Integrating Management for Key Orchard Pests

 

By: Robert McDougall and Anne L. Nielsen

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is the practice of using biological information to efficiently and effectively control pests while reducing reliance of pesticides. IPM is typically depicted as a pyramid of tactics that build on each other moving from least toxic at the bottom to most disruptive at the top. But in practice, IPM for insects in tree fruit relies primarily on application of synthetic insecticides guided by degree-day timing or trap counts. We want to flip the “IPM pyramid” around to emphasize that insecticides are the last tool for pest management and build upon other biologically-based practices.

Graphic describing management practices for orchard pests

By Anne Nielsen

The least disruptive means of pest control are cultural measures, those that seek to prevent pests from becoming problematic in the first place. These can include measures such as planting resistant cultivars, practicing good hygiene to prevent pest entry and maintaining diverse plantings in crop margins to encourage natural biological control agents (e.g. other insects that eat pests). In tree fruit, cultural control may include rootstock resistant to wooly apple aphid or removal and burning of pruned limbs and dying trees (for borer or scale management) which removes infested plant material and habitat for other pests.

For curative action, a central component of IPM programs depends on monitoring programs to identify pest species, occurrence and seasonality, and abundance. This is achieved primarily through direct sampling of plant tissue or baited traps. Regardless of the monitoring method, it must be conducted frequently, weekly at best. Monitoring can also establish biofix dates to start accumulating degree-days that when applied to models predict life stages of insects based on available heat units for development.

Upon identification of key pests within the orchard, the next action can take on a wide range of forms depending on the pest. This can include biological control measures, such as enhancing or introducing a natural enemy of the pest into the system in the hope of controlling it. Interactions between natural enemies and pests occur naturally within an orchard, but the strength of the interaction can be weakened through chemical insecticides and lead to outbreaks of pests, particularly aphids, mites, thrips, and scales. Implementation of reduced input or non-chemical methods can protect populations of natural enemies such as predators or parasitoids within the orchard and prevent a pest from becoming actionable. An example of a biological control program currently under investigation is controlling the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug with the Samurai Wasp, a tiny stingless Asian wasp which lays its eggs in BMSB eggs, preventing them from hatching and producing more Samurai Wasps instead of stink bugs.

The next IPM tool is behavioral management which changes the behavior of the insect so that less insecticide can be used. Insects, like other animals, have predicable behaviors, that once understood can be exploited for management. Two common approaches include altering insect behavior with pheromones (ie. mating disruption or attract-and-kill) or exploiting dispersal behaviors to apply targeted management (ie. border sprays). Mating disruption uses a species’ own sex pheromone to reduce mating within the orchard. This is accomplished by placing multiple dispensers containing pheromone throughout the orchard. This changes the behavior of male moths that are searching for females and results in fewer females laying eggs within the orchard (and cleaner fruit at harvest). For many insect species, including Oriental Fruit Moth and borers, no additional insecticide is needed (based on monitoring trap thresholds). Mating disruption for Oriental Fruit Moth in peaches can cost the same if not less than insecticide management and is highly effective. Mating disruption technology against borers is becoming increasingly necessary as further use restrictions change for Lorsban.

The behavioral tactic attract-and-kill places high doses of pheromone, usually an aggregation pheromone, on select trees to attract males and females (and sometimes nymphs) to a tree where they can then be killed with an insecticide. It is not believed to bring additional insects into the orchard, rather it brings those that are already there into one area. A second type of behavioral control is the use of border sprays. Many insects are often found in greater numbers in the edges of orchards because their dispersal is arrested due to visual cues provided by trees on the orchard edge. A border spray is usually defined as spraying the outer rows of orchard trees with insecticide. This tactic has shown to be very successful for controlling brown marmorated stink bug in peaches and apples, and reduces insecticide sprays by 25% relative to alternate row middle applications. Plum curculio also exhibits this behavior, and Rutgers is currently investigating whether it can be effectively controlled by spraying just the outer two rows of orchards during movement into the orchard.

IPM practices have evolved considerably in the past few decades and orchards are managed safer and more efficiently each year. Some of the IPM tactics described above may already be part of your orchard management practices. But as production cost increases are not instep with fruit prices, tactics that rely less on insecticide inputs will help protect orchard viability.

Spotted Lanternfly Updates

Spotted lanternfly (SLF) populations are very active in multiple NJ counties such as Hunterdon, where large numbers of adults can be seen feeding. As of last week, the majority of adults were observed feeding on tree of heaven. Where possible, tree of heaven should be treated with either an herbicide and/or an insecticide. PSU has information on treatment here https://extension.psu.edu/tree-of-heaven

Based on observations in Pennsylvania, feeding by adult Spotted Lanternfly in grapes can reduce overwintering survival and may have broader impacts to vine health. Spotted lanternfly is a phloem feeding insect that feeds directly on the cordon, not on the fruit. As they feed, they expel the extra sugars from their bodies in the form of honeydew. Honeydew can buildup underneath trees or on plant material beneath vines and can be colonized by sooty mold fungi. In grapes, sooty mold can develop on clusters, significantly reducing quality, although this has not yet been observed in the USA. More importantly in areas with high SLF populations, vine health has deteriorated quickly. In Pennsylvania both a decrease in winter hardiness and vine death has occurred.

Vines should be watched closely to determine if SLF adults are dispersing into the vineyards and feeding. Populations will likely be higher along vineyard edges. If feeding occurs, an insecticide treatment may be warranted. The adults have not started to lay eggs yet so this is a critical time for population management. Multiple insecticide materials are effective against the adult stages. Recommendations from PennState in grapes are:

Pennsylvania State University Insecticide Recommendations Against Spotted Lanternfly

 (*modified for space)

Trade Name Active Ingredient Class

(IRAC Group)

Rate per Acre PHI (days) REI (hours) Labeled for SLF on Grape in PA? Life Stage Tested Longevity SLF Activity
Brigade 10WSB bifenthrin Pyrethroid

(IRAC 3)

16 oz 30 12 Yes, 2(ee) Nymphs Adults **** ++++
Actara 25WDG * thiamethoxam Neonicitinoid (IRAC 4A) 3.5 oz 5 12 Yes, 2(ee) Nymphs Adults **** ++++
Scorpion 35SL * dinotefuran Neonicitinoid (IRAC 4A) 5 fl oz 1 12 Yes, 2(ee) Nymphs Adults *** ++++
Carbaryl 4L carbaryl Carbamate (IRAC 1A) 2 qt 7 12 No
Note: Sevin XLR has 2(ee)
Nymphs Adults *** ++++
Danitol 2.4EC fenpropathrin Pyrethroid

(IRAC 3)

21.33 fl oz 21 24 No Nymphs ** ++++
Malathion 8F malathion Organophosphate (IRAC 1B) 1.88 pts 3 12 Yes, 2(ee) Nymphs Adults ** ++++
Mustang Maxx 0.8EC zeta- cypermethrin Pyrethroid

(IRAC 3A)

4 fl oz 1 12 Yes, 2(ee) Nymphs Adults ** +++
Avaunt 30DG indoxacarb Oxadiazine (IRAC 22) 6 oz 7 12 Yes, 2(ee) Nymphs Adults * ++
Assail 30SG * acetamiprid Neonicitinoid (IRAC 4A) 5.2 oz 3 48 Yes, 2(ee) on nymphs only Nymphs Adults * +

Always follow the insecticide label for use and application instructions. Please note that there is variation in the residual activity of each material and some materials require a 2(ee) label for use in grapes. BotaniGard is also being evaluated as a biological insecticide by PSU.

New sightings of spotted lanternfly in NJ can be reported, along with a picture and address to slanternfly@njaes.rutgers.edu

Plum Curculio Phenology Model

Plum Curculio Biology and Management in New Jersey Peaches

 

Dr. Anne Nielsen, Tree Fruit Entomologist

Dr. Clement Akotsen-Mensah, Postdoctoral Research Associate

Plum curculio (PC)continues to be a major pest of peach, apple, plum, cherry and blueberry, and can cause significant crop losses through early season scarring of the fruit. Untreated peach blocks in NJ can have >90% injury through scarring, direct fruit loss, and larval contamination of the fruit. In recent years, we have observed that more applications are needed for control to bring PC populations to manageable levels, particularly in peaches. This is because of 1) extended period of PC activity, 2) less effective insecticides, or 3) presence of the Southern population which has at least 2 generations per year.

 

There is a lot of seasonal variations in major plant phenological events like time of bloom and petal fall within NJ, we can use degree-day accumulation and plant phenology to better predict activity and injury. We present results from series of research conducted in the laboratory and in research plots to help unravel the population structure and (unbaited) trap based degree-day model of PC in NJ peaches. Also, pest phenological events have been determined and a degree-day model developed which is being validated in peach orchards.

 

Table 1. Phenological events recorded in experimental peach orchard in 2017 and 2018 peach seasons in New Jersey

  Biofix at January 1 and LTDT at 10°C (50°F)
Phenological event 2017 2018 Mean
First trap catch 89 96 93
First peak trap catch 123 167 145
First egg lay in fruit 247 295 271
Peak egg laying 383 399 391
Peak larval emergence 547 515.5 531
Peak trap catch of second generation 1256 961 1108

 

Plum Curculio Management

Insecticide treatments continue to be the main management tool for plum curculio. Insecticides are applied to the whole block targeting critical phenological events such as petal fall, peak of oviposition, and emergence of the second generation. Insecticides used (Table 2) will target the adults migrating from overwintering or egg laying. The model predicts plum curculio will start migrating from overwintering sites into peach orchards at a degree-day of 88-100DD using January 1 as biofix and 10°C as lower development temperature threshold (Table 1). The peak trap capture of the overwintering population occurs within 113-176DD. The peak egg lay in peach occurs in a range of 379-402 DD.

Growers typically begin insecticide applications against plum curculio in peach at petal fall and repeat every 7 to 14 days as long as new damage appears or until 400DD in apple (post golden delicious petal fall).

Our model provides additional decision making using pyramid trap numbers and degree-day accumulations. We predict the first application (whole block) using a plum curculio adulticide (Imidan, Avaunt, Asana, Harvanta, or Apta) to occur before the peak trap capture at 113-176 DD. This application should be made as long as the phenology of the plant permits (after petal fall). A second application (using Actara, Belay, Rimon (apples)) should be made before the peak egg laying (379-402 DD) to kill eggs. Applications should continue on 7-14 day schedule if activity and pressure warrant management. If needed, application using Imidan, Avaunt, Asana, Harvanta or Apta at the peak of the second generation 900-1317 DD.

Table 2: List of insecticides that are used to control plum curculio on pome and stone fruit (Rutgers Cooperative Extension Commercial Tree Fruit Production Guide 2016)

Compounds Chemical class / activity Crop Life Stage targeted
Imidan 70W Organophosphate (phosmet) Pome fruit

Stone fruit

Adults
Lethal via contact  
Actara 25WG Neonicotinoid (thiamethoxam) Pome fruit

Stone fruit

Adults

Eggs

Lethal, Antifeedant and Curative  
Belay 2.13SC Neonicotinoid (clothianidin) Pome fruit

Peach

Adults

Eggs

Lethal, Antifeedant and Curative  
Avaunt 30WG Oxadiazine (indoxacarb) Pome fruit

Stone fruit

Adults
Lethal via ingestion    
Asana, Warrior, Baythroid Pyrethroids Pome fruit

Stone fruit

Adults
Lethal, repellent  
Rimon (targeting codling moth, obliquebanded leafroller) IGR (novaluron) Apple Eggs
Egg sterilization Stone fruit  
Harvanta Diamide Apple Adults

(maybe eggs)

 

The mention of a product does not mean endorsement of this product. Growers are required to strictly follow all labels.

Monitoring for SLF Egg Masses

Spotted lanternfly egg mass

Spotted lanternfly egg mass – photo by A.L. Nielsen

Spotted lanternfly is a new invasive species in NJ. Egg masses are brownish grey and generally laid on bark in early fall and appear like a smudge of mud. Adults are expected to start egg laying in August and continue through November or the first hard frost.

SLF eggs overwinter and can be laid on multiple hard surfaces, including fence posts, trees, patio furniture, fruit bins, landscaping stones, railway cars, etc. Due to this they can be easily transported and represent a significant risk to SLF populations spreading. Vehicles, stones, agricultural equipment, and fruit bins coming from PA or VA should be inspected for egg masses beginning in August. Within state movement is also of concern to prevent new populations. If found, egg masses can be scraped into a plastic bag and frozen to limit spread and future impact of this pest.

Spotted Lanternfly in NJ

NEW PEST ALERT

Spotted lanternfly in grape

Spotted lanternfly in grape – photo credit E. Smyers

Spotted lanternfly (Lycorma deliculata, SLF) has been found in NJ. SLF is an invasive plant hopper species that could be very devastating to some NJ crops. Since its discovery in Pennsylvania in 2014, SLF has been placed under a state quarantine encompassing 13 Pennsylvania counties. Populations are also present in Virginia.

SLF adults and nymphs are phloem feeders that feed in large aggregations on woody tissue. Over 65 host plants were reported in Asia, many of which grow in the mid-Atlantic area. These host plants include hardwood trees such as Tree of Heaven, black walnut, and red maple and agricultural crops such as grape, apple, and hops. Feeding occurs on the trunk and limbs of plants, not on the fruit or leaf tissues. However, because they feed in aggregations and produce large amounts of honey dew (or sugar water), sooty mold can grow on plant surface and fruit, leading to reduced photosynthesis and plant vigor. In Pennsylvania, adults and nymphs have been observed feeding in commercial vineyards on cultivated grape. Economic estimates of injury are not available but growers report direct yield losses due to sooty mold and reductions in plant health and canopy coverage. Insecticides are effective but due to the high mobility of this pest, in highly infested areas, vines should be monitored closely for new bugs. Populations and injury are higher along vineyard edges, especially near Tree of Heaven. Interestingly, SLF tends to aggregate on a few trees or vines. Survey for SLF along the perimeters of fields and on Tree of Heaven, Black Walnut, Red Maple, and wild grapevines at the edges of wood lines. Aggregations of adults were found on commercial apple trees in PA near apples harvest in 2017, so apple growers need to be diligent as well.

The adults are large (~1” long) and quite colorful with a black head, grayish black spotted forewings and reddish black spotted hind wings. Adults may start to appear mid-late July (now) and will feed through the first hard freeze in the fall. Young nymphs hatch from eggs in late Spring/early summer and are black with white spots and as they get older they become red and black with white spots. While 4th instars have been reported in NJ, adults are present in VA, so be on the lookout for all life stages.

Spotted lanternfly on tree

Spotted lanternfly on Tree of Heaven – photo by A.L. Nielsen

If you think you seen or collected a spotted lanternfly please report it the New Jersey Department of Agriculture and the Department of Entomology at the Rutgers University School of Environmental and Biological Sciences by emailing slanternfly@njaes.rutgers.edu

BMSB is Under Attack!

Samurai wasp (Photo by Elijah Talamas)

Many of our fruit and vegetable growers throughout the state have been battling with populations of brown marmorated stink bug. This invasive pest feeds on most fruiting vegetables, small fruits, and tree fruits and can cause significant economic losses. One of the reasons that BMSB is such a bad pest is that when it arrived in the US, it did so without its co-evolved natural enemies. Until now! The Samurai wasp (Trissolcus japonicus) arrived in the US independently and the first populations were found in NJ in 2016 by the Department of Agriculture. However, no populations had been found in agricultural crops, which made us uncertain about its impact.

Last week, a parasitized egg mass was tentatively identified as the Samurai wasp. The Samurai wasp attacks stink bug eggs and has a special appetite for BMSB eggs. A female wasp will lay its eggs into the stink bug eggs. It is an effective parasite of BMSB and can parasitize on average 50% of each egg mass. Our finding was in a commercial peach orchard in southern New Jersey and may be the first finding in a US agricultural crop. We had placed egg masses in the orchard to measure natural enemy impacts of our border spray approach. We do not know the impact the Samurai wasp will have in NJ agriculture but this is a very promising new development in the fight against BMSB. Reduced spray methods, such as border sprays, may help to protect Samurai wasp populations in crops.

Samurai wasp emerging from BMSB egg mass

 

 

Drs. Joe Kaser and Clement Akotsen-Mensah contributed to this article.