April 21, 2021

Allium leaf miner update: 04/21/21

Allium Leaf Miner

Allium leaf miner (ALM) feeding/egg laying scars continue to increase in chive plantings near Milford, Hunterdon County and Lawrenceville, Mercer County as of this Tuesday.  Chives in home gardens in central Morris County and southern Cape May County were also found to be infested this past weekend, with adults actively flying in plants.  The first (spring) flight of these flies appears well underway.  Yellow sticky cards have captured low, but consistent (range 1-5/card/week) numbers of adults in Hunterdon and Mercer County plantings.  Foliar insecticide applications temporarily suppress catches on the cards.  Growers throughout the state should assume there is egg laying activity in their area currently.

Damaged plantGrowers should consider initiating (continuing) the control method of their choice at this time.  Affected crops include chives, scallions, garlic, onions and leeks.  Look for neat rows of white spots descending from the upper tips of allium leaves (see photo at left).  Initial injury often occurs on the tallest leaves.  Under warmer, less breezy conditions, adults may be seen near the tips of leaves (see photo of adults at lower right).  Click on photos to enlarge the images.

Floating row covers, kept on until this flight ends will help minimize access to plants.  Insecticide applications targeting adults may be helpful as well, although weekly sprays have not stopped foliar injury.  Spinosyn materials (Radiant, Entrust (OMRI approved)), pyrethroids (Mustang Maxx, Warrior), neonicotinoids (Scorpion, Venom), the diamide Exirel (section 2ee recommendation) and the insect growth regulator Trigard are labeled for  leaf miner control.Damaged plant

Adult activity and observations of feeding will be reported on in the IPM Update as they occur.  At this time, all growers should continue to respond to the first adult generation.  We will attempt to identify the end of the first flight so that growers know when the risk of infestation has abated.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Organic Production, Vegetable Crops Tagged With: , ,
April 6, 2021

Allium leaf miner update: 04/06/21

Allium Leaf Miner

Allium leaf miner (ALM) feeding/egg laying scars were detected in a large chive planting near Milford, Hunterdon County on Tuesday of this week.  Feeding was very low (<0.5% of chive clusters), but several adults were observed in the planting.  This indicates that the first (spring) flight of these flies has now begun and damage will increase.  No injury or adults were found in a similar inspection of a commercial chive planting near Lawrenceville (Mercer Co.) on the same day.  Yellow sticky cards were deployed in both locations and will be checked weekly.  We look to identify the peak of the flight in central and northern NJ, as well as the period when the adult population is in decline.  Growers in southern counties should assume there is egg laying activity in their area currently.

Photo: Sabrina Tirpak. Allium leafminer oviposition scars on onion

The Milford and Princeton NJ weather stations that are closest to these farms both surpassed 250 growing degree days (GDD) base 39˚F on Monday (4/5).  This GDD base is close to that (38.3˚ F) which our colleagues at Penn State recommend for predicting the first emergence of ALM adults.

Growers should consider initiating the control method of their choice at this time.  Affected crops include chives, scallions, garlic, onions and leeks.  Look for neat rows of white spots descending from the upper tips of allium leaves (see photo at left).  Initial injury often occurs on the tallest leaves.  Under warmer, less breezy conditions, adults may be seen near the tips of leaves (see photo of adult at lower right).

Floating row covers, kept on until this flight ends will help minimize access to plants.  Insecticide applications targeting adults may be helpful as well, although frequency of applications is uncertain.  Spinosyn materials (Radiant, Entrust (OMRI approved)), pyrethroids (Mustang Maxx, Warrior), neonicotinoids (Scorpion, Venom) and the insect growth regulator Trigard are labeled for miner control.

Adult activity and observations of feeding will be reported on in the IPM Update as they occur.  At this time, all growers should respond to the first adult generation.  We will attempt to identify the end of the first flight so that growers know when the risk of infestation has abated.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Organic Production, Vegetable Crops Tagged With: , ,
September 2, 2020

Reflex 2SL received a 24(c) SLN label for transplanted peppers and tomatoes

Regulation

A 24(c) Special Local Needs label has been recently approved for New Jersey for use of Reflex herbicide for Control of Weeds in Transplanted Tomatoes and Transplanted Peppers. The use of Reflex 2SL is legal ONLY if a waiver of liability has been completed on the Syngenta website (https://www.syngenta-us.com/labels/indemnified-label-login).

Reflex is a selective preemergence herbicide for broadleaf weed control with both soil and foliar activity, but it is only labeled for preemergence use in transplanted peppers and tomatoes. The active ingredient in Reflex is fomesafen, a PPO inhibitor and the only herbicide in this family labeled for peppers and tomatoes. Broadleaved weeds are the main targetted species of this herbicide, that also activity on nutsedge. Expect excellent control of pigweed, (including Palmer amaranth), common ragweed, nightshade, and  common purslane, acceptable control of common lambsquarters, morningglories and galinsoga, and suppression of field bindweed and nutsedge at the rate labeled for transplanted tomatoes and peppers. Use of a surfactant will improves postemergence control of susceptible annual broadleaf weeds. Note that annual grasses and some annual broadleaf weeds, including spurred anoda or horseweed, will NOT be controlled by Reflex 2SL.
[Read more…]

Filed Under: Vegetable Crops Tagged With: , ,
May 30, 2020

Specialty Crops Injury Caused by Dicamba Herbicide Drift

Figure 1. Non-tolerant soybean foliage when exposed to a sublethal rate of dicamba 2 weeks after treatment. Leaves are cupped with the bottom edges curved towards the top surface of the leaves.

By Maggie Wasacz1 and Thierry Besancon2

1 Rutgers Weed Science Graduate Student; 2 Rutgers Weed Science Extension Specialist for Specialty Crops

Glyphosate-tolerant soybeans were first commercialized in 1996 in the United States. By 2006, almost 9 out of every 10 soybean acres were planted with glyphosate-tolerant cultivars. However, reliance on glyphosate alone for soybean weed control stimulates the selection of weed biotypes naturally resistant to glyphosate. By 2019, there were 43 weed species known to be resistant to glyphosate, including species such as Palmer amaranth or waterhemp that can easily out-compete soybean and reduce yield by more than 50% if left uncontrolled.

What is Dicamba Herbicide?

One way to control glyphosate-resistant weeds is to treat them with herbicides other than glyphosate, such as dicamba. Dicamba is a synthetic auxin herbicide that has been used to control broadleaf weeds for over 50 years. Chemical and seed companies have recently developed new soybean varieties that are tolerant to dicamba and that started to be commercialized in 2016. With the development of genetically modified dicamba-tolerant soybeans, dicamba may be sprayed more frequently during the growing season. Additionally, dicamba is regularly applied in corn, for right-of-way applications, and in the early fall for perennial weeds control.

Dicamba can injure sensitive broadleaf plants through tank incorrectly rinsed after spraying dicamba, particle drift during the dicamba application, and vaporization after dicamba has been applied . Particle drift refers to the herbicide being carried off-target by the wind during the application. Wind speed, particle droplet size, nozzle type, carrier volume, application method, and application speed will affect the extent of particle drift. Vaporization, on the other hand, occurs when the herbicide evaporates from the target plant and these vapors travel off-target.  For more information on herbicide drift, please refer to the following PPA post 10-best-management-practices-to-avoid-herbicide-drift.

If some of the dicamba sprayed onto a soybean field moves off-target and lands on a nearby field planted with a sensitive crop, the results can be very harmful. This injury could potentially cause aesthetic damage as well as reduce yield reduction.  Potential for yield loss is influenced by amount of dicamba as well as when the injury occurs. Small volumes of dicamba products can cause leaf cupping and deformation, plant twisting, and in extreme cases, plant death of sensitive crops.

Screening Vegetables for Dicamba Sensitivity

Greenhouse studies conducted at Rutgers University in 2019-2020 screened economically important vegetable crops from the mid-Atlantic region for sensitivity to sublethal doses of dicamba. These micro-rates of dicamba simulated varying levels of drift conditions in the field. To put the rates into perspective, the highest dose in this study was equivalent to about one drop of product per quart of water. The goals of this study are to develop recommendations that can help growers design their planting strategies around dicamba-treated fields as well as to use this data to help refine recommendations to maximize protection of sensitive crops.

Crop-Specific Reactions to Simulated Dicamba Drift

The most sensitive crops in this study were the leguminous crops, including non-tolerant soybean, lima bean, and snap bean, as well as solanaceous crops, such as tomato, eggplant and pepper. These crops demonstrated severe injury.

Soybean injury is characterized by the underside edges of the leaves curling upward toward the top surface of the leaves (Figure 1). Lima bean and snap bean have similar injury symptoms, both exhibiting injury in several ways. Higher rates caused some leaves to not emerge at all, while lower rates caused leaf cupping injury that caused the top edges of the leaves to curve downward towards the ground. Other symptoms included a bubble-like texture on the top sides of the leaves, as well as leaf crinkling.

Figure 2. Eggplant 2 weeks after treatment. The undersides of affected leaves are curled upward toward the top surfaces of the leaves.

Figure 3. Bell pepper 2 weeks after treatment. The leaves are cupped with a bubble-like texture on the top surface.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4. Tomato 2 weeks after treatment. Leaflets are curled, reduced in size, and deformed.

For eggplant and bell pepper, injury was expressed as the undersides of the leaves curling upward toward the top surface (Figures 2 and 3). Additionally, leaf crinkling is seen in bell pepper foliage (Figure 3). Finally, tomato plants express dicamba injury with leaf twisting, cupping, stunting, and crinkling. At higher rates, these leaflets will be extremely stunted and deformed (Figure 4). Lower rates will show slight cupping, leaf crinkling and a change in leaf surface texture. Among the most tolerant crops from this study were basil, pumpkin, lettuce, and kale. These plants incurred the lowest amount of damage. The moderately sensitive crops included watermelon, cucumber, and summer squash. Watermelon foliage exhibits injury differently than many of the other crops tested in the study. Rather than leaf cupping, watermelon leaf texture appears shriveled and more deeply lobed with small bubbles on the top leaf surface (Figure 5).

 

 

Figure 5. Watermelon 2 weeks after treatment. Leaves are deeply lobed with a puckering, bubble-like texture.

Figure 6. Summer squash 2 weeks after treatment. Leaf edges are curved downward toward the ground.

Figure 7. Cucumber 2 weeks after treatment. Leaf is cupped and the bottom edges of the leaf are curved upward towards the top leaf surface.

 

Summer squash and cucumber, however, show leaf cupping when injured. In summer squash, the top edges of the leaf curve downward towards the ground (Figure 6).  The foliage of cucumber tends to curve the bottom edges upward toward the top surface of the leaf, although both directions of cupping were observed. (Figure 7).

On-Going Research at Rutgers

This summer, Rutgers researchers will select a few of these crops to take yield in a field-based dicamba drift study that tests different drift rates and application timings. Although this study gives some preliminary information, more detailed studies are necessary to confirm these findings. However, in the meantime, this greenhouse work gives us a brief snapshot of which species to be most concerned with when working near dicamba treated fields and provides help with field identification of these injury symptoms.

If you suspect that dicamba drift may have injured your crops, please contact you local county extension agent or Rutgers weed science specialist (Dr. Thierry Besançon) as soon as possible, and take detailed pictures of the observed damages.

 

 

Filed Under: Blueberry, Commercial Ag Updates, Fruit, Organic Production, Tree Fruit, Vegetable Crops, Wine Grape Tagged With: , , , , , ,
April 24, 2020

Chemical Alternative Options to Paraquat for Weed Control in Vegetable Crops

Spraying for pests in a field Paraquat is an herbicide labeled on various crops species for row middles applications. However, with new paraquat use restrictions in place, vegetable growers may be interested by other herbicide options available for controlling emerged weed seedlings. Paraquat controls numerous annual grasses and broadleaf weeds seedlings by inhibiting plant photosynthesis. Its acts quickly by contact when absorbed by plant foliage and has no soil activity due to complete soil adsorption. Because of poor translocation, it is essential to have complete foliar coverage to achieve good weed control. Hence, the need for a non-ionic surfactant and the importance of making sure that weeds are not taller than 6” when direct-spraying paraquat in row middles. Paraquat offers relatively good crop safety because it does not translocate and will control a wide range of annual weeds at the seedling stage, which makes it the herbicide of choice for postemergence row middles weed control in labeled crops.

However, paraquat high toxicity to humans either through ingestion, breathing, or simple dermal contact justifies its “Restricted Use Pesticide” classification and the implementation of new EPA regulations since November 2019 (https://plant-pest-advisory.rutgers.edu/gramoxone-paraquat-mandatory-training-required-before-use/)

Chemical alternatives to paraquat are available for vegetable growers but may not provide a similar level of weed control or can have more detrimental effects when contacting the crop because of their systemic activity. All the alternative options presented in this post are classified by WSSA Group Numbers which are based on herbicide site of actions within the plants. All recommendations provided here are strictly limited to shielded row middle applications. Consult label for approved surfactants, application restrictions, pre-harvest intervals, and crop rotation restrictions. The mention of trade names and rates is for educational purposes and does not imply endorsement by the author or the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station. Always defer to the product label for instructions on properly applying an herbicide.

 Labeled Crops for Postemergence Row Middles Herbicides

WSSA Group Product Name Asparagus Strawberry Cucumbers Pumkin, winter, and summer squash Cantaloupe Watermelon Eggplant Pepper Tomato
2 League – – – – YES YES – YES YES
Sandea 75 DF YES – YES YES YES YES – YES YES
Solida 25DF – – – – – – – – YES
4 Spur / Stinger 3A YES1 YES2 – – – – – – –
Weedar 64 YES YES – – – – – – –
5 Metribuzin 75DF – – – – – – – – YES
7 Lorox 50DF YES – – – – – – – –
14 Aim EC YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Reflex 2SL – – – YES3,4 – YES3 – – –
22 Reglone – – – – – – – – YES5
27 Callisto YES – – – – – – – –

1 Only Spur is labeled for use on asparagus

2 Only Stinger is labeled for use on strawberry

3 Special Local Need label approved for New Jersey and expiring on Dec. 21, 2022

4 Labeled only for straight neck yellow, crooked neck yellow, and zucchini summer squash types

5 Special Local Need label approved for New Jersey and expiring on Dec. 31, 2021

Group 2 – Inhibition of amino acids biosythesis

Sandea (halosulfuron), League (imazosulfuron), and Solida (rimsulfuron) have both preemergence and postemergence activity. These herbicides will control emerged seedlings of galinsoga, pigweeds, and ragweed, and suppress yellow nutsedge. League has shown good suppressive activity of common purslane. However, they are weak on common groundsel, common lambsquarters, eastern black nightshade. Sandea and League have little to no activity on grasses whereas Solida will have fair activity on crabgrass, barnyardgrass, and foxtail, but not on goosegrass or fall panicum. Thus, these herbicides should always be tank mixed with an herbicide partner for broadening their weed control spectrum. These herbicides have systemic activity and contact with the planted crop should always be avoided. Postemergence activity will be achieved if targeted weeds are no taller than 3” tall and if the appropriate surfactant is added to the spray solution.

Group 4 – Plant growth regulators

Spur/Stinger (clopyralid) is a soil residual and postemergence herbicide that received a 24(c) Special Local Need label for use on strawberry in New Jersey. Label allows spring and post-harvest applications to control composites (thistle, ragweed, dandelion, groundsel, galinsoga) and leguminous (clover, vetch, mugwort) weeds. It has very little to no activity on other broadleaf weed as well as on grasses. Stinger should not be tank-mixed with any other herbicide or with a surfactant. Weedar 64 (2,4-D) is strictly a postemergence herbicide only labeled for use on asparagus and strawberry. Weedar is active on many annual and perennial broadleaf weeds but is weak on galinsoga and has no activity on grasses. Because of the risk of physical or volatility drift associated with growth regulator herbicides, Stinger, Spur or Weedar should never be applied if sensitive crops (cucurbits, eggplant, pepper, tomato) are planted nearby or if conditions (wind, inversion temperature, topography) favor drift.

Group 5 and 7 – Photosynthesis inhibitors

Metribuzin (metribuzin) is a soil residual and postemergence herbicide labeled for use on tomato that will primarily control broadleaf weeds no taller than 1”. Metribuzin provides good control of young seedlings of most broadleaf weeds, except for morningglories and nightshades. Metribuzin can be applied postemergence as a directed spray at least 2 weeks after transplanting and when tomato plants have reached the 5-leaf stage. injury. Lorox (linuron) is labeled for use on asparagus as a postemergence spray before the cutting season or immediately after cutting. Lorox will provide similar control to metribuzin on weeds no taller than 4”. Both Metribuzin and Lorox are providing poor control of grasses and should therefore be tank mixed with a graminicide if grass seedlings have already emerged. Contact with the planted crop should always be avoided to reduce the risk of herbicide injury.

Group 14 – Cell membrane disrupters

Aim (carfentrazone) is strictly a postemergence herbicides that acts by contact on many annual broadleaf weeds no taller than 3-4”. It has no activity on grasses and only poor to fair efficacy on cocklebur, jimsonweed, and common purslane. Complete foliar coverage is essential to achieve good weed control and will require mixing COC, MSO or a non-ionic surfactant. Reflex (fomesafen) received a 24(c) Special Local Need label for use on pumphin, watermelon, winter and summer squash. Reflex has both soil residual and postemergence activity. It will provide fair to good control of various broadleaf weeds, including galinsoga, pigweeds, jimsonweed, nightshads, ragweed, carpetweed and shepherd’s purse, but is weak on grasses. Row middle applications should be made prior to emergence or transplanting for pumpkin and squashes, but are allowed post-transplant for watermelon. Applications should always be made with a shielded sprayer to avoid crop injury.

Group 22 – Cell membrane disrupters

Reglone (diquat) is a postemergence non selective herbicides that belongs to paraquat herbicidal family but has a lower toxicity. Reglone received a 24(c) Special Local Need label for shielded applications in tomato row middles. Spray coverage is essential for optimum effectiveness and can be achieved by mixing a non-ionic surfactant to the spray solution. Reglone is expected to have a similar weed control spectrum than paraquat but local data are needed to confirm its efficacy, especially on grasses.

Group 27 – Pigment inhibitors

Callisto (mesotrione) has both soil residual and postemergence activity and is labeled on asparagus for banded application prior to soear emergence or after harvest. Callisto applied postemergence will provide excellent control of annual broadleaf weeds such as galinsoga, lambsquarters, morningglories, pigweeds, nightshades, or velvetleaf. Callisto is not effective for controlling grasses and only provide limited control of common purslane and common ragweed. Callisto can also help suppressing yellow nutsedge. Applications for controlling targeted weed seedlings should always include COC or a non-ionic surfactant in addition to ammonium sulfate for improving Callisto burndown effectiveness. Weeds should not be taller than 5″ for optimal control.

 

In summary, there are other chemical options that can replace paraquat for control of emerged weeds in row middles in vegetables. However, most of them will have a more restricted spectrum of weed control than paraquat and will require the growers to properly identify the weed species before deciding which postemergence herbicide they want to use. Most of these herbicides have little to no control of grasses and will therefore require mixing a postemergence grass herbicide such as clethodim or sethoxydim for controlling emerged grass seedlings. Finally, timing of application with regard to weed growth stage is more critical with alternative options than with paraquat, since most of these herbicides require weeds no taller than 3 to 4″, or even 1″ for some herbicides, for achieving proper control.

 

Filed Under: Vegetable Crops Tagged With: , , , , ,
April 20, 2020

Safely Using Herbicides in Re-Used Plastic Mulch

Crops covered with plastic protection

Plastic mulch and trickle irrigation are expensive. Re-using the mulch for a second crop after the first can be an effective way to spread the cost.

Plastic mulch and trickle irrigation are expensive. Re-using the mulch for a second crop after the first can be an effective way to spread the cost. When the cost of supplies and labor are evaluated, re-using a field with trickle irrigation and black plastic mulch is an attractive idea, but weed control can be a problem.

The herbicides used under the plastic and between the rows of mulch for the first crop must be safe and labeled for use in the second crop. Prefar applied at 6 quarts per acre in a band when the mulch is laid is a good choice for under the plastic. Prefar is labeled for many vegetable crops but ALWAYS check the label to see if the crop you plan to plant is listed on it. Prefar and Gramoxone plus NIS (nonionic surfactant), applied as a shielded banded spray between the rows of mulch, are also labeled for a wide range of vegetable crops. Be sure post plant applications of Gramoxone plus NIS are shielded, applied at low pressure, and a low drift agent is used.

Often the greatest challenge is eliminating the first crop and any weeds in the field prior to planting the second crop in the mulch. No herbicide should be sprayed broadcast over the mulch except Gramoxone, which is quickly broken down by sunlight.

Roundup and other glyphosate products should NEVER be used on plastic mulch. Gyphosate has no residual activity due to strong and immediate adsorption by the soil where it is slowly broken down by soil microorganisms as a food source. On plastic mulch without contact with the soil, glyphosate does not easily wash off the plastic with rain or irrigation. The simple act of letting the root ball in contact with the plastic during transplanting can expose the crops roots to enough glyphosate to cause lasting injury and crop loss!

Residual herbicides must be banded between the rows of plastic mulch, NEVER sprayed broadcast over the mulch. Broadcasting residual herbicides over plastic mulch can increase the risk of washing the herbicide from the plastic into the planting hole when it rains or if you irrigate overhead. Herbicide concentration in the planting hole will be way higher than the safety threshold for any crop! If the herbicide from 1 square foot of plastic washes into the 3 square inch planting hole, that will increase increase 48 times the intended herbicide rate in the planting hole!!! You can certainly not expect good crop safety from any herbicide at 48 times the intended rate! Keep all residual herbicides off the plastic mulch.

In summary, the greatest weed control challenge in re-used plastic is weeds growing under and through holes in the mulch. Gramoxone is broken down by sunlight, so it can be used to kill the first crop and emerged weeds. Consider fumigating under the mulch with a water soluble fumigant injected through the trickle irrigation to provide weed control in the second crop. Disease control may be another added benefit. Remember to wait until the fumigant has dissipated before planting.

Filed Under: Vegetable Crops Tagged With: , , ,