Commercial Ag Updates + Farm Food Safety

Rutgers Cooperative Extension Ag Agents provide updates on what they see in the field, upcoming events, and other important news that affects your operation, such as developments in on-farm Food Safety. Subscribe if you wish to be notified about workshops, meetings, and upcoming commercial ag events.
 
Subscriptions are available via EMAIL and RSS.

Pre-Harvest Water Requirements Under the Produce Safety Rule

Note:  The following is a brief description of the pre-harvest water requirements (Section 112.3-112.161) under the Food Safety Modernization Act/Produce Safety Rule (FSMA/PSR).  The pre-harvest water requirements are complicated and this summary is intended to be a starting point while we wait for guidance from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  For those who have already taken the FSMA/PSR grower training we will host an update webinar in the fall.  For those who have not taken the FSMA/PSR grower training our course will be updated this year to reflect the latest information.

The pre-harvest water (irrigation, spray water, frost protection, fertigation, dust abatement, etc.) requirements for the FSMA/PSR became effective on July 5, 2024, however this does not mean a grower needed to start complying on that date.  Compliance dates are staggered over the next three years depending on the size of the operation.  Farms having an inspection in 2024 should expect Subpart E to be discussed by inspectors to prepare them for compliance in 2025 and beyond.:

Size of Operation Compliance Dates
Operations over $500,000 April 7, 2025
Small operations (> $250,000-500,000) April 6, 2026
Very Small operations (> $25,000-250,000) April 5, 2027

It is important to understand what is considered Agricultural Water. Water that is intended to or will likely touch produce is considered agricultural water. In the context of pre-harvest water that means any water you are using for irrigation, frost protection etc. that touches the crop. If you are using drip irrigation for staked tomatoes this is NOT agricultural water as the water is not touching the fruit. If you are using drip irrigation on carrots, this IS agricultural water, as the water is touching the crop.  A grower needs to think about how each water source is used before they decide whether it is agricultural water or not. If you have specific questions with regards to whether or not your water is agricultural water, please reach out to us.

Water testing is not a requirement for pre-harvest water but can be part of the agricultural water assessment of the whole water system.  This means an inspector will ask the grower to explain their system and how they minimize risks to the covered crops.

Requirements for Inspecting and Maintaining Agricultural Water Systems

As part of the rule, growers must inspect the whole water system (pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest) at the beginning of the season that is under the farms control.  This includes:

  • The water source (well and surface); the extent of the grower’s control and how each source is protected.
  • Use of adjacent and nearby land (e.g., horse or cattle farm next door; runoff from roads)
  • If surface water (e.g., stream, lake, or pond)- what is the chance a food safety hazard could enter the water before it got to your farm? (e.g., dairy farm upstream where cows get in the stream).

An inspection report must be written as to the findings of the inspection!

Requirements for Agricultural Water Assessment

 The rule requires that a pre-harvest water assessment must be completed at the beginning of the season, the assessment is different than an inspection!

  • The assessment only applies to the pre-harvest water.
  • Must be a written assessment dated and signed at the beginning of the season, annually or anytime major changes are made to the system or water source. The inspection report can be incorporated into the assessment.
  • Parts of the assessment
    • Location and nature of water source (e.g., ground water/wells, surface water/pond, stream, etc.)
    • How water is distributed (e.g., underground main, lay flat, canals, etc.)
    • How system is protected from contamination (animals, manure applications, etc.)
    • Agricultural water practices
  • How water is applied and time between last irrigation and harvest
  • Crop characteristics (e.g., waxy surface-cabbage, netted surface-muskmelons, etc.)
  • Environmental conditions (Damage from frost, hail, blowing sand, etc.)
  • Other factors
    • Water testing, but the assessment can not be based just on water testing. It is only part of the assessment.
  • If the operation meets any of the following, they can be exempt from performing a water assessment.
  • No untreated surface water applied.
  • Untreated groundwater is tested following the protocol for harvest and post-harvest water (four samples the first year for generic E. coli and one sample every year after if no generic E. coli is found).
  • Public water system water use.
  • Water is treated, monitored and to be of a safe and adequate sanitary quality.

Outcome from the assessment

  • If the water source is not safe or is not of adequate sanitary quality, you must stop use immediately and take corrective measures before use.
    • If the problem is related to biological soil amendments of animal or human origin on adjacent or nearby land, mitigation measures to stop and prevent the contamination must be implemented the same growing season (e.g., building a berm around the field to avoid runoff from a horse pasture).
    • Any other conditions not related to animal activity impacting the quality of the water must be remediated as soon as practical and no later than the following year. The other option is to test the water source as part of the assessment and implement changes if needed.

Corrective measures are activities that must be done before using the water source.  Such as re-inspecting the water system and making any changes or treating the water following FSMA/PSR standards.

Mitigation measures can take many forms including making a repair, increasing the time from the last irrigation to harvest, changing the water application method or source, etc.

Once we receive guidance from the FDA giving us greater details on how Subpart E impacts specific farm scenarios, we will share that information via the Plant and Pest Advisory.

Beat the Heat: Checklist to Identify Heat Hazards

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has created an Employer Checklist for Outdoor and Indoor Heat-Related Injury and Illness Prevention which may be utilized to identify sources of heat hazards in the workplace and respond effectively. Section 1 of the checklist is designed to help employers recognize job-related heat risks while Section 2 explores preparedness for heat-related injuries and illnesses. Additional OSHA resources on heat-illness prevention are included on the last page of the checklist.

OSHA Safe + Sound Header for Heat Illness Prevention

Beat the Heat: Heat Illness Prevention Plans

Water. Rest. Shade. flyer from OSHAThe University of Houston Clear Lake, using grant funds from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), created a model Heat-Illness Prevention Plan. While heat illness prevention plans are not required for New Jersey employers, review of this model plan may broaden an employer’s knowledge of heat illness prevention strategies. This model plan has five major sections which include employee training, monitoring weather conditions, heat hazard assessment, heat illness prevention strategies, and emergency response. Similar models are available online from states like California and Oregon which have adopted their own heat illness prevention rules.

 

Captan under registration review by EPA – comments on proposed mitigation measures due July 31, 2024

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently reviewing the registration of captan as mandated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to conduct a periodic review of existing pesticide registrations every 15 years. Captan is a broad-spectrum fungicide used in fruit and nut crops including almonds, apples, apricots, blueberries, cherries, grapes, nectarines, peaches, plums, prunes, and strawberries. A Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision (PID) was provided in 2022; however, the agency has issued an amended PID to identify risk mitigations and propose label changes that would address risks of concern for uses of captan. A summary of the EPA’s mitigation proposal is provided below. There is an open comment period for the public to provide responses to the proposed mitigation revisions and how they could impact production. The comment period ends on July 31, 2024. To view the amended proposed interim registration review in its entirety, see Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0296 at www.regulations.gov. For instruction on how to submit comments, visit https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0296-0335.

Summary of Mitigation for Specific Crops
I.                         Orchard Crops

·        Prohibit aerial application of DF/WDG and WP formulations;

·        Reduce maximum application rate for apples, peaches, and nectarines, from 4 to 3 lbs. ai/A;

·        Reduce maximum application rate for cherries from 3.16 to 3 lbs. a.i./A;

·        Require PF50 respirator, single layer protective clothing, 85 and chemical-resistant gloves for handlers mixing/loading DF/WDG and WP formulations for airblast application;

·        Require enclosed cabs and single layer protective clothing for airblast applicators;

·        Require enclosed cabs and single layer protective clothing for groundboom applicators treating orchard crops or PF10 respirator, chemical-resistant gloves, and single layer protective clothing; and

·        Limit application with mechanically pressurized handgun to spot treatment of areas missed with other application equipment, such as application to row ends.

NOTE: There are no proposed changes to the current REIs on captan product labels for orchard crops.

II.                      Berries & Grapes

·        Prohibit aerial application of DF/WDG and WP formulations but allow aerial application for liquid formulations.

·        Require PF50 respirator, chemical-resistant gloves, and single layer protective clothing for mixing and loading DF/WDG and WP formulations to be applied by airblast or groundboom.

·        For strawberries, EPA is proposing to require the PF50 respirator only for large growers whose operations are greater than 80 acres to protect mixers/loaders.

·        There are no changes to the REI for any berries; the REIs on current labels are sufficient.

·        Workers who are girdling and turning table grapes must observe a 5-day REI.

 

Note Changes in Harmonized Audits for 2024

It has come to our attention that growers are using on old self audit checklist for their 2024 audit.  According to USDA the old form was not acceptable after April 30, 2024!  The USDA released the new Harmonized GAP Standard and Harmonized Plus+ Standard Audits in March to give growers the opportunity to update their plans. There are several changes related to section numbers and deleted numbers so if you have your audit plan setup by section number check to make sure they have not changed. Also, eight questions have been added. Following is a summary of those questions:

  • G 2.4 – Approved service provider list required (the grower approves the list)
  • G 7.2 – A designated recall team is required
  • G 7.3 – Must perform a mock recall exercise annually
  • G 11.5 – Must have labels and instructions for any water treatment chemical used
  • G 11.8 – Compressed air or other gases contacting food or food contact surfaces must be maintained
  • F 6.3 – Must have a procedure for storing and handling growing media (e.g., perlite, peat, rock wool, etc.)
  • F 9.4 – Re-used water must be treated with a labeled product
  • P 5.2 – A master cleaning schedule with standard operating procedures (SOP) must be established

There are two documents for each audit: Harmonized GAP Standard (v 3.0) or Harmonized GAP Plus+ standard (v 5.0). Each audit has a corresponding checklist “Harmonized GAP Combined Checklist (v6.1)” This is the checklist a grower should be using to their self-audit. Remember an older version will not be accepted which means the audit fails.  Go to the Rutgers On-Farm Food Safety website an look under the USDA Audits tab or go to Harmonized GAP | Agricultural Marketing Service (usda.gov) to download the correct versions.

Beat the Heat: Training Resource

Employee training on working in the heat may reduce risk of heat illness by raising awareness of heat safety. OSHA has developed “A Guide for Employers to Carry Out Heat Safety Training for Workers” which provides step-by-step instructions on how to engage employees in participatory heat safety training on three topics: 1) health effects of heat, 2) how to respond to symptoms, and 3) preventing heat illness. The training can be delivered in one, 45-minute session or three, 15-minute sessions.

Front page of OSHA employee training guide on heat illness prevention

Article By: The Rutgers Farm Health and Safety Working Group: Kate Brown, Michelle Infante-Casella, Stephen Komar and William Bamka