Andy Wyenandt

This is an archive of Dr. Wyenandt's posts on the Plant and Pest Advisory.

The A-B-C’s of cucurbit downy mildew control

In 2004, cucurbit downy mildew (CDM) re-emerged in the US with a vengeance causing significant losses in cucurbit production. In most years prior to this, concern for CDM control was minimal, since the pathogen arrived late in the growing season (in more northern regions), or the pathogen caused little damage, or never appeared. After 2004, with significant losses at stake, and with very few fungicides labeled for its proper control, CDM became a serious threat to cucurbit production. Importantly, at the time, cucumber varieties with very good levels of CDM resistance were no longer resistant, suggesting a major shift in the pathogen population. Research done over the past 15 years has led to a better understanding of the pathogen. Recent research has determined that the CDM falls into two separate clades: Clade I and Clade II. Some CDM (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) isolates fall into Clade I which predominately infect watermelon, pumpkin, and squash, where CDM isolates in Clade II predominately infect cucumber and cantaloupe. Research suggests that isolates in Clade II can quickly become resistant to specific fungicides (NCSU). Most cucumber varieties are resistant to Clade 1 isolates, but there is no resistance currently available for Clade 2 isolates. For pickling cucumber the varieties, Citadel and Peacemaker, are tolerant to clade 2 isolates. For slicing cucumbers, the varieties SV3462CS and SV4142CL are tolerant to Clade 2 isolates. All organic and greenhouse growers are encouraged to use tolerant varieties since chemical control options are very limited (NCSU). An extended list of cucumber varieties with CDM resistance from the University of Florida can be found here. For the past decade, researchers from around the US have been closely monitoring and forecasting the progress of CDM through a website hosted by NCSU. The CDMpipe website is currently in the process of an upgrade and will now be hosted by Penn State University. All cucurbit growers are encouraged to sign up to the CDMpipe website to help them know what cucurbit crops are being infected (and where) and to follow the forecasting to know where the pathogen may move to next. As a note, in recent years, CDM control with certain fungicides has varied significantly depending on the cucurbit host and geographic region. This is extremely important since two clades of the pathogen are potentially present (affecting host range) as well as having a potential impact on control strategies. How do you know which clade may be present on your farm? Follow the reports. If CDM is mostly present in cucumber crops as it works its way up the east coast, then you are most likely to see it infect cucumber and melon on your farm first. Scout your fields regularly, especially if CDM is in the immediate region. Pay very close attention to symptom development and on what cucurbit crop(s) you see it on, this is especially important if you grow more than one cucurbit crop. Like cucurbit powdery mildew, once CDM arrives in the region preventative fungicide applications will be necessary.

Fungicides for CDM control

As with cucurbit powdery mildew control, there is no reason to begin a preventative CDM fungicide program until it has been detected in the immediate region. Cucurbit growers need to pay special attention to the reporting system mentioned above to see what cucurbit crops are affected by CDM and follow the forecasting system to see if CDM is an immediate threat.

Loss of efficacy in the control of CDM has also been documented in FRAC code 4 (mefenoxam), FRAC code 11 fungicides (azoxystrobin), FRAC code 28 (propamocarb HCL), and FRAC code 43 (fluopicolide) in the mid-Atlantic region and elsewhere. Insensitivity to fluopicolide (43) and propamocarb HCL (28) have been reported in multiple states (Thomas et al., 2018). In some cases, individual isolates of CDM were insensitive to both chemistries. Recent research in Michigan in a three year field study using pickling cucumber determined that cyazofamid (21), (ametoctradin, 45 + dimethomorph, 40), (zoxamide, 22 + mancozeb, M03), mancozeb (M03); chlorothalonil (M05), and oxathiapiprolin (49) alone or in a premix provided the best level of control (Goldenhar & Hausbeck, 2019). In a recent study evaluating different fungicide chemistries in field trials done in different states (OH, NY, & SC) determined that propamocarb HCL (28), cymoxanil + famoxadone (27 + 11), and fluopicolide (43) were ineffective in 1 or 2 states during both years of the trial (Keinath, Miller, & Smart, 2019). In one year of the study, famoxadone (11), dimethomorph (40), cymoxanil (21), and mancozeb (M03) were ineffective for CDM control (Keinath, Miller, & Smart, 2019). In bioassay studies done during this trial, cyazofamid (21), oxathiapiprolin (49) suppressed CDM >80%.

Most fungicides labeled for the control of CDM are at-risk for resistance development because of the specific modes of action. These include Ranman (cyazofamid, FRAC code 21), Gavel (zoxamide, 22 + mancozeb, M03), Zing! (zoxamide, 22 + chlorothalonil, M05); Curzate (cymoxanil, 27), Previcur Flex (propamocarb HCL, 28), Forum/Revus (dimethomorph, 40), Zampro (ametoctradin, 45 + dimethomorph, 40), Orondis Opti (oxathiapiprolin, 49 + chlorothalonil, M05), and Orondis Ultra (oxathiapiprolin, 49 + mandipropamid, 40). Importantly, just like with cucurbit powdery mildew control, there are a number of CDM fungicides with different modes of action from different FRAC codes to chose from. As noted in the paragraph above, the efficacy of individual fungicide chemistries may vary significantly by state or region. Thus, growers need to scout their cucurbit fields on a weekly basis, note the efficacy, or lack thereof, they are seeing in the field, and incorporate the use of as many different FRAC groups as possible to help mitigate fungicide resistance development.

Fungicide programs for CDM control

An example of a fungicide program for CDM control in the mid-Atlantic region might look like this, where a CDM specific fungicide from a different FRAC group is used on weekly basis:

A – B – C – D – E

where A= Gavel (zoxamide, 22 + mancozeb, M03); B= Orondis Opti (oxathiapiprolin, 49 + chlorothalonil, M05); C= Ranman (cyazofamid, FRAC code 21); D= Orondis Ultra (oxathiapiprolin, 49 + mandipropamid, 40); E= Curzate (cymoxanil, 27)

Not all of the fungicides listed above are labeled for all cucurbit crops. Some fungicides, such as the Orondis products have  limited number of applications. Growers will need to refer to local recommendations and the label for crop specifics. Remember, the label is the law.

A protectant fungicide such as chlorothalonil or mancozeb should be added (if not already included) to the tank mix with each high-risk fungicide to reduce selection pressure and to help control other important diseases such as anthracnose and plectosporium blight. All growers should follow use recommendations on labels and avoid overusing one mode of action, even if it works well. If loss of efficacy is present, the grower should avoid using that particular fungicide (FRAC group) for CDM control the rest of the growing season.

Growers should remember that fungicides specifically labeled for CDM control won’t control CPM, and fungicides labeled for CPM control won’t control CDM. Therefore, carefully following the disease monitoring and forecasting website, choosing varieties with CDM resistance, paying close attention to host crops, scouting fields on a regular basis, noting fungicide efficacy, and following proper fungicide resistant management guidelines remain critically important for successful CDM control.

For more information on the specific fungicides recommended for CDM control on cucurbit crops please see the 2020/2021 Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations.

The A-B-C’s of cucurbit powdery mildew control

Cucurbit powdery mildew (CPM), caused by Podosphaera xanthii, is one the most important diseases of cucurbit crops throughout the world. The pathogen is an obligate parasite, just like cucurbit downy mildew, meaning it needs a living host in order to survive. In northern regions that have a killing frost in the fall the pathogen will die out when the crop freezes. Not being able to overwinter, the pathogen must be re-introduced each spring or summer in the mid-Atlantic region. The pathogen accomplishes this by re-infecting cucurbit crops in the spring as they are planted up the east coast starting in Florida, then the Carolina’s, Virginia, and so forth. By late May, as soon as cucurbit crops begin to germinate in the mid-Atlantic region, the potential threat for potential powdery mildew infections begin.

The first step in mitigating CPM begins with planting powdery mildew tolerant (PMT) or resistant (PMR) cultivars if they meet your needs. It is important to remember that these cultivars are not “immune” to CPM; they will become infected at some point in the growing season depending on disease pressure. Hopefully, this will occur later in the season when compared to CPM susceptible cultivars. Organic growers hoping to mitigate losses to powdery mildew should always chose CPM tolerant or resistant cucurbit cultivars first. There are a number of OMRI-approved fungicides labeled to help suppress CPM development, these should always be used in concert with CPM tolerant or resistant cultivars and a preventative fungicide program. Cultural practices such as increasing in-row plant spacing to improve air flow and cultivation to keep weeds to a minimum will also be advantageous. Avoiding the use of overhead irrigation will help reduce disease pressure from another important pathogen, cucurbit downy mildew. Thus, growing cucurbits on a mulch with drip irrigation has its advantages, but also increases costs.

In the past, a typical conventional fungicide program consisted of rotating two different FRAC group fungicides every other week, such that the pattern looked like:

A – B – A – B – A – B

Often a protectant fungicide such as chlorothalonil or mancozeb is added to the tank mix on a weekly basis to 1) help control other important fungal diseases, such as anthracnose or gummy stem blight and 2) to help reduce selection pressure on the high-risk fungicide that was being applied. This type of preventative program was used for many years, because, in most cases there were just a few effective fungicides available for CPM control depending on the crop. An example of this would be:

A = (azoxystrobin [FRAC group 11] + chlorothalonil (MO5) rotated weekly with B = (myclobutanil [FRAC group 3] + chlorothalonil (MO5)

This type of control strategy worked extremely well as long as the pathogen didn’t develop resistance to either the FRAC group 11 (azoxystrobin) or FRAC group 3 (myclobutanil) fungicide. To better understand modes of action and how fungicide resistance develops in FRAC group 11 and FRAC group 3 fungicides please click here. Unfortunately, because of fungicide resistance development this type of program is no longer effective and is no longer recommended for CPM control.

Over the past 10 years, there have been a number of new fungicides released with new modes of action (i.e., new FRAC groups) for CPM control in cucurbit crops. Unfortunately, all have a moderate to high-risk for resistance development because of their specific modes of action. The good news are these new fungicide chemistries have less effects on humans, non-target organisms, and the environment.

These fungicides include:

  • FRAC group 13 (quinoxyfen)
  • FRAC group 39 (fenazaquin)
  • FRAC group 50 (metrafenone)
  • FRAC group U06 (cyflufenamid)
  • FRAC group U013 (flutianil)

Not all of the fungicides listed above are labeled for all cucurbit crops. Growers will need to refer to local recommendations and the label for crop specifics. Remember, the label is the law.

These fungicides offer new strategies when it comes to controlling and mitigating losses to CPM. Instead of rotating two fungicides with a moderate to high-risk for resistance development every other week ( A – B – A – B), growers now have option to reduce the total number of times any single fungicide might be applied during the production season; further reducing the risk for resistance development to any one mode of action. For example, in pumpkin, a new CPM preventative fungicide program may look like this:

A – B – C – D – E – A – B – C – D – E

Where A=(FRAC group 3);B=(FRAC group 13); C=(FRAC group 50); D=(FRAC group U013); E=(FRAC group 11)

A protectant fungicide such as chlorothalonil or mancozeb should be added to the tank mix with each high-risk fungicide to reduce selection pressure and to help control other important diseases such as anthracnose and plectosporium blight.

In this type of CPM preventative program any one high-risk fungicide would only be applied twice per growing season and 5 weeks apart greatly reducing the risk for fungicide resistance development. Importantly, for cucurbit growers, the easiest method to mitigate the potential for fungicide resistance development are to reduce the total number of applications of any one high-risk fungicide during the production season.

When to start spraying for CPM

Initiating a preventative spray programs begins with paying attention to Extension reports, scouting, and when the crop was seeded. If the crop is seeded the early-spring (i.e., early to late May) there is a very good chance CPM is not present in the mid-Atlantic region. If CPM is not present, there is no need to initiate a spray program using high-risk fungicides. In this instance, general protectant fungicides such as chlorothalonil will help mitigate other foliar diseases. As cucurbit crops are seeded into early to mid-June (and afterward) the risk for CPM development will rise in the mid-Atlantic region. This is when scouting and paying close attention to Extension reports becomes important. The first application should be done when CPM has been detected in the immediate region or when it is detected by scouting (e.g., with one lesion found on the underside of 45 mature leaves per acre). This will help reduce the use of unwarranted high-risk fungicide applications early in the production season. Importantly, the use of PMR or PMT cucurbit varieties will also help delay the onset of CPM development as well. Once CPM preventative fungicide programs are initiated, applications need to occur at every 7 to 10 days (at the latest) for as long as you expect to harvest (e.g., summer squash) or hold the crop (e.g., pumpkin and winter squash). During harvest, growers need to pay careful attention to pre-harvest intervals because they may vary significantly between different FRAC groups or fungicides within the same FRAC group (a good example are fungicides in FRAC group 3). Once harvest is complete, those blocks or fields need to be destroyed immediately to help reduce the spread of CPM to other blocks or fields that are scheduled to be harvested later in the production season. This is especially important for other diseases such as cucurbit downy mildew.

In some instances, rotating between many different FRAC group fungicides are not an option because the chemistries aren’t available for use. An example would be leaf spot control in spinach, where FRAC groups (7, 11, 7 + 11, 7 + 12, and 9 + 12) are available. In this example, options for control might look like this:

A – B – C – D

Where A=(FRAC group 7); B=(FRAC group 9 + 12); C=(FRAC group 11); D=(FRAC group 7 + 12)

Here, we have maximized the use of as many different FRAC groups as possible and spread their use as far apart as we can during the production season. Its important to remember that fungicides with more than one active ingredient (e.g., 7 + 11) should also be rotated as far apart as possible with fungicides that contain the single active ingredient (e.g., FRAC group 7 or FRAC group 11).

Monitoring fungicide efficacy

With the use of high-risk fungicides, all growers need to monitor fungicide efficacy accordingly. Once the lack of efficacy is detected there is a chance that fungicide resistance might be present. Importantly, the lack of efficacy should not be misconstrued with poor applications or waiting too long between fungicide applications. Reports of poor efficacy from Extension personnel from one region may not reflect fungicide efficacy in another region. Therefore, fungicide efficacy needs to be done at the farm level and the only way to accomplish this is to scout your fields and know what is and isn’t working for you.

The principles mentioned above also extend to other important diseases in vegetable production where there are multiple FRAC groups with high-risk fungicides available to control specific diseases. As a general rule, growers need to rotate as many different modes-of-action (i.e., fungicides from different FRAC groups) as possible during the production season to help mitigate fungicide resistance development in conjunction with best management practices.

For more information on fungicide use, FRAC groups, and specific control recommendations please see the 2020/2021 Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendation Guide.

 

Options for controlling basil downy mildew in the field

For over a decade, basil downy mildew (BDM) has caused significant losses in basil grown in organic and conventional field and greenhouse production across the United States. At the time of its introduction, there were very few fungicides labeled for its control making it nearly impossible to grow a successful crop in many areas of the country. The pathogen, Peronospora belbahrii, is an obligate parasite, meaning it needs a living host in order to survive. Thus, in more northern regions of the country that experience a freeze (i.e., winter), the pathogen will die when the host freezes during the fall. Because of this, the pathogen must be re-introduced the following spring or summer from southern regions of the country. This is similar to cucurbit downy mildew, where the pathogen can survive on the host that is growing in the field during the winter months (e.g., southern Florida or Mexico). The exact timing of when basil downy mildew may show up in your geographic region depends on a number of factors. The more southern you are located in the continental US, the more likely the pathogen will show up earlier in the spring or summer. In New Jersey the pathogen has been reported as early as 12 June and as late as 2 August. The first step in mitigating losses to basil downy mildew is in your selection of the best varieties. In recent years, there have been a number of new commercial sweet basil varieties released with a high level of resistance to basil downy mildew. Sweet basil varieties without BDM resistance should always be grown prior to the expected arrival of the pathogen in your region. There is a BDM monitoring website, led by Cornell University, which tracks the movement of the pathogen across the country each year. Growers can use the website to see where BDM has been reported across the country. Once BDM has been detected in your area you can expect it to remain active until the end of the production season. BDM resistant sweet basil varieties should always be grown after BDM has been detected in your region to help mitigate losses due to the disease. If you are located in the southern US, the easiest approach would be to use BDM resistant sweet basils the entire production season. All basil growers must remember that any of the new BDM resistant sweet basils are not “immune” to the disease. If disease pressure becomes extremely high or environmental conditions become highly conducive for disease development over a long period of time BDM resistance will break down for that season. Thus, it is extremely important to still initiate a fungicide program when using any DMR resistant sweet basil, especially if disease pressure is expected to be high.

For several years, the IR-4 Project has been working diligently with stakeholders and registrants to facilitate the registrations for a number of fungicide products (conventional, biopesticide, and organic) to control basil downy mildew. These efficacy studies have been done by Extension personnel at many Universities across the country. The following is a comprehensive list of conventional, organic, and biopesticides currently labeled for the control of BDM in the US.

Conventional fungicides currently labeled for basil downy mildew control:

  • Ranman 400 SC, FMC Agricultural Products
    • cyazofamid, FRAC Group 21
    • Can be used in a greenhouse, 0-day PHI
  • Revus, Syngenta Crop Protection,
    • mandipropamid, FRAC Group 40
    • Micora labeled for use in the greenhouse; 1-day PHI
  • Ridomil Gold, Syngenta Crop Protection
    • mefenoxam, FRAC Group 4
    • Field use only; 21-day PHI
  • Orondis Ultra, Syngenta Crop Protection (not yet approved by EPA)
    • oxathiapiprolin (FRAC Group 49) + mandipropamid (FRAC Group 40)
    • Field use only (foliar); 0-day PHI
  • Segovis, Syngenta Crop Protection
    • oxathiapiprolin, FRAC Group 49
    • Greenhouse use only; transplants for retail sale
  • Presidio, Valent USA
    • fluopicolide, FRAC Group 43
    • Field use only; 1-day PHI;
    • Adorn labeled for use in the greenhouse
  • Reason 500SC, Gowan Company and Bayer CropScience LP
    • fenamidone, FRAC Group 11
    • Field and greenhouse use; 2-day PHI

Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI Listed) federally registered fungicide products for basil downy mildew control include:

  • Actinovate AG (Streptomyces lydicus, Novozymes BioAg Inc.)
  • Double Nickel 55 and LC (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain D747 Certis U.S.A.)
  • Aviv (Bacillus subtilis strain IAB/BS03, STK Bio-Ag Technologies)
  • Regalia (extract of Reynoutria sachalinensis, Marrone Bio Innovations)
  • Trilogy (neem oil, Certis U.S.A.)
  • Milstop, Carb-O-Nator (potassium bicarbonate, BioWorks Inc., Certis USA LLC)
  • Oxidate (hydrogen dioxide, BioSafe Systems LLC)
  • Oxidate 2.0 (hydrogen dioxide; peroxyacetic acid, BioSafe Systems LLC).
  • Cueva Fungicide Concentrate (copper octanoate, Certis USA, LLC)
  • Romeo (cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117, Lesaffre Yeast Corporation)

Biopesticide products federally registered for basil downy mildew control that are not OMRI listed include:

  • mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid (K-Phite, Plant Food Systems)
  • phosphorous acid, mono- and dipotassium salts (Confine Extra, Winfield Solutions LLC)
  • phosphorous acid, mono- and dibasic sodium, potassium, and ammonium salts (Alude and Phostrol, Nufarm Agricultural Products)
  • potassium phosphite (Fosphite, JH Biotech, Inc.; Fungi-Phite, Plant Protectants, LLC; Prophyt, Helena Chemical Company; Rampart, Loveland Products, Inc.)
  • potassium bicarbonate (Armicarb 100, Helena Chemical Company)
  • a combination of potassium phosphate and potassium phosphite (Phorcephite, Loveland Products, Inc.)
  • sodium tetraborohydrate decahydrate (Prev-Am Ultra ORO Agri, Inc.)
  • hydrogen peroxide, peroxyacetic acid (Rendition, Certis USA LLC)
  • hydrogen peroxide; phosphorous acid; mono- and dipotassium salts (Oxiphos, BioSafe Systems LLC)
  • citric acid (Procidic, Greenspire Global Inc.)
  • hydrogen peroxide; peroxyacetic acid (Sanidate 12.0, BioSafe Systems, LLC)
  • Sodium tetraborohydrate decahydrate (Prev-Am Ultra, ORO Agri, Inc.)
  • Laminarin (Vacciplant, UPL NA Inc.)

Some important points to consider:

  1. Some of the conventional fungicides listed above are sold under different product names, depending on whether the product can be used in the field or greenhouse or for greenhouse transplant use. Other products have both a field and greenhouse use on the same product label.
  2. Although a product is listed as a biopesticide, it does not mean it has an OMRI-approved label. All growers should follow labels accordingly. Remember, the label is the law.

Proper control of BDM depends on a number of factors including the environment, disease pressure, and the timing of fungicide applications. Prolonged periods of wet weather and high relative humidity during the production season will make BDM control more difficult regardless of the products used to control it. The amount of disease pressure present in your field will also have an impact on your ability to control BDM. This is especially important in organic production systems where organic products often have better chance of working if disease pressure remains low. This is why growing a basil downy mildew resistant sweet basil is so important; as many organic products as reported by growers have not shown to be as effective as needed.

Research has shown that fungicide applications (e.g., conventional, bio-, or organic) initiated after the start of disease development most often leads to poor control and crop loss. Therefore, it is important to anticipate the arrival of BDM and initiate a fungicide program prior to the onset of disease development. This is also why monitoring the progress of the pathogen in the US is so important. In some areas, the disease might arrive on infected basil transplants from southern states. If this happens, the basil downy mildew will be in present long before the anticipated arrival of the pathogen due to weather patterns.

How products work against basil downy mildew

Conventional fungicides often work by inhibiting spore germination or spore production. Thus, the importance of having them applied prior to the arrival of the pathogen. Some of these products, such as mefenoxam or oxathiapiprolin, move within the plant, giving them an advantage when applied as drip applications. Biopesticides, such as the phosphites, are truly systemic and move up and down within the plants vascular system; however, research has shown that phosphites are more effective as foliar applications than when applied as drip applications. Some biopesticides, such as Oxidate and hydrogen peroxide, act as disinfestants killing spores they come into direct contact with. Because BDM sporulates on the underside of the leaf, these products (and most other fungicides) must reach the undersides of leaves during application in order to be effective. The same holds true for copper products. Copper is a protectant fungicide inhibiting spore germination. Therefore, it must reach the undersides of leaves. Organic products, such as those containing Bacillus and Streptomyces, act as an antigonist against BDM on the leaf surface and must be remain present in high enough populations on the leaf surface to provide control. This is often difficult to do because it requires multiple applications per week with short retreatment intervals. Often, these products are ineffective due to unfavorable environmental conditions. For growers trying to reduce conventional fungicide use, these products as well as disinfectant products will also kill off any biological control agents, so beware.

For information on Rutgers DMR sweet basils, where to purchase seed, as well as control strategies, and ongoing research efforts please follow the Rutgers basil downy mildew breeding program on Instagram at #Rutgersbasil.

Additional Resources:

Tracking basil downy mildew in the US

Managing basil downy mildew

Fungicides for the control of BDM

Controlling basil downy mildew in the greenhouse

 

By: Andy Wyenandt, Kathryn Homa (IR-4 Project), and Jim Simon, Department of Plant Biology, NJAES, Rutgers University

Plectosporium blight caused trouble in cucurbit fields in 2019

Plectosporium blight, also known as Microdochium blight or White speck, caused significant problems in some pumpkin fields last summer in New Jersey. The soil-borne fungal pathogen, although somewhat uncommon, can unexpectedly show up in some years and cause significant losses if left uncontrolled. The fungus survives in the soil on decaying plant debris where it can remain saphrophytic by surviving off organic matter. Infection is characterized by the production of numerous light tan to “bleached” spindle shaped lesions that develop on vines and the undersides of infected leaves. Heavily infected vines and leaves can die leading to premature defoliation and subsequent sunscald on fruit. In cases of heavy disease pressure, spores that are produced on the bottom sides of leaves fall and infect the topsides of fruit laying beneath the canopy. Infection of stems leads to premature browning and drying reduce their longevity. Fruit infection, in most cases, remain mostly cosmetic in nature reducing fruit quality and may predispose fruit to other opportunistic fruit rots. Plectosporium blight often shows up during periods of prolonged wet weather where the soil remains wet for extended periods. “Hot spots” typically appear in fields before the pathogen is further spread by driving rains and wind.

From a production standpoint, stay away from fields with known history of the disease for as long as possible; provide adequate spacing between plants in- and between rows (i.e., avoid the overcrowding of plants); avoid over (preplant) fertilization that can lead to thick, dense canopies; avoid overhead irrigation (if possible); avoid planting in area of a field that remains heavily shaded where soils tend to dry too slow.

Controlling Plectosporium blight begins with regular scouting, recognizing symptoms, and identifying “hot spots” in the field. Protectant fungicides, such as chlorothalonil, as well as those used in weekly maintenance spray programs for cucurbit powdery mildew control will help control Plectosporium blight as long they applied on a weekly schedule with a high volume of water with thorough coverage. To help improve control on the undersides of leaves, a FRAC code 11 fungicide such as Quadris Top or Pristine, can be added to the tank mix. Remember, FRAC code 11 fungicides have translaminar activity and will move from the top surface of the leaf to the bottom. Growers who grow powdery mildew resistant varieties need to remember to scout their fields regularly even if cucurbit powdery mildew has not been detected on the farm or if regular maintenance sprays haven’t begun.

 

White speck lesions

White speck lesions covering the surface of immature and mature pumpkin fruit. White speck will only cause cosmetic injury to fruit.

White speck on vine

White speck on vine and stem of infected pumpkin plant. Note the numerous small, white diamond shaped lesions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Organic Transplant Production: Suppressing Soil-borne Pathogens

Pathogens such as Fusarium, Pythium, Phytophthora, Thielaviopsis and Rhizoctonia that cause pre- and post-emergent damping-off can cause serious problems in organic (and conventional) transplant production. The key to controlling and/or suppressing damping-off pathogens with biological controls is keeping the biological populations high and continually present on root surfaces of the host, and by following good cultural practices. [Read more…]

Controlling basil downy mildew in the greenhouse

Basil downy mildew (BDM) can cause significant losses in the greenhouse. Once introduced into the greenhouse it can be very difficult to manage and eliminate. In the past few years, a vast amount of research has been done on understanding BDM biology and controlling it in the greenhouse using different cultural practices. Before we get to control strategies, let’s review what we know about the pathogen.

First, basil downy mildew is an obligate parasite – meaning it needs a living host to survive. As long as basil is in production in the greenhouse there will be a potential source of inoculum. Sources of inoculum can include fresh intact leaves, but also leaves discarded and fallen on the floor or in an open garbage container. This is important for greenhouse growers who produce basil year round or growers who are looking to extend basil production to later into the fall or earlier in the spring. The simplest method to break the disease cycle would be to stop growing basil for a short period of time and keeping your greenhouse as clean as possible. This would help break the disease cycle by removing the host. Sporangia produced by BDM are short-lived. Without a host their survival is only a few hours to a few days depending on the temperature and environmental conditions. The latent period (the time between infection and symptom development) can range from 5 to 10 days depending on the temperature and environmental conditions. This informs us that plants which appear uninfected may actually be infected without symptom development. Therefore, it is critically important to remove all plants from the operation before restarting production (especially if BDM is already present). A good time to stop greenhouse production (i.e., in the mid-Atlantic region or more northern regions) would be after the first hard freeze in the fall – after the freeze kills all potential sources of inoculum that could come from sources outside the greenhouse.

Control strategies using cultural practices in the greenhouse

Reducing relative humidity in the greenhouse

Basil downy mildew requires high relative humidity (>95%) for 7.5 hrs and at least 4 hrs of leaf wetness for sporulation. Sporulation has been shown to be significantly reduced, or not capable when relative humidity is less than 85%. Thus, maintaining relative humidity below 85% in the greenhouse can significantly help reduce spore production. If this is not possible interrupting the dew cycle (i.e., leaf wetness) with 10 minute periods of drying via fanning/venting every 2 to 4 hours can help reduce spore production.

Control using light

Research has shown that infected plants kept under 24 hours of continual light are unable to sporulate, this was also shown to be temperature-dependent. The type of lighting is also important. Incandescent light was fully inhibitory at 15 to 25oC, but not 10oC. Narrow band LED illumination with red light has been shown to be more inhibitory than blue light. Thus, lighting basil during the night every few hours at short periods of 10 minutes can help reduce sporulation.

Control using fanning and ventilation

Continuous fanning during the night has been shown to dramatically reduce BDM development by reducing leaf wetness (i.e., dew) and reducing relative humidity (keeping it below 95%). Recommendations from Israel are to initiate fanning when relative humidity reaches 70% in the greenhouse and to stop it when it is below 60%.

The key to controlling and mitigating BDM development in the greenhouse is controlling relative humidity and periods of leaf wetness to help reduce potential sporulation. Using a combination of cultural practices mentioned above can help reduce BDM development, but it will come at a cost to you in the form of additional hardware, temperature and relative humidity monitoring equipment and the cost of electricity. The first step in this process involves understanding where the initial source of inoculum may be coming from. Evidence for BDM being seed-borne is mixed. During the spring-summer-fall, greenhouse basil production will always be at-risk from infections coming from an outside source, including diseased seedlings you may be purchasing. Successfully breaking the BDM disease cycle (without the use of chemical inputs) in greenhouse operations has limited opportunities (e.g., in northern regions where freezing weather occurs). This can only occur in the fall, after freezing weather which can kill all outside sources of inoculum and by not carrying over infected plant material into the winter season, thus the need for a basil-free period during the production cycle. This is especially important in small greenhouse operations that produce basil organically or without the use of chemical input.

These management practices should significantly reduce your BDM problems though will require more of your attention and potentially additional equipment and supplies. Coupling best management practices with new downy mildew resistant basil varieties will further provide protection to you. Try the new basil downy mildew resistant varieties including Rutgers Obsession DMR, Rutgers Devotion DMR, Rutgers Passion DMR, and Rutgers Thunderstruck DMR or other DMR resistant sweet basils such as Prospera, and see which ones work best for you.

For information on Rutgers DMR sweet basils, where to purchase seed, as well as control strategies, and ongoing research efforts please follow the Rutgers basil downy mildew breeding program on Instagram at #Rutgersbasil.

Resources:

Tracking basil downy mildew in the US

Managing basil downy mildew

Fungicides for the control of BDM

Controlling basil downy mildew in the greenhouse

Authors: Andy Wyenandt and Jim Simon, Department of Plant Biology, Rutgers University