

1250 DD + 1550 DD

 

DD 1150 1450 1250 1250 1550
Southern April 22 N/A N/A past past past past past
Northern  May 1 N/A N/A past past past past 7/17

Wine Grape:

Diseases: Powdery mildew symptoms are now appearing on clusters in some southern vineyards.

Grape Berry Moth: Damage from second generation berry moth is higher than normal in some southern county vineyards. Growers should check their timing using the NEWA model for the next generation. The next timing for GBM using Intrepid or diamides should be sometime next week for southern counties. Other effective materials can be applied at at that timing or a few days later.

Phenology Table: Based on annual observations made in Gloucester County.

Pest Event or Growth Stage Approximate Date 2024 Observed Date
 Bud Swell (Redhaven/PF-17)  March 23 +/- 15 Days March 13
1/4″ Green Tip Red Delicious March 31 +/- 13 Days March 18
Pink Peach (Redhaven/PF-17) April 4 +/- 15 Days March 18
Tight Cluster Red Delicious April 9 +/- 13 Days March 30
Full Bloom Peach (Redhaven/PF-17) April 9 +/- 14 Days April 5
Pink Apple (Red Delicious) April 14 +/- 12 Days April 9
Full Bloom Apple (Red Delicious) April 22 +/- 11 Days April 20
Petal Fall (Redhaven) April 22 +/- 10 Days April 15
Petal Fall (Red Delicious) April 27 +/- 13 Days  May 3
Shuck Split (Redhaven) April 30 +/- 11 Days  April 22
Pit Hardening June 15 +/- 9 Days  June 10

 

 

Tree Fruit Trap Captures – Southern Counties

STLM TABM-A CM BMSB OFM-A DWB OFM-P TABM-P LPTB PTB
3/23/2024 70 0
3/30/2024 29 0 0
4/6/2024 421 0 0
4/13/2024 415 7 1
4/20/2024 900 7 0
4/27/2024 312 2 22  1
5/4/2024 137 2 8 27 1 5
5/11/2024 6 2 15 2 1 10 42
5/18/2024 5 6 11 2 6 0 12 41
5/25/2014 33 29 7 4 25 0 44 37
6/1/2024 719 12 12 1 1 0 44 57
6/8/2024 163 7 6 0 27 0 35 52 3
6/15/2024 252 4 0 0 0 31 0 4 54 4
6/22/2024 252 4 0 0 0 31 0 4 54 4
6/29/2024 500 1 1 2 0 31 0 10 35 4
7/6/2024 245 2 5 2 1 34 0 0 27 0
7/13/2024 5 1 2 1 0 34 0 1 34 1

Tree Fruit Trap Captures – Northern Counties

STLM TABM-A CM BMSB OFM-A DWB OFM-P TABM-P LPTB PTB AMBROSIA BEETLE
3/23/2024
3/30/2024
4/6/2024 0 0
4/13/2024 3.25 37.6
4/20/2024 11.75 93
4/27/2024 0 19 50
5/4/2024 1 16 19 124
5/11/2024 3 4 18 112
5/18/2024 4 2 1 2 2 2 83
5/25/2024 7 5 0 16 8 23 55
6/1/2024 16 7 0 28 7 21 37
6/8/2024 17 4 0 23 3 16 2 12
6/15/2024 21 2 0 21 21 27 1 12
6/22/2024 13 1 0 43 13 16 1 3
6/29/2024 15 1 0 49 13 17 1 0
7/06/2024 6 2 0 64 9 19 2 0

EPA Announces New, Earlier Protections for People from Pesticide Spray Drift

WASHINGTON – Today, July 15, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is putting protections in place sooner for farmworkers, their families, and the general public near where pesticides are applied. EPA will now assess the potential for people to be exposed to a pesticide when it drifts away from where it is applied earlier in the […]

EPA Announces Update on Atrazine (with editorial note on NJ)

[7/8/2024]. Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing an update to the level at which atrazine is expected to adversely affect aquatic plants. The new revised atrazine concentration of 9.7 micrograms per liter (µg/L), which was derived following an August 2023 peer review, will be used to develop a revised regulatory decision to […]

EPA Announces Update on Atrazine (with editorial note on NJDEP 2018 ag use data summary)

[7/8/2024]. Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing an update to the level at which atrazine is expected to adversely affect aquatic plants. The new revised atrazine concentration of 9.7 micrograms per liter (µg/L), which was derived following an August 2023 peer review, will be used to develop a revised regulatory decision to […]