Andy Wyenandt

This is an archive of Dr. Wyenandt's posts on the Plant and Pest Advisory.

Controlling strawberry fruit rots with an emphasis on mitigating fungicide resistance development

Fruit rots in strawberry can cause significant losses if not recognized early and properly controlled. The use of good cultural practices such as keeping fields weed-free, promoting good drainage and air movement, long crop rotations, and preventative fungicide applications are critically important for reducing the potential development of fruit rots in strawberry.

Pathogens such as anthracnose fruit rot (Collectotrichum acutatum, C. gloeosporioides), gray mold (Botrytis cinera), and leather rot (Phytophthora cactorum) can become systemic problems in strawberry fields and can be difficult to manage over the lifetime of the planting. Importantly, fungicide resistance development in the pathogens that cause fruit rot in strawberry are widely documented; mostly in Botrytis.

Anthracnose Fruit Rot

Anthracnose fruit rot of strawberry

Anthracnose Fruit Rot of Strawberry

Anthracnose fruit rot can cause serious losses if not controlled. Symptoms of anthracnose include the development of circular, sunken lesions on infected fruit. Often pinkish/tan colored spore masses will develop in the center of lesions. Anthracnose in strawberry is caused by Colletotrichum spp. Spore production, germination and fruit infection are favored by warm, humid weather. The fungus can overwinter on infected plants, in plant debris or on weed hosts. Spores are dispersed by splashing water and can infect green and mature fruit. Control begins with protectant fungicides from flowering through harvest.  Begin sprays no later than 10% bloom or prior to disease development and continue on a 7 to 10 day interval.  Use the higher fungicide rate and shorter intervals when disease pressure is high.  Do not make more than two consecutive applications of the same fungicide before switching to a fungicide in a different FRAC group. Fungicide resistance in C. acutatum and C. gloeosporioides to FRAC group 11 fungicides (azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin) have been reported in FL in recent years.

 

Leather Rot

Strawberry-Leather-Rot-2013-300x235

Strawberry Leather Rot

Leather rot caused by Phytophthora cactorum can cause losses during warm, wet weather with extended periods of rainfall. Infection can take place during all stages of fruit development as long as favorable conditions are present. Infected fruit turn brown and have blotchy tough appearance. Infections typically occur in fruit that are in direct contact with the soil, but the pathogen can also be splashed onto fruit via rainfall and wind.Research by Dr. Mike Ellis, Using Fungicides to Control Strawberry Fruit Rots in Ohio, has shown that FRAC code 11 fungicides such as Cabrio, Abound, and Pristine are effective against leather rot. Pristine being the fungicide of choice because it also provides control of gray mold and anthracnose. Follow the link above for an excellent review of all three of these diseases and a useful efficacy table. Resistance to mefenoxam has been reported only in SC to date and resistance to QoI fungicides (FRAC group 11) in P. cactorum, from both crown and fruit infections, have been reported in FL in the past 5 years.

 

Gray Mold (Botrytis Fruit Rot)

Botrytis fruit rot of strawberry

Gray Mold (Botrytis Fruit Rot)
of Strawberry

Gray mold is often a serious problem during extended cool, wet periods when fruit are sizing and reaching maturity. Symptoms of gray mold are the diagnostic grey, fuzzy growth that will cover entire fruit. Control of gray mold, like the other diseases, begins with recognizing the conditions for its development, its symptoms, and preventative fungicide applications. Start sprays when plants begin to bloom, because 90% of fruit infections occur through the flower, and repeat every 7-10 days. Increase spray intervals during persistent dry periods, but decrease intervals to 5-7 days during very wet periods.  Four weekly sprays starting at 5-10% bloom are usually sufficient for season-long control. Tank-mix and rotate fungicides from different FRAC codes to reduce the chances for fungicide resistance development.

Fungicide resistance in Botrytis is widely known and documented. Resistance development has been documented in MBC fungicides (FRAC code 1) to benomyl (no longer on the market) and thiophanate-methyl;  the DC fungicides (FRAC group 2) with iprodione; the SDHI fungicides (FRAC group 7) with boscalid, fluxapyroxad, and penthiopyrad; the AP fungicides (FRAC group 9) with pyrimethanil and cyprodinil; the strobilurin fungicides (FRAC group 11) with azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, and pyraclostrobin; and the Hyd fungicides (FRAC group 17) with fenhexamid. Cross resistance to fungicides within specific FRAC groups has also been widely documented. Most importantly, resistance to multiple FRAC groups has also been widely reported in Botrytis in the US. Recent studies across the southeast have shown that some Botrytis isolates can carry resistance to 2, 3, 4, or 5 different FRAC groups. A study from 2015 examining 2,000 Botrytis isolates collected across the southeast discovered that some isolates carried resistance to 6 or 7 different FRAC groups. As described the authors, this was likely the result of “selection by association” in which resistance was selected by the fungicide applied but also indirectly because the selected isolates were also inherently resistant to fungicides in other FRAC groups.

How to manage fruit rots and fungicide resistance development

The use of mulch to prevent/reduce soil splashing and keeping fruit from coming into direct contact with the soil surface can be beneficial in conventional production as well as organic production systems where conventional fungicides cannot be used. Long crop rotations and staying away from fields with known history of any of these pathogens is also extremely important, although this may be difficult on farms with U-pick operations where fields need to be close to the market and accessible. Adjusting plant populations to improve air movement and the drying of leaves and fruit within the canopy, and avoiding overhead irrigation are some of the cultural practices growers can do to help reduce losses to fruit rot.

Strawberry growers need to pay careful attention to the efficacy of all high-risk fungicides used during the season. Fields should be scouting regularly, particularly before and after a fungicide application. Remember, due to the specificity of high-risk fungicides, once resistance develops to any one particular fungicide chemistry the likelihood of cross-resistance development increases significantly to other fungicides within the same FRAC group. If loss of efficacy is noticed, growers should discontinue the use of that FRAC group during that growing season. Growers developing season-long fungicide programs for fruit rot control need to use as many different modes-of-action (i.e., different FRAC groups) as possible and limit the use of any single mode of action as much as possible to help mitigate resistance development. This is especially important when growers are applying fungicides with more than one mode of action. Careful attention needs to be made to both fungicide chemistries so that the same mode of action isn’t used during the next application. As a general rule, growers need to use as many different modes of action as possible and to space them out as far apart as possible during the production season.

For more information on the control of anthracnose fruit rot, gray mold, and leather rot in strawberry please see the 2020/2021 Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations Guide for the mid-Atlantic Region.

Identifying and controlling common leaf spot in strawberry

Strawberry leaf spot, caused by the soil-borne fungal pathogen, Mycosphaerella fragariae, can infect leaves, petioles, runners, fruit stalks (pedicels), and berry caps or calyxes. Small, dark purple to reddish-purple, round spots, 1/8 to 1/4 inch in diameter (3 to 6 millimeters), appear on the upper leaf surfaces. The center of the spots soon become tan or gray and eventually almost white, while the broad margins remain dark purple. Later in the season, dark specks (sclerotia and/or perithecia) may be seen in the older lesions. Tannish areas form on the undersides of infected leaves. The symptoms on the other plant parts, except the fruit, are almost identical to those that develop on the upper leaf surface. [Read more…]

Avoid Sunscald Injury in Transplants

The weather has been relatively dry these past few weeks and temperatures are already beginning to warm up this week, thus we need to be cautious about sunscald developing on the stems of transplants, especially those being set onto black plastic mulch. With a little planning ahead potential losses to sunscald injury can reduced significantly.

Sunscald

Sunscald injury on stems of newly transplanted pepper seedlings caused by stems laying against edges of black plastic mulch on hot, sunny days.

A transplant coming straight out of the greenhouse and directly into the field has not been exposed to much direct sunlight. Add that with black plastic mulch and you have a lot of heat aim directly at the tender tissue of the transplant. All transplants should have some time to harden-off outside the greenhouse before going into the field, a day or two, is better than none at all, the longer the better if time and space allow.

Sunscald typically appears as the slow bleaching out of the stem that will typically appear only on one side. Often this starts to appear right where the stem meets the black plastic mulch. In many cases if the stem is touching the mulch, the sunburn will start there and the transplant will begin to fall over as if the stem was broken.

When transplanting, make sure the holes in the plastic are wide enough to keep the stem from coming into contact with it. In some cases growers will fill in the transplant hole with soil to help keep the transplant upright before between-row herbicides are applied. ‘Leggy’ transplants that lay across plastic mulch and even those transplanted onto bare ground are prone to sunscald injury.

Identifying and Controlling Early-Season Damping-off Pathogens

It is extremely important to know which pathogen is causing damping-off problems and which fungicide to properly apply. The key to controlling damping-off is being proactive instead of reactive. Always refer to the fungicide label for crop use, pathogens controlled, and application rates.

Damping-off is caused by a number of important vegetable pathogens and is very common during the spring. Damping-off can kill seedlings before they break the soil line (pre-emergent damping-off) or kill seedlings soon after they emerge (post-emergent damping-off). Common pathogens that cause damping-off include Pythium, Phytophthora, Rhizoctonia and Fusarium spp.

Control of damping-off depends on a number of factors. First, is recognizing the conditions which may be leading to the problem (i.e., weather/greenhouse growing conditions) and second, identifying the pathogen causing the problem.

Conditions Favoring Damping-off

Although all four pathogens are associated with damping-off, the conditions which favor their development are very different. In general, Phytophthora and Pythium are more likely to cause damping-off in cool, wet or overwatered soils that aren’t allowed to dry out due to cloudy weather or cooler temperatures. Conversely, Rhizoctonia and Fusarium are more likely to cause damping-off under warmer, drier conditions especially if plug trays are kept on the dry side to help reduce transplant growth. [Read more…]

Manage your transplant watering schedule

The weather this spring has been relatively normal to date. However, we have had some dry weather these past few weeks. Unfortunately, weather patterns can cause problems in transplant production, especially when it comes time for watering. Hot days may require more than one watering, and cloudy days may require no water. In either case, growers need to anticipate their transplant water needs without over or under estimating watering. Of course, other factors include the growing media and the plant itself. Lets focus on media, for example, growers using a lighter soilless media, these will dry out much quicker than a heavier media and will require more daily watering (e.g., once in AM, afternoon, and evening). Growers using a heavier media may only have to water once a day, or early in the AM and maybe once more in the PM. Either type of media works fine as long as the weather doesn’t change and it fits the growers needs. Proper transplant watering is all about adjustment. If you have stuck to the same daily watering schedule this spring its very likely you have grossly over or under watered your transplants at some point. And, in all likelihood, grossly over or under watered trying to correct the situation. Uniformity is also key when it comes to proper transplant watering. If you find yourself spot watering out of schedule because some flats dry out quicker than others then most likely your uniformity is off. This is easily done when watering is done by hand with a wand. Poor uniformity can also be the result of transplant flats being set on uneven benches or uneven floors. Much like a field, low spots tend to collect the most water. All of this can lead to uneven transplant growth as well as disease and pest pressure, such as fungus gnat problems. If you are experiencing uneven transplant growth, then most likely your watering is uneven. For transplant growth to remain even, flats need to be watered each time to maximum water holding capacity, where each cell in the flat holds the maximum amount of water. An easy way to see this is to watch for water dripping out the bottom of the flat. As important, flats should also uniformly dry out. Below is an example of tomato transplants that have been pulled from the same flat. You can see the differences in plant height as well as root system formation as a result of uneven watering in a “heavy” soilless media. Cells that have remained on the wet side show poor growth and poor root system development because of a waterlogged cell; whereas cells that have been receiving the appropriate amount of water have much better growth and a nice root ball. The weight test. When was the last time you picked up a transplant tray? Picking up a transplant flat every once in a while will give you an idea of how well your watering schedule and uniformity is! Everyone has picked up a tray that has felt like it has the weight of a rock or the tray breaks apart because of the weight, or when you pick it up and it feels as light as a feather. Doing this is a good way to determine if your soilless media is “heavy” – holds more water than you think or if you have been overwatering on days you shouldn’t be or if you have not watered enough. Consistency is key when watering. Going from an extremely wet to an extremely dry transplant tray is not what you want for the transplant production season. You want consistent soil moisture as much as possible, thus proper transplant watering is all about the proper adjustments and knowing your media.

Root growth in tomato transplants

Differences in soil moisture across a single flat of tomato transplants.

Root growth in tomato transplants

Roots of tomato transplants in a flat that has irregular soil moisture.

Grower’s Guide: Understanding the DMI fungicides (FRAC code 3) in 2022

The DMI (DeMethylation Inhibitors) or Sterol Biosynthesis Inhibiting (SBI’s) fungicides belong to FRAC code 3 which include the triazoles and imidazoles. Some of these fungicides are commonly known as Tilt (propiconazole), Rally (myclobutanil), Folicur (tebuconazole), and Procure (triflumizole) and are widely-used in agriculture.

DMI’s work by inhibiting the biosynthesis of ergosterol which is a major component of the plasma membrane of certain fungi and needed for fungal growth. Resistance by fungi to the DMI fungicides has been characterized and is generally known to be controlled by the accumulation of several independent mutations, or what is known as ‘continuous selection’ or ‘shifting’, in the fungus.

In any given field population, the sensitivity to the DMI fungicide by the fungus may range from extremely high (highly sensitive, and will be controlled by fungicide) to moderate (partially sensitive to the fungicide) or low (mostly resistant to fungicide).

This type of resistance is also known as quantitative resistance. With quantitative resistance, as stated above, there are different levels of resistance to the fungicide due to independent mutations, which, is unlike the target mutations that occur in qualitative resistance associated with the QoI (FRAC code 11) fungicides. Because different levels of resistance to the DMI fungicide may exist in the field, control of fungal population may widely vary based on the rate of the DMI fungicide being applied. It is suggested that using a higher rate of a DMI fungicide, may improve control when lower rates have failed.

For example, let’s say that a cucurbit powdery mildew population on pumpkin consists of 25% highly sensitive, 50% moderately sensitive, and a 25% low sensitive (resistant) population to a DMI fungicide. If fungicide is applied at the low rate, only 25% of the population (highly sensitive) may be controlled. Where, if the high rate was used, 75% (the 25% highly sensitive + 50% moderately sensitive) of population would have been controlled. The main point is that if low rates of DMI fungicides have been used and control seems to be weakening, increasing to a higher rate may improve control.

Unfortunately, it is difficult to determine what proportion of the powdery mildew population is sensitive or not sensitive by just looking at the field until you have begun a proper spray program. The best advice, if you are using low rates and think those rates are not working, is to increase to the high rate the next time the fungicide is sprayed, and if the high rate still doesn’t work it may be safe to assume the fungal population has grown mostly resistant. Importantly, if the high rate fails, whether you bumped up to a high rate or started with one, and control does not seem adequate, DO NOT continue to use the DMI fungicide.

Recognizing if and when fungicide chemistries are failing and when fungicide resistance is developing is critically important to producing successful crops and why scouting on a regular basis, at least before and after each fungicide application, is important. Regular scouting can help reduce unwarranted and ineffective fungicide applications and help reduce wasted costs.

Remember to always tank mix DMI fungicides with protectant (M) fungicides (i.e., chlorothalonil, manzate) to help reduce the chances for fungicide resistance developing. Always apply DMI fungicides according to label rates and resistant management recommendations and always be aware of the fungicide rate you are applying.