Archives for July 2020

Vegetable IPM Update 7/29/20

Sweet Corn

European corn borer (ECB) adults continue to be very low, although a few traps in Cape May and Burlington counties have shown initial signs of a second flight.  Numbers are low and isolated such that no map will appear in this edition.

The highest nightly trap catches of ECB for the week ending 7/29/20 are as follows:

Eldora   2 Downer   1
Cinnaminson   1 Medford   1

 

Fall armyworm (FAW) larval infestations are generally low, but IPM technicians report more frequent occurrences in the central counties.   This is the time of the summer when FAW can show up, resulting in significant injury to whorl and even seedling stage corn.  Injury from newly hatched larvae shows up as “window panes” or areas where leaf tissue has been eaten down the the lower epidermis (see photo at far left).  This injury leads down into the whorl.  As larvae gain size, they begin to consume leaf tissue in its’ entirety, creating ragged holes and lots of droppings (see photo at near left).  FAW can be tough to manage because it is resistant to synthetic pyrethroid insecticides (IRAC 3A) and because larvae are often covered by their own droppings, making contact with the insecticide more difficult.  Treat when 12% or more plants exhibit FAW injury alone, or in combination with ECB injury.

 

 

Corn earworm (CEW) moth captures have remained largely unchanged in blacklight traps this past week.  This moderate mid-Summer population poses a significant risk to silking corn.  Blacklight catches were highest overall along the Atlantic coast (see map at left), with blue areas on this map representing a 4-5 day spray schedule.

 

 

The highest nightly trap catches of CEW in black light traps for the week ending 7/29/20 are as follows:

Denville  2 Crosswicks   1 Hackettstown   1
Jones Island   2 East Vineland   1 Medford   1
Matawan   2 Elm   1 New Egypt   1
Allamuchy   1 Green Creek   1 Tabernacle   1

[Read more…]

Fruit IPM for 7/29/20

Peach:

Stink Bugs Apples and Peaches: Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (BMSB) has been steadily increasing in isolated locations. The highest levels seen are on 2 farms in Gloucester County at 4 per trap and at 2 farms in Morris County at 16 and 18 per trap. The Morris County traps are adjacent to apples, and represent high levels of BMSB. Most, but not all of the pyrethroid  and pyrethroid premixes have good activity for BMSB. See the 2020 NJ Tree Fruit Production Guide for a list of effective materials. Where growers are using OFM mating disruption in peaches, then weekly border sprays for BMSB will help. In apples a 7 day program may be needed as trap captures increase. [Read more…]

USDA Farmers To Families Food Box Program – New Round Solicitation

Listening in USDA’s webinar reveals major changes in this latest solicitation for the third round of the Farmers to Families Food Box Program. This time they only want multi-commodity ‘combination boxes’, i.e. produce plus meat/dairy plus optional eggs! — check out the specs on page 4 of the solicitation here – https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/FFFB_solicitationRound3.pdf). They are much more specific on items (weights/types) to be included in box.
There is also new emphasis on not passing on costs to food banks/NGOs – the contracted vendor now responsible for covering the cost of delivery from foodbank to individual (the last mile of distribution!?) so that needs to be included in the proposed box price.
There is no deadline for submission and proposals can be submitted immediately. This time the govt will review the proposal and then return for revision if there are questions or missing items (not done in first 2 rounds). They will help identify what is missing or needing revision! This solicitation will close when the Government has enough awardees in each region so it means the faster a complete proposal is submitted, the more likely of receiving a contract. Awards will begin on approval and last through Aug. 15, 2022.
As soon as it’s available a recording of the webinar will be made available.
Key Takeaways:
  • Read the solicitation completely (this is completely different from earlier program so need to reapply)
  • Important to get the most up-to-date information from USDA’s acquisition staff.
  • Two key submissions
    • Adobe pdf
    • Excel spreadsheet (don’t modify the template!)
  • Submit questions to FFFBQuestions@usda.gov

Meet Cosmo, a bull calf designed to produce 75% male offspring

NEWS RELEASE 

(reposted from EurekAlert and AAAS)

Scientists use CRISPR technology to insert sex-determining gene

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA – DAVIS

Cow
IMAGE: COSMO, A 110-POUND BULL CALF WAS BORN IN APRIL OF 2020 AT UC DAVIS. SCIENTISTS SUCCESSFULLY GENOME-EDITED HIM AS AN EMBRYO TO PRODUCE MORE MALE OFFSPRING. view more 

CREDIT: ALISON VAN EENENNAAM/UC DAVIS

Scientists at the University of California, Davis, have successfully produced a bull calf, named Cosmo, who was genome-edited as an embryo so that he’ll produce more male offspring. The research was presented in a poster today (July 23) at the American Society of Animal Science meeting.

Using the genome-editing technology CRISPR, researchers can make targeted cuts to the genome or insert useful genes, which is called a gene knock-in. In this case, scientists successfully inserted or knocked-in the cattle SRY gene, the gene that is responsible for initiating male development, into a bovine embryo. It’s the first demonstration of a targeted gene knock-in for large sequences of DNA via embryo-mediated genome editing in cattle.

“We anticipate Cosmo’s offspring that inherit this SRY gene will grow and look like males, regardless of whether they inherit a Y chromosome,” said Alison Van Eenennaam, animal geneticist with the UC Davis Department of Animal Science.

MORE MALES, MORE BEEF

Van Eenennaam says part of the motivation to produce more male cattle is that male cattle are about 15 percent more efficient at converting feed into weight gain. They are more fuel-efficient than females. Additionally, they tend to be processed at a heavier weight.

It could also be a win for the environment, with fewer cattle needed to produce the same amount of beef. “Ranchers could produce some females as replacements and direct a higher proportion of male cattle for market,” said Joey Owen, a postdoctoral researcher in animal science who is leading the project with Van Eenennaam.

AN ARDUOUS JOURNEY

The SRY gene was inserted into bovine chromosome 17, which is a genomic safe harbor site. That ensures the genetic elements function predictably and don’t disrupt the expression or regulation of adjacent genes. Chromosome 17 was chosen after unsuccessful attempts to knock-in the gene on the X chromosome, which would have resulted in a bull that produced only male offspring. Cosmo is expected to produce 75 percent male offspring — the normal 50 percent XY animals, and another 25percent XX animals that inherit the SRY gene.

“It took two and a half years to develop the method to insert a gene into the developing embryo and another two years to successfully establish a pregnancy,” said Owen. But in April of 2020, a healthy 110-pound male calf was born.

“This has been a real labor of love,” said Van Eenennaam.

She said this is just the beginning of the research. Cosmo will reach sexual maturity in a year, and he will be bred to study if inheriting the SRY gene on chromosome 17 is sufficient to trigger the male developmental pathway in XX embryos, and result in offspring that will grow and look like males. As the Food and Drug Administration regulates gene-editing of animals as if they were drugs, Cosmo and his offspring will not enter the food supply.

###

Other researchers on the team include James Murray, Pablo Ross, Sadie Hennig and Jason Lin with the UC Davis Department of Animal Science, and Bret McNabb and Tamer Mansour of the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine.

This project was supported by Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant Program from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the California Agricultural Experiment Station at UC Davis and the USDA NIFA National Needs Graduate and Postgraduate Fellowship.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.

Unsolicited Seeds From Foreign Sources

Several states are now reporting and you may have read or heard news reports of packets of seeds arriving in the mail from foreign shipping addresses that were not ordered. If you receive such a packet, DO NOT open or discard them. Rather, follow these directions from the NJ Dept of Agriculture:

UPDATED NJDA ALERT (https://www.nj.gov/agriculture/news/hottopics/topics200727.html)

We have been receiving reports of people receiving seeds in the mail from China that they did not order. Sometimes the seeds are sent in packages stating that the contents are jewelry. Unsolicited seeds could be invasive, introduce diseases to local plants, or be harmful to livestock.

Here’s what to do if you receive unsolicited seeds from another country:

This is known as agricultural smuggling. Report it to the USDA!

  1. DO NOT plant them and if they are in sealed packaging don’t open the sealed package.
  2. Take a photo of the package and seeds and send the photos to the New Jersey Department of Agriculture Joseph.zoltowski@ag.nj.gov and USDA SITC at  SITC.Mail@aphis.usda.gov
  3. Maintain the seeds and packaging and send to the USDA Office located at 1500 Lower Rd, Linden NJ 07036 for evidence. 

If individuals are aware of the potential smuggling of prohibited exotic fruits, vegetables, or meat products into or through the USA, they can help APHIS by contacting the confidential Anti-smuggling Hotline number at 800-877-3835 or by sending an Email to SITC.Mail@aphis.usda.gov. USDA will make every attempt to protect the confidentiality of any information sources during an investigation within the extent of the law.

One-line email signature graphic: We R Here When You Need Us.

****************************************************************

cid:image002.png@01D3F9A9.A68FD670

Differentiating the Common Wood Borers of Ash Trees

Today, it is understandable for arborists and landscapers to assume that Emerald Ash Borers (Agrilus planipennis) are the cause when they observe branch die-back of ash trees (Fraxinus genus). During the 21st century, this invasive Asian tree beetle borer has killed many 100’s of millions of ash tree species as it has spread across much of the eastern half of the United States. However, it is important to remember some of the other wood borer species that cause ash decline, if not death. This blog will discuss the symptoms to distinguish between the Emerald ash beetle borer, the Ash/Lilac Clearwing moth borer (Podosesia syringae), the Banded Ash Clearwing moth borer (Podosesia aureocincta) and Ash Bark Beetle borers (Hylesinus species). Only the ash bark beetle species will have more than a single generation per season.

Symptoms on ash from banded ash clearwing moth borer infestation. (Photo Credit: Steven K. Rettke of RCE)

[Read more…]