Organic Farm Advisory

The Plant & Pest Advisory serves NJ growers by reporting on important pests and recommending responses that are grounded in reproducible trials.

Articles in this section contain information helpful to the NJ commercial organic grower.

Sharing organic practice trial results between land-grant universities is a cost effective way to create a common knowledge base built on the strengths of individual programs. In the sidebar, find institutions with programs in organic agriculture which augment knowledge developed at the Rutgers New Jersey Ag Experiment Station.

Rutgers Cooperative Extension Field Guides: These concise guides help with decision making from pre-planting to harvest. For each crop listed, learn what pests to proactively look for as the season progresses, how to look for them, and when to take action.

Field Guide List

Phytophthora-tolerant and -resistant bell pepper variety trial reports

Phytophthora blight caused by Phytophthora capsici is one of the most economically important diseases in pepper, tomato, and cucurbit production in New Jersey. Each year for the past few decades Rutgers has evaluated new bell pepper cultivars and breeding lines for their resistance to P. capsici in field trials at the Rutgers Agricultural Research and Extension Center (RAREC) near Bridgeton, New Jersey, and in some years at research trials on farms near Vineland, NJ. The pathogen, an oomycete – ‘water mold’ is favored by warm weather and wet soils during the production season and can survive between seasons in the soil as oospores. Once found in a field, the pathogen can establish itself, and be very difficult to control even with the use of fungicides. Fortunately, in bell pepper, phytophthora blight resistant/tolerant cultivars have been commercially-available for over 20 years now and have been used extensively by bell pepper growers throughout the state. Each year, as mentioned above, Rutgers evaluates these bell peppers for their resistance to P. capsici in heavily-infested fields as well as evaluate each for their fruit quality characteristics (e.g., color, wall thickness, number of lobes, and development of ‘silvering’). Some important points to remember. The pathogen is consistently evolving because of its sexual activity (i.e., mating types and oospore production). The more researchers look into the pathogen’s genetic diversity, the more they seem to find. The pathogen can develop resistance to important fungicides. Insensitivity to mefenoxam and copper resistance have been know for a very long time. Finally, phytophthora resistant cultivars such as Paladin which have been used extensively in southern New Jersey for the past 20 years appear to be breaking down. Over the past few years a number of new phytophthora resistant/tolerant bell peppers with new sources of genetic resistance have been released and evaluated by Rutgers. Some of these new bell peppers also have varying levels of resistance to bacterial leaf spot, with one – ‘Playmaker’ having X10R resistance to bacterial leaf spot and tolerance to P. capsici. Because of the increased reports of bacterial leaf spot and copper resistance in recent years and the difficulty in controlling it alone, all bell peppers grown in NJ at some point will need to have to have X10R resistance and phytophthora blight resistance. Importantly, for organic bell pepper growers, if you have not already done so, you should be evaluating these new lines to see if they meet your needs. The easiest way to mitigate both diseases are to start with genetic resistance. Below are the bell pepper variety reports going back to 2005 for review.

For more information on recommended bell pepper cultivars please visit the Pepper Section in the 2020/2021 Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Productions Recommendations Guide.

Pepper Tolerance 2005

Pepper Tolerance 2006

Pepper Tolerance 2007

Pepper Tolerance 2008

Pepper Tolerance 2009

Pepper Tolerance 2010

Pepper Tolerance 2011

Pepper Tolerance 2012

Pepper Tolerance 2013

Pepper Tolerance 2014

Pepper Tolerance 2015

Pepper Tolerance 2016

By: Andy Wyenandt and Wesley Kline

 

Options for controlling basil downy mildew in the field

For over a decade, basil downy mildew (BDM) has caused significant losses in basil grown in organic and conventional field and greenhouse production across the United States. At the time of its introduction, there were very few fungicides labeled for its control making it nearly impossible to grow a successful crop in many areas of the country. The pathogen, Peronospora belbahrii, is an obligate parasite, meaning it needs a living host in order to survive. Thus, in more northern regions of the country that experience a freeze (i.e., winter), the pathogen will die when the host freezes during the fall. Because of this, the pathogen must be re-introduced the following spring or summer from southern regions of the country. This is similar to cucurbit downy mildew, where the pathogen can survive on the host that is growing in the field during the winter months (e.g., southern Florida or Mexico). The exact timing of when basil downy mildew may show up in your geographic region depends on a number of factors. The more southern you are located in the continental US, the more likely the pathogen will show up earlier in the spring or summer. In New Jersey the pathogen has been reported as early as 12 June and as late as 2 August. The first step in mitigating losses to basil downy mildew is in your selection of the best varieties. In recent years, there have been a number of new commercial sweet basil varieties released with a high level of resistance to basil downy mildew. Sweet basil varieties without BDM resistance should always be grown prior to the expected arrival of the pathogen in your region. There is a BDM monitoring website, led by Cornell University, which tracks the movement of the pathogen across the country each year. Growers can use the website to see where BDM has been reported across the country. Once BDM has been detected in your area you can expect it to remain active until the end of the production season. BDM resistant sweet basil varieties should always be grown after BDM has been detected in your region to help mitigate losses due to the disease. If you are located in the southern US, the easiest approach would be to use BDM resistant sweet basils the entire production season. All basil growers must remember that any of the new BDM resistant sweet basils are not “immune” to the disease. If disease pressure becomes extremely high or environmental conditions become highly conducive for disease development over a long period of time BDM resistance will break down for that season. Thus, it is extremely important to still initiate a fungicide program when using any DMR resistant sweet basil, especially if disease pressure is expected to be high.

For several years, the IR-4 Project has been working diligently with stakeholders and registrants to facilitate the registrations for a number of fungicide products (conventional, biopesticide, and organic) to control basil downy mildew. These efficacy studies have been done by Extension personnel at many Universities across the country. The following is a comprehensive list of conventional, organic, and biopesticides currently labeled for the control of BDM in the US.

Conventional fungicides currently labeled for basil downy mildew control:

  • Ranman 400 SC, FMC Agricultural Products
    • cyazofamid, FRAC Group 21
    • Can be used in a greenhouse, 0-day PHI
  • Revus, Syngenta Crop Protection,
    • mandipropamid, FRAC Group 40
    • Micora labeled for use in the greenhouse; 1-day PHI
  • Ridomil Gold, Syngenta Crop Protection
    • mefenoxam, FRAC Group 4
    • Field use only; 21-day PHI
  • Orondis Ultra, Syngenta Crop Protection (not yet approved by EPA)
    • oxathiapiprolin (FRAC Group 49) + mandipropamid (FRAC Group 40)
    • Field use only (foliar); 0-day PHI
  • Segovis, Syngenta Crop Protection
    • oxathiapiprolin, FRAC Group 49
    • Greenhouse use only; transplants for retail sale
  • Presidio, Valent USA
    • fluopicolide, FRAC Group 43
    • Field use only; 1-day PHI;
    • Adorn labeled for use in the greenhouse
  • Reason 500SC, Gowan Company and Bayer CropScience LP
    • fenamidone, FRAC Group 11
    • Field and greenhouse use; 2-day PHI

Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI Listed) federally registered fungicide products for basil downy mildew control include:

  • Actinovate AG (Streptomyces lydicus, Novozymes BioAg Inc.)
  • Double Nickel 55 and LC (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain D747 Certis U.S.A.)
  • Aviv (Bacillus subtilis strain IAB/BS03, STK Bio-Ag Technologies)
  • Regalia (extract of Reynoutria sachalinensis, Marrone Bio Innovations)
  • Trilogy (neem oil, Certis U.S.A.)
  • Milstop, Carb-O-Nator (potassium bicarbonate, BioWorks Inc., Certis USA LLC)
  • Oxidate (hydrogen dioxide, BioSafe Systems LLC)
  • Oxidate 2.0 (hydrogen dioxide; peroxyacetic acid, BioSafe Systems LLC).
  • Cueva Fungicide Concentrate (copper octanoate, Certis USA, LLC)
  • Romeo (cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain LAS117, Lesaffre Yeast Corporation)

Biopesticide products federally registered for basil downy mildew control that are not OMRI listed include:

  • mono- and di-potassium salts of phosphorous acid (K-Phite, Plant Food Systems)
  • phosphorous acid, mono- and dipotassium salts (Confine Extra, Winfield Solutions LLC)
  • phosphorous acid, mono- and dibasic sodium, potassium, and ammonium salts (Alude and Phostrol, Nufarm Agricultural Products)
  • potassium phosphite (Fosphite, JH Biotech, Inc.; Fungi-Phite, Plant Protectants, LLC; Prophyt, Helena Chemical Company; Rampart, Loveland Products, Inc.)
  • potassium bicarbonate (Armicarb 100, Helena Chemical Company)
  • a combination of potassium phosphate and potassium phosphite (Phorcephite, Loveland Products, Inc.)
  • sodium tetraborohydrate decahydrate (Prev-Am Ultra ORO Agri, Inc.)
  • hydrogen peroxide, peroxyacetic acid (Rendition, Certis USA LLC)
  • hydrogen peroxide; phosphorous acid; mono- and dipotassium salts (Oxiphos, BioSafe Systems LLC)
  • citric acid (Procidic, Greenspire Global Inc.)
  • hydrogen peroxide; peroxyacetic acid (Sanidate 12.0, BioSafe Systems, LLC)
  • Sodium tetraborohydrate decahydrate (Prev-Am Ultra, ORO Agri, Inc.)
  • Laminarin (Vacciplant, UPL NA Inc.)

Some important points to consider:

  1. Some of the conventional fungicides listed above are sold under different product names, depending on whether the product can be used in the field or greenhouse or for greenhouse transplant use. Other products have both a field and greenhouse use on the same product label.
  2. Although a product is listed as a biopesticide, it does not mean it has an OMRI-approved label. All growers should follow labels accordingly. Remember, the label is the law.

Proper control of BDM depends on a number of factors including the environment, disease pressure, and the timing of fungicide applications. Prolonged periods of wet weather and high relative humidity during the production season will make BDM control more difficult regardless of the products used to control it. The amount of disease pressure present in your field will also have an impact on your ability to control BDM. This is especially important in organic production systems where organic products often have better chance of working if disease pressure remains low. This is why growing a basil downy mildew resistant sweet basil is so important; as many organic products as reported by growers have not shown to be as effective as needed.

Research has shown that fungicide applications (e.g., conventional, bio-, or organic) initiated after the start of disease development most often leads to poor control and crop loss. Therefore, it is important to anticipate the arrival of BDM and initiate a fungicide program prior to the onset of disease development. This is also why monitoring the progress of the pathogen in the US is so important. In some areas, the disease might arrive on infected basil transplants from southern states. If this happens, the basil downy mildew will be in present long before the anticipated arrival of the pathogen due to weather patterns.

How products work against basil downy mildew

Conventional fungicides often work by inhibiting spore germination or spore production. Thus, the importance of having them applied prior to the arrival of the pathogen. Some of these products, such as mefenoxam or oxathiapiprolin, move within the plant, giving them an advantage when applied as drip applications. Biopesticides, such as the phosphites, are truly systemic and move up and down within the plants vascular system; however, research has shown that phosphites are more effective as foliar applications than when applied as drip applications. Some biopesticides, such as Oxidate and hydrogen peroxide, act as disinfestants killing spores they come into direct contact with. Because BDM sporulates on the underside of the leaf, these products (and most other fungicides) must reach the undersides of leaves during application in order to be effective. The same holds true for copper products. Copper is a protectant fungicide inhibiting spore germination. Therefore, it must reach the undersides of leaves. Organic products, such as those containing Bacillus and Streptomyces, act as an antigonist against BDM on the leaf surface and must be remain present in high enough populations on the leaf surface to provide control. This is often difficult to do because it requires multiple applications per week with short retreatment intervals. Often, these products are ineffective due to unfavorable environmental conditions. For growers trying to reduce conventional fungicide use, these products as well as disinfectant products will also kill off any biological control agents, so beware.

For information on Rutgers DMR sweet basils, where to purchase seed, as well as control strategies, and ongoing research efforts please follow the Rutgers basil downy mildew breeding program on Instagram at #Rutgersbasil.

Additional Resources:

Tracking basil downy mildew in the US

Managing basil downy mildew

Fungicides for the control of BDM

Controlling basil downy mildew in the greenhouse

 

By: Andy Wyenandt, Kathryn Homa (IR-4 Project), and Jim Simon, Department of Plant Biology, NJAES, Rutgers University

Organic Transplant Production: Suppressing Soil-borne Pathogens

Pathogens such as Fusarium, Pythium, Phytophthora, Thielaviopsis and Rhizoctonia that cause pre- and post-emergent damping-off can cause serious problems in organic (and conventional) transplant production. The key to controlling and/or suppressing damping-off pathogens with biological controls is keeping the biological populations high and continually present on root surfaces of the host, and by following good cultural practices. [Read more…]

Controlling basil downy mildew in the greenhouse

Basil downy mildew (BDM) can cause significant losses in the greenhouse. Once introduced into the greenhouse it can be very difficult to manage and eliminate. In the past few years, a vast amount of research has been done on understanding BDM biology and controlling it in the greenhouse using different cultural practices. Before we get to control strategies, let’s review what we know about the pathogen.

First, basil downy mildew is an obligate parasite – meaning it needs a living host to survive. As long as basil is in production in the greenhouse there will be a potential source of inoculum. Sources of inoculum can include fresh intact leaves, but also leaves discarded and fallen on the floor or in an open garbage container. This is important for greenhouse growers who produce basil year round or growers who are looking to extend basil production to later into the fall or earlier in the spring. The simplest method to break the disease cycle would be to stop growing basil for a short period of time and keeping your greenhouse as clean as possible. This would help break the disease cycle by removing the host. Sporangia produced by BDM are short-lived. Without a host their survival is only a few hours to a few days depending on the temperature and environmental conditions. The latent period (the time between infection and symptom development) can range from 5 to 10 days depending on the temperature and environmental conditions. This informs us that plants which appear uninfected may actually be infected without symptom development. Therefore, it is critically important to remove all plants from the operation before restarting production (especially if BDM is already present). A good time to stop greenhouse production (i.e., in the mid-Atlantic region or more northern regions) would be after the first hard freeze in the fall – after the freeze kills all potential sources of inoculum that could come from sources outside the greenhouse.

Control strategies using cultural practices in the greenhouse

Reducing relative humidity in the greenhouse

Basil downy mildew requires high relative humidity (>95%) for 7.5 hrs and at least 4 hrs of leaf wetness for sporulation. Sporulation has been shown to be significantly reduced, or not capable when relative humidity is less than 85%. Thus, maintaining relative humidity below 85% in the greenhouse can significantly help reduce spore production. If this is not possible interrupting the dew cycle (i.e., leaf wetness) with 10 minute periods of drying via fanning/venting every 2 to 4 hours can help reduce spore production.

Control using light

Research has shown that infected plants kept under 24 hours of continual light are unable to sporulate, this was also shown to be temperature-dependent. The type of lighting is also important. Incandescent light was fully inhibitory at 15 to 25oC, but not 10oC. Narrow band LED illumination with red light has been shown to be more inhibitory than blue light. Thus, lighting basil during the night every few hours at short periods of 10 minutes can help reduce sporulation.

Control using fanning and ventilation

Continuous fanning during the night has been shown to dramatically reduce BDM development by reducing leaf wetness (i.e., dew) and reducing relative humidity (keeping it below 95%). Recommendations from Israel are to initiate fanning when relative humidity reaches 70% in the greenhouse and to stop it when it is below 60%.

The key to controlling and mitigating BDM development in the greenhouse is controlling relative humidity and periods of leaf wetness to help reduce potential sporulation. Using a combination of cultural practices mentioned above can help reduce BDM development, but it will come at a cost to you in the form of additional hardware, temperature and relative humidity monitoring equipment and the cost of electricity. The first step in this process involves understanding where the initial source of inoculum may be coming from. Evidence for BDM being seed-borne is mixed. During the spring-summer-fall, greenhouse basil production will always be at-risk from infections coming from an outside source, including diseased seedlings you may be purchasing. Successfully breaking the BDM disease cycle (without the use of chemical inputs) in greenhouse operations has limited opportunities (e.g., in northern regions where freezing weather occurs). This can only occur in the fall, after freezing weather which can kill all outside sources of inoculum and by not carrying over infected plant material into the winter season, thus the need for a basil-free period during the production cycle. This is especially important in small greenhouse operations that produce basil organically or without the use of chemical input.

These management practices should significantly reduce your BDM problems though will require more of your attention and potentially additional equipment and supplies. Coupling best management practices with new downy mildew resistant basil varieties will further provide protection to you. Try the new basil downy mildew resistant varieties including Rutgers Obsession DMR, Rutgers Devotion DMR, Rutgers Passion DMR, and Rutgers Thunderstruck DMR or other DMR resistant sweet basils such as Prospera, and see which ones work best for you.

For information on Rutgers DMR sweet basils, where to purchase seed, as well as control strategies, and ongoing research efforts please follow the Rutgers basil downy mildew breeding program on Instagram at #Rutgersbasil.

Resources:

Tracking basil downy mildew in the US

Managing basil downy mildew

Fungicides for the control of BDM

Controlling basil downy mildew in the greenhouse

Authors: Andy Wyenandt and Jim Simon, Department of Plant Biology, Rutgers University

 

Damping-off: Identifying and Controlling Pathogens in Transplant Production

It is extremely important to know which pathogen is causing damping-off problems and which fungicide to properly apply. The key to controlling damping-off is being proactive instead of reactive. Always refer to the fungicide label for crop use, pathogens controlled, and application rates.

Damping-off is caused by a number of important vegetable pathogens and is very common during transplant production. Damping-off can kill seedlings before they break the soil line (pre-emergent damping-off) or kill seedlings soon after they emerge (post-emergent damping-off). Common pathogens that cause damping-off include Pythium, Phytophthora, Rhizoctonia and Fusarium spp.

Control of damping-off depends on a number of factors. First, is recognizing the conditions which may be leading to the problem (i.e., watering schedule/greenhouse growing conditions) and second, identifying the pathogen causing the problem. Reducing the chances for damping-off always begins with good sanitation practices prior to transplant production.

Conditions Favoring Damping-off

Although all four pathogens are associated with damping-off, the conditions which favor their development are very different. In general, Phytophthora and Pythium are more likely to cause damping-off in cool, wet or overwatered soils that aren’t allowed to dry out due to cloudy weather or cooler temperatures. Conversely, Rhizoctonia and Fusarium are more likely to cause damping-off under warmer, drier conditions especially if plug trays are kept on the dry side to help reduce transplant growth. [Read more…]

Cucurbit Powdery and Downy Mildew: A Tale of Two Pathogens

Cucurbit powdery and downy mildew are two important pathogens of cucurbit crops throughout the mid-Atlantic region. Each disease has the ability to cause significant losses and can often show up in cucurbit plantings at the same time during the production season making control difficult. Its important for growers to remember that each pathogen belongs to a different group of fungi (powdery mildew – the ascomycetes and downy mildew – oomycetes)  which means that different classes of fungicides (i.e., different FRAC codes) are needed for the proper control of each disease. Thus, at any time of the growing season growers may have three choices: control one or the other, or control both at the same time. Before we get to control options, lets take a look at each one, and what has changed during the past few years.

Cucurbit powdery mildew

Up until 2004, cucurbit powdery was considered the most destructive disease in cucurbit production, that all changed with the re-emergence of cucurbit downy mildew. Cucurbit powdery mildew (CPM), in past years, was thought to be caused by two different pathogens, Podosphaera xanthii (formerly Sphaerotheca fuliginea) or Golovinomyces chicoracearum var. chicoracearum (formerly Erysiphe cichoracearum), with the former being reported more in the US and worldwide. In general, E. cichoracearum was more commonly found during cooler weather, with P. xanthii preferring hotter weather. What is the importance of knowing which species is present? Knowing which species are present, or more prevalent in the overall population of the pathogen will have important impacts in breeding programs, control strategies, and fungicide resistance management strategies. In 2019, researchers from IL and NY conducted a survey of CPM isolates collected from 6 different cucurbit hosts from around the US. The survey, with the use of morphological characterization and genotyping-by-sequence (GSB) methods and analysis, determined that 100% of the CPM isolates collected in the US were Podosphaera xanthii. Virulence testing with a subset of samples determined that there were some differences in the ability to cause disease, which was not unexpected. Cucurbit powdery mildew is an obligate parasite, and like cucurbit downy mildew, must have a living host in order to survive the winter, or importantly, as in the case of powdery mildew produce chasmothecia which allow the pathogen to overwinter. The production of chasmothecia shows the pathogen is reproducing sexually which gives rise to genetic diversity in the CPM population which can lead to differences in virulence as well as fungicide resistance development. Cucurbit powdery mildew is known to produce chasmothecia in different regions of the US, and has been observed in New Jersey in some years. The role of clasmothecia production and if it allows overwintering in NJ (and elsewhere) is not well understood. In general, CPM moves up the east coast each spring as cucurbit crops are planted up the coast, eventually reaching the mid-Atlantic region sometime in the early to mid summer making preventative fungicide applications necessary. The fungicides that have been used to control the pathogen in southern regions may greatly impact efficacy and control strategies in our region because of potential fungicide resistance development. Importantly, there are a number of cucurbit crops with very good genetic resistance to CPM. These varieties can help delay disease onset and may help reduce fungicide input and should be considered as a part of any disease management plan, especially in organic production systems.

Cucurbit downy mildew

As mentioned earlier, in 2004, cucurbit downy mildew (CDM) re-emerged in the US with a vengeance causing significant losses in cucurbit production. In most years prior to this, concern for CDM control was minimal, since the pathogen arrived late in the growing season (in more northern regions), or the pathogen caused little damage, or never appeared. After 2004, with significant losses at stake, and with very few fungicides labeled for its proper control, CDM became a serious threat to cucurbit production. Importantly, at the time, cucumber varieties with very good levels of CDM resistance were no longer resistant, suggesting a major shift in the pathogen population. Research done over the past 15 years has led to a better understanding of the pathogen. Recent research has determined that the CDM falls into two separate clades: Clade I and Clade II. Some CDM (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) isolates fall into Clade I which predominately infect watermelon, pumpkin, and squash, where CDM isolates in Clade II predominately infect cucumber and cantaloupe. Research suggests that isolates in Clade II can quickly become resistant to specific fungicides (NCSU). Most cucumber varieties are resistant to Clade 1 isolates, but there is no resistance currently available for Clade 2 isolates. For pickling cucumber the varieties, Citadel and Peacemaker, are tolerant to clade 2 isolates. For slicing cucumbers, the varieties SV3462CS and SV4142CL are tolerant to Clade 2 isolates. All organic and greenhouse growers are encouraged to use tolerant varieties since chemical control options are very limited (NCSU). An extended list of cucumber varieties with CDM resistance from the University of Florida can be found here. For the past decade, researchers from around the US have been closely monitoring and forecasting the progress of CDM through a website hosted by NCSU. The CDMpipe website is currently in the process of an upgrade and will now be hosted by Penn State University. All cucurbit growers are encouraged to sign up to the CDMpipe website to help them know what cucurbit crops are being infected (and where) and to follow the forecasting to know where the pathogen may move to next. As a note, in recent years, CDM control with certain fungicides has varied significantly depending on the cucurbit host and geographic region. This is extremely important since two clades of the pathogen are potentially present (affecting host range) as well as having a potential impact on control strategies. How do you know which clade may be present on your farm? Follow the reports. If CDM is mostly present in cucumber crops as it works its way up the east coast, then you are most likely to see it infect cucumber and melon on your farm first. Scout your fields regularly, especially if CDM is in the immediate region. Pay very close attention to symptom development and on what cucurbit crop(s) you see it on, this is especially important if you grow more than one cucurbit crop. Like CPM, once CDM arrives in the region preventative fungicide applications will be necessary.

Fungicide resistance development in CPM and CDM

Fungicide resistance development in cucurbit powdery mildew is well documented. In the mid-Atlantic region, resistance has been reported in FRAC code 3 (DMI fungicides – Nova, Rally), 7 (SDHIs – boscalid), 11 (strobilurins – Quadris, Pristine), 13 (quinoxyfen – Quintec), and U6 (cyflufenamid -Torino). All of these fungicides have a high risk for resistance development because of their specific modes of action. Other currently labeled fungicides for CPM control, such as fluopyram (Luna, FRAC code 7) and metrafenone (Vivando, FRAC code 50) are also at risk for fungicide resistance development. All cucurbit growers are strongly encouraged to rotate as many different fungicides with different modes of action (i.e., from different FRAC codes) to help reduce the chances for fungicide resistance development. Growers are also strongly encouraged to scout fields on a regular basis to help determine any loss of fungicide efficacy. If loss of efficacy is present, the grower should avoid using that particular fungicide (FRAC code). The good news for CPM control, there are a number of fungicides with different modes of action in different FRAC codes and the grower has a number of options to chose from. All growers should follow use recommendations on labels and avoid overusing one mode of action, even if it works well.

Loss of efficacy in the control of CDM has also been documented in FRAC code 4 (mefenoxam), FRAC code 11 fungicides (azoxystrobin), and FRAC code 43 (fluopicolide). Importantly, most fungicides labeled for the control of CDM are at-risk for resistance development because of the specific modes of action. These include Ranman (cyazofamid, FRAC code 21), Gavel/Zing! (zoxamide, 22), Tanos/Curzate (cymoxanil, 27), Previcur Flex (propamocarb HCL, 28), Forum/Revus (dimethomorph, 40), Zampro (ametoctradin, 45), and Orondis (oxathiapiprolin, 49). Importantly, just like with CPM control, there are a number of CDM fungicides with different modes of action in different FRAC codes that the grower has a number of options to chose from. Again, all growers should follow use recommendations on labels and avoid overusing one mode of action, even if it works well. As with CPM, If loss of efficacy is present, the grower should avoid using that particular fungicide (FRAC code) for CDM control.

Growers should remember that fungicides specifically labeled for CPM control won’t control CDM, and fungicides labeled for CDM control won’t control CPM. Therefore, following disease monitoring and forecasting website, scouting fields, paying close attention to host crops, choosing varieties with CDM or CPM resistance, and following proper fungicide resistant management guidelines remain critically important for successful CPM and CDM control.

For more information please see the upcoming 2020/2021 Mid-Atlantic Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations.

References:

North Carolina State University

https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/cucurbit-downy-mildew

University of Florida

https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pp325

2018 Fungicide Resistance Management Guidelines for Cucurbit Downy and Powdery Mildew Control in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Regions of the US.

http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/volume19/number1/PHP-12-17-0077-BR.pdf