Beech Leaf Disease in New Jersey

A new disease of beech trees (Fagus spp.) called ‘Beech leaf disease’ (BLD) has increasingly been observed in landscaped and forested areas in the Northeastern USA and Canada. The disease was first reported on American beech, Fagus grandifolia, in Lake County Ohio in 2012, and has spread to Pennsylvania, New York, Ontario (Canada), Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, West Virginia and Virginia. In New Jersey, the disease was first reported in 2020 and has been confirmed in 10 counties including: Bergen, Essex, Hunterdon, Mercer, Monmouth, Morris, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex, and Union.

Beech leaf disease detection map

New Jersey Beech Leaf Disease Detection Map

BLD primarily affects American beech,  F. grandifolia, however, it has also been observed on European beech, F. sylvatica; Oriental beech, F. orientalis; and Chinese beech, F. engleriana. All of the specimens seen in the Rutgers Plant Diagnostic Lab have been American beech.

A foliar nematode species has been isolated from beech leaves and buds. This nematode was initially identified as Litylenchus crenatae subspecies crenatae, a species described in Japan on Fagus crenata that does not cause disease. In 2020, the cause of BLD was proven to be a newly described foliar nematode, Litylenchus crenatae subsp. mccannii, which is closely related to L. crenatae subsp. crenatae. L. crenatae subsp. crenatae has not been found on ornamental plantings of American beech in Japan. Conversely, L. crenatae subsp. mccannii has not been found on ornamental plantings of Japanese beech in North America. While the origin of L. crenatae subsp. mccannii and its native distribution are not clear, all other known species of nematode in the genus Litylenchus are found in the Pacific Rim.

Litylenchus crenatae

Litylenchus crenatae subsp. mccannii isolated from beech leaf tissues in the Rutgers Plant Diagnostic Laboratory. Photo: Sabrina Tirpak, Rutgers PDL

In 2019, research scientists at the USDA took nematodes from diseased trees and inoculated them onto the buds of young, healthy trees in a greenhouse, waited for symptoms to appear, then re-isolated the nematode from the affected leaves. This process is called Koch’s postulate’s, which is plant pathology’s gold standard for verifying the cause of a disease.

Despite these findings, some researchers question the role of the nematode as the only cause of BLD. Recent reports suggest that diseased beech leaves also contained a fungus and 4 species of bacteria that are also carried by the nematode. This research suggests that both the nematode and a pathogen that it carries may be contributing to the disease. The original research from the USDA, however, suggests that nematode feeding alone can cause the disease.

The BLD nematode predominantly overwinters in buds. The nematode migrates from leaves to the buds beginning in August. After bud-break in the spring, the nematodes cannot be found in symptomatic leaf tissue until late-June or early-July. DNA-based markers, however, can confirm the presence of the nematode, presumably due to eggs, in these leaves. By early summer, the nematodes appear in the leaves and are easily identified in a laboratory setting. The numbers of nematodes in the infected leaves increase through fall. It is assumed that some nematodes overwinter in leaves on the ground. The mechanisms of transmission and spread within trees, among trees, and from site to site, are unknown. Research is ongoing in the hopes of answering these questions.

The initial symptoms of BLD include dark-green striped bands between the veins of leaves. The dark-green bands are easily seen by holding leaves up to the light and/or looking up into the canopy. In many cases, the size of the affected leaves is reduced. The banded areas usually become leathery-like, and leaf distortions–curling and crinkling–are often observed. These symptoms are best seen by looking down on the top of the leaf.

Closeup of leaves

As seen from below, dark-green striping is clearly evident between the leaf veins. Photo: Jerry Giordano, Cornell Cooperative Extension

Distorted leaves

As seen from above, affected leaves are smaller, leathery, and distorted. Photo: Jerry Giordano, Cornell Cooperative Extension

Affected leaves

Affected leaves thicken and may yellow between the veins. Photo: Sabrina Tirpak, Rutgers PDL

As symptoms progress, aborted buds, reduced leaf production, and premature leaf drop lead to an overall reduction in canopy cover. This ultimately results in the death of saplings within 2-5 years of infection and of large trees within 6 years. In areas where the disease is established, the proportion of symptomatic trees can reach more than 90%. There is significant concern that this disease will dramatically reduce the numbers of beech and their ecological services in Northeastern forests.

Because the research on BLD etiology is ongoing, and questions regarding dissemination and spread remain unanswered, management and control options are limited. Several pesticide options are currently being investigated including: abamectin, emamectin benzoate, and potassium-phosphite as potential controls. The avermectin materials are known to be effective nematicides in other animal and plant systems and may eventually be determined to be efficacious for this disease. At this time, however, the efficacy of any of these materials is unknown and are not currently recommended as treatments. Be aware that much more work needs to be done to understand this new disease before effective treatment protocols can be discussed.

In general, the spread of invasive species can be prevented by restricting the movement of plant materials and monitoring trees closely for signs and symptoms. BLD has spread very quickly eastward in the United States and is concerning to all of us. The Rutgers Plant Diagnostic Laboratory and our partners at the New Jersey Division of Community Forestry are interested in tracking this disease within New Jersey. Please contact the lab if you suspect a problem. Samples can be evaluated free of charge for the 2022 growing season.

Dog-Day Cicadas Are Still Singing, but Cicada Killer Wasps Aren’t Fans

Full side view of the dog-day cicada showing the black eyes & dark green body coloration plus the clear wings with green veins. (Photo Credit: Steven K. Rettke, Rutgers Coop. Ext.)

They Get No Respect:

For at least the past 7-8 weeks, the annual “dog-day” cicadas (Neotibicen canicularis) have been heard singing throughout many NJ locations.They tend to get little respect or media attention & could be called the “weak sister” of the far more publicised periodical cicada species that were present this past spring. The annual cicadas species have less dense populations & their lifecycles are usually 2-3 years compared to the 13-17 years for the periodical cicada species. However, the dog-day cicada emergence is not synchronized, therefore some will emerge every year. Like periodical cicadas, the dog-day males also sing to females to attract a mate. However, the dog-day cicada “electric buzz-saw” screams are not synchronized & even though each individual male is loud, they are not nearly as deafening nor continuous as the noise produced by periodical cicadas. Each male sings for only about 15 seconds & when their numbers in an area are relatively sparse, there is typically many intermittent periods of silence. When populations are more dense, then there may be a continuous non-synchronized buzzing sound that emanates throughout an area.

[Read more…]

Summer Pests on Oaks: Oak Sawflies, Oak Spider Mites & Oak Lace Bugs

This Rutgers Plant & Pest Advisory blog will review a few of the landscape summer pests specific to mostly oak trees (Quercus). The scarlet oak sawfly will be discussed first, followed by the oak spider mite & finally the oak lace bug. All three pest species have multiple generations during the summer months & therefore can be observed throughout most of the season. None of the pest species are usually considered to be life-threatening to oak hosts but they can cause significant & undesirable aesthetic injuries. However, it could be stated that these pests may have bark, but they have little bite. Therefore, with large oak trees the spraying of many gallons of pesticides would not be justified.

Spraying many gallons of a pesticide against most pests on a large oak as shown above is rarely justified. (Photo Credit: Steven K. Rettke, Rutgers Coop. Ext.)

[Read more…]

Mimosa Webworm Activity Begins

 

Mimosa webworm early webbing of honeylocust leaflets at outer branches. (Photo Credit: Steven K. Rettke, Rutgers Coop. Ext.)

Mimosa Webworm (Homadaula anisocentra) = (880-1200 GDD = 1st generation egg hatch): The overwintering pupal cocoons of this non-native caterpillar emerged as adults last June & eggs have been laid on leaflets or small twigs of honeylocust (Gleditisia tricanthos ) trees in NJ. This caterpillar also feeds on mimosa trees, but since honeylocust plantings in the urban environment are more common, we usually encountered them on these trees. Within many areas of the state, the early, initial 1st generation webbings by 1st instar caterpillars are now becoming noticeable at the outer edges of the leaf canopy.

 

[Read more…]

Some Key Soft Scale Pests in the Landscape

Soft Scale Species Controls (June & July): Compared to armored scales, the soft scales are relatively easy to suppress with either contact sprays or systemic treatments. Some of the common landscape soft scale species in NJ include calico, Fletcher, Indian wax, cottony maple, cottony camellia, spruce bud, European fruit lecanium, pine tortoise, striped pine, magnolia, & tulip tree. Although large soft scale adult females are more difficult to control, the immature nymphs are often vulnerable to sprays when good coverage is achieved. However, there are some species that have proven to be more challenging to control. Two good examples include the calico scale & Indian wax scale species. Horticultural oil sprays are often recommended to control immature scale nymphs, but sometimes against the calico & Indian wax species the efficacies are less consistent. This blog will first review soft scale management options & then show photographs & discuss the life cycles of the following soft scale species with crawlers emerging during June & July: (1) Indian wax, (2) calico, (3) cottony camellia, (4) spruce bud, & (5) Fletcher.

Drawing of a soft scale feeding on woody bark. All soft scale species suck sap from phloem vascular tissues. (Drawing Credit: John Davidson, University of Maryland)

[Read more…]

COVID Delta Variant and NJ Agriculture

As the farming season progresses so does concern for the increased prevalence of the COVID Delta variant in the region.  We asked Don Schaffner, Extension Specialist, about the Delta variant and if we should be concerned about it.  If you or your farm workers are in need of a vaccine please email njfarmvax@njaes.rutgers.edu and an Extension team member will assist you with finding local vaccination locations and/or determine if an on-farm vaccine clinic is possible for your workers.  If you have questions about the vaccine visit the Rutgers On-Farm Food Safety Vaccine Education for Growers website for information in multiple languages.

Meredith Melendez: Are we seeing an increase in cases of the COVID Delta variant in New Jersey or the region?

Don Schaffner: Yes. According to CDC, Region 2 (New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands) had only 3.1% of all infections due to the Delta variant for the week ending 5/22/21. This percentage had jumped to 17.7% week for the week ending 6/5/21. There are not further updates at this time.

Also according to the CDC in NJ 3.4% all infections were due to the Delta variant for the week ending 5/22/21. No further New Jersey specific updates are available at this time.

MM: How is the Delta variant different than the COVID cases we saw over the past year?

DS: There are a number of reasons why there is increased concern over the Delta variant. Epidemiological data shows that the variant has increased transmissibility (i.e. it is more easily spread from person to person) than the original strain. Estimates indicate that it is about 60% more transmissible. This means that for every one person infected by the original virus, on average for the same conditions the Delta variant would spread to about 1.6 people.

One of the ways of combating the virus once someone is infected is with monoclonal antibody treatments. There is evidence that the Delta variant is more resistant to this important treatment.

There is also evidence that the Delta virus is not as readily neutralized by post-vaccination sera. Sera contain the antibodies in people that are vaccinated.

MM: Are the Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J vaccines as effective against the Delta variant?

DS: Yes.  The Johnson & Johnson vaccine appears to be about 60% effective against the delta variant. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are about 88% effective after the second dose (vs. over 90% for other variants). So while the vaccines are less effective against the Delta variant, it is still much better to be vaccinated than not.

MM: Why should someone get vaccinated now if they haven’t already?

DS: Unvaccinated individuals are vulnerable to all variants of the virus. These variants arise through the natural evolution when the virus replicates inside a sick person. Since the vaccines can stop some people from getting infected, the more people that are vaccinated the better control we will have over these variants and stop new variants from evolving.