Kudos to fellow Rutgers Professor/County Agent William Hlubik, and congratulations to his team for getting a spotlight on our aging American farmers! The need for new farmers, and the great Rutgers Cooperative Extension and other programs out there that assist those beginner farmers, was the topic of a special segment of CBS Evening News ‘Eye on America’ last week. It’s been exciting to watch the enthusiastic students graduating from Bill’s RU Ready to Farm program with the knowledge and resources to make farming a successful career choice. Thanks to CBS Evening News for covering this important topic! You can watch the clip here:
Commercial Ag Updates + Farm Food Safety
Rutgers Cooperative Extension Ag Agents provide updates on what they see in the field, upcoming events, and other important news that affects your operation, such as developments in on-farm Food Safety. Subscribe if you wish to be notified about workshops, meetings, and upcoming commercial ag events.
Subscriptions are available via EMAIL and RSS.
Rutgers Cooperative Extension Beginner Farmer Training Program In National News Spotlight
Beat the Heat: NWS Forecast Tools – Expanded
The National Weather Service compiled a list of resources on “Weather Information for Agriculture”. Direct links to long range outlooks (6-10 day and 8-14 day periods) for temperature are one inclusion which may be relevant for on-farm planning related to heat stress prevention.
Farmers may utilize other tools referenced in this resource to:
- Evaluate recent precipitation and conduct monthly or seasonal reviews of precipitation
- Monitor current drought conditions
- View 1-7 day forecasts for severe weather, excessive rain, air quality, and other weather-related hazards
- Explore long-range outlooks (up to 3 months out) for temperature, precipitation, and drought
Article By: The Rutgers Farm Health and Safety Working Group: Kate Brown, Michelle Infante-Casella, Stephen Komar and William Bamka
Pre-Harvest Water Requirements Under the Produce Safety Rule
Note: The following is a brief description of the pre-harvest water requirements (Section 112.3-112.161) under the Food Safety Modernization Act/Produce Safety Rule (FSMA/PSR). The pre-harvest water requirements are complicated and this summary is intended to be a starting point while we wait for guidance from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For those who have already taken the FSMA/PSR grower training we will host an update webinar in the fall. For those who have not taken the FSMA/PSR grower training our course will be updated this year to reflect the latest information.
The pre-harvest water (irrigation, spray water, frost protection, fertigation, dust abatement, etc.) requirements for the FSMA/PSR became effective on July 5, 2024, however this does not mean a grower needed to start complying on that date. Compliance dates are staggered over the next three years depending on the size of the operation. Farms having an inspection in 2024 should expect Subpart E to be discussed by inspectors to prepare them for compliance in 2025 and beyond.:
Size of Operation | Compliance Dates |
Operations over $500,000 | April 7, 2025 |
Small operations (> $250,000-500,000) | April 6, 2026 |
Very Small operations (> $25,000-250,000) | April 5, 2027 |
It is important to understand what is considered Agricultural Water. Water that is intended to or will likely touch produce is considered agricultural water. In the context of pre-harvest water that means any water you are using for irrigation, frost protection etc. that touches the crop. If you are using drip irrigation for staked tomatoes this is NOT agricultural water as the water is not touching the fruit. If you are using drip irrigation on carrots, this IS agricultural water, as the water is touching the crop. A grower needs to think about how each water source is used before they decide whether it is agricultural water or not. If you have specific questions with regards to whether or not your water is agricultural water, please reach out to us.
Water testing is not a requirement for pre-harvest water but can be part of the agricultural water assessment of the whole water system. This means an inspector will ask the grower to explain their system and how they minimize risks to the covered crops.
Requirements for Inspecting and Maintaining Agricultural Water Systems
As part of the rule, growers must inspect the whole water system (pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest) at the beginning of the season that is under the farms control. This includes:
- The water source (well and surface); the extent of the grower’s control and how each source is protected.
- Use of adjacent and nearby land (e.g., horse or cattle farm next door; runoff from roads)
- If surface water (e.g., stream, lake, or pond)- what is the chance a food safety hazard could enter the water before it got to your farm? (e.g., dairy farm upstream where cows get in the stream).
An inspection report must be written as to the findings of the inspection!
Requirements for Agricultural Water Assessment
The rule requires that a pre-harvest water assessment must be completed at the beginning of the season, the assessment is different than an inspection!
- The assessment only applies to the pre-harvest water.
- Must be a written assessment dated and signed at the beginning of the season, annually or anytime major changes are made to the system or water source. The inspection report can be incorporated into the assessment.
- Parts of the assessment
- Location and nature of water source (e.g., ground water/wells, surface water/pond, stream, etc.)
- How water is distributed (e.g., underground main, lay flat, canals, etc.)
- How system is protected from contamination (animals, manure applications, etc.)
- Agricultural water practices
- How water is applied and time between last irrigation and harvest
- Crop characteristics (e.g., waxy surface-cabbage, netted surface-muskmelons, etc.)
- Environmental conditions (Damage from frost, hail, blowing sand, etc.)
- Other factors
- Water testing, but the assessment can not be based just on water testing. It is only part of the assessment.
- If the operation meets any of the following, they can be exempt from performing a water assessment.
- No untreated surface water applied.
- Untreated groundwater is tested following the protocol for harvest and post-harvest water (four samples the first year for generic E. coli and one sample every year after if no generic E. coli is found).
- Public water system water use.
- Water is treated, monitored and to be of a safe and adequate sanitary quality.
Outcome from the assessment
- If the water source is not safe or is not of adequate sanitary quality, you must stop use immediately and take corrective measures before use.
- If the problem is related to biological soil amendments of animal or human origin on adjacent or nearby land, mitigation measures to stop and prevent the contamination must be implemented the same growing season (e.g., building a berm around the field to avoid runoff from a horse pasture).
- Any other conditions not related to animal activity impacting the quality of the water must be remediated as soon as practical and no later than the following year. The other option is to test the water source as part of the assessment and implement changes if needed.
Corrective measures are activities that must be done before using the water source. Such as re-inspecting the water system and making any changes or treating the water following FSMA/PSR standards.
Mitigation measures can take many forms including making a repair, increasing the time from the last irrigation to harvest, changing the water application method or source, etc.
Once we receive guidance from the FDA giving us greater details on how Subpart E impacts specific farm scenarios, we will share that information via the Plant and Pest Advisory.
Beat the Heat: Checklist to Identify Heat Hazards
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has created an Employer Checklist for Outdoor and Indoor Heat-Related Injury and Illness Prevention which may be utilized to identify sources of heat hazards in the workplace and respond effectively. Section 1 of the checklist is designed to help employers recognize job-related heat risks while Section 2 explores preparedness for heat-related injuries and illnesses. Additional OSHA resources on heat-illness prevention are included on the last page of the checklist.
Beat the Heat: Heat Illness Prevention Plans
The University of Houston Clear Lake, using grant funds from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), created a model Heat-Illness Prevention Plan. While heat illness prevention plans are not required for New Jersey employers, review of this model plan may broaden an employer’s knowledge of heat illness prevention strategies. This model plan has five major sections which include employee training, monitoring weather conditions, heat hazard assessment, heat illness prevention strategies, and emergency response. Similar models are available online from states like California and Oregon which have adopted their own heat illness prevention rules.
Captan under registration review by EPA – comments on proposed mitigation measures due July 31, 2024
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently reviewing the registration of captan as mandated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to conduct a periodic review of existing pesticide registrations every 15 years. Captan is a broad-spectrum fungicide used in fruit and nut crops including almonds, apples, apricots, blueberries, cherries, grapes, nectarines, peaches, plums, prunes, and strawberries. A Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision (PID) was provided in 2022; however, the agency has issued an amended PID to identify risk mitigations and propose label changes that would address risks of concern for uses of captan. A summary of the EPA’s mitigation proposal is provided below. There is an open comment period for the public to provide responses to the proposed mitigation revisions and how they could impact production. The comment period ends on July 31, 2024. To view the amended proposed interim registration review in its entirety, see Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0296 at www.regulations.gov. For instruction on how to submit comments, visit https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0296-0335.
Summary of Mitigation for Specific Crops |
I. Orchard Crops
· Prohibit aerial application of DF/WDG and WP formulations; · Reduce maximum application rate for apples, peaches, and nectarines, from 4 to 3 lbs. ai/A; · Reduce maximum application rate for cherries from 3.16 to 3 lbs. a.i./A; · Require PF50 respirator, single layer protective clothing, 85 and chemical-resistant gloves for handlers mixing/loading DF/WDG and WP formulations for airblast application; · Require enclosed cabs and single layer protective clothing for airblast applicators; · Require enclosed cabs and single layer protective clothing for groundboom applicators treating orchard crops or PF10 respirator, chemical-resistant gloves, and single layer protective clothing; and · Limit application with mechanically pressurized handgun to spot treatment of areas missed with other application equipment, such as application to row ends. NOTE: There are no proposed changes to the current REIs on captan product labels for orchard crops. |
II. Berries & Grapes
· Prohibit aerial application of DF/WDG and WP formulations but allow aerial application for liquid formulations. · Require PF50 respirator, chemical-resistant gloves, and single layer protective clothing for mixing and loading DF/WDG and WP formulations to be applied by airblast or groundboom. · For strawberries, EPA is proposing to require the PF50 respirator only for large growers whose operations are greater than 80 acres to protect mixers/loaders. · There are no changes to the REI for any berries; the REIs on current labels are sufficient. · Workers who are girdling and turning table grapes must observe a 5-day REI. |